Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

A few objects caught last night


barkingsteve

Recommended Posts

evo 925 with F6.3 reducer and 385c camera. I did not use the ir or cls filter last night, still experimenting :)  from a red/white zone ( i think, 12 miles from central London facing an A road less than 1/2 mile away ) Some light editing in photoshop.

 

M66 frames @ 134 seconds

m2_Stack_66frames_134s.thumb.jpg.3edb588cd7c1294f24e55cc346055534.jpg

 

M13 40 frames @ 179 seconds

m13_Stack_40frames_179s.thumb.jpg.4003309925f708c79041a1d08f605aec.jpg

 

M15 42 frames @ 85 seconds

m15_Stack_42frames_85s.thumb.jpg.28a5d205051710912bc7bad149c9fbc5.jpg

 

M27 64 frames @ 297 seconds

1774766641_m27Stack_64frames_297s.thumb.jpg.8a2576c454fa2cf60daedd5f2a8b6e9d.jpg

 

M33 30 frames @ 294 seconds

m33_Stack_30frames_294s.thumb.jpg.c2a522c3270f172fb5488ab072255f32.jpg

 

M57 19 frames @ 273 seconds

m57_Stack_19frames_273s.thumb.jpg.75d92616fbc78c32bacc2a8e5593adc1.jpg

 

M92 24 frames @ 152 seconds

m92_Stack_34frames_152s.thumb.jpg.15aee6102b8a8012a9691e36ec10a898.jpg

 

NGC 1023 40 frames @ 516 seconds

ngc1023_Stack_40frames_516s.thumb.jpg.1cffdc89320a5338fe113eccf964bc5f.jpg

 

NGC 1245 21 frames @ 264 seconds

ngc1245_stack_21frames_264s.thumb.jpg.5286d1ceb2457ba926ee7180f372e6d3.jpg

 

Still amazes me i can see so much from my crappy location :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi barkingsteve,

Nice pictures, I understand that your scope  has an altaz mount. Did you use a wedge? I imagine you would get star trails with exposures like 516 seconds otherwise.

Best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Very nice results in colour. Have you tried using a more aggressive reducer like 0.5 or 0.33? I think this would definitely help on the fainter stuff like M33. The 0.33 reducers can be a challenge; I can’t get any faster than 0.45 without coma like effects but this still halves the exposure times needed compared to 0.63. If you could get down to 0.33 (which plenty of people seem to do) then the exposures times are a quarter compared to 0.63. Your sensor size is similar to my small lodestar camera, so should work for more aggressive focal reduction I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.