Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep14_banner.thumb.jpg.27eb9b06c9c8a1fe5ac3bae21c92743b.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
Sunnaroe

Seasoned appetite for Astronomy-Newjack sense of direction.

Recommended Posts

 To save time getting right to the point-Ive owned a celestron skyprodigy 90 and that scope alone made me feel more powerful than ever.Im planning on spending close to 2,000 on a new setup with a far larger aperture and although I love the cassegrain goto scopes from celestron and Meade,I’ve been wondering if my budget should go toward a custom dobsonian.

 My dream begins with landing a setup within that budget and choosing the right attachments to be able to study the moon up close and personal.If you can imagine it I’d like to be able to at least recognize a footprint if there is one.Im assuming this is possible while so many scopes can see so much further away like other planets and such.

 I’m more than grateful for any input that you’ve learned the hard way or any financial corners I can cut while still being true to the game.

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The single most important thing is optical quality, so if you're going to go for a Dob, go for the best optics your budget can buy. Aperture is secondary -  its worth losing a few inches if it means getting a higher quality mirror. Better optics mean better definition and a more detailed view. Just as an example, I'd much prefer a truly high end 8" Dob over an average 12". Don't be tempted by fancy focusers or cosmetics as things like that don't make it a good telescope. Go for optical quality first and gadgetry and go faster stripes can be added later if need be.

If its the Moon that you're interested in then perhaps a high quality refractor, such as a ED120 would be more suitable, as the ED120 despite being smaller in aperture, will give a significantly sharper more well defined view than most reflectors. The ED120 is a great lunar and planetary scope, and its able to pack quite a punch on DSO's too.

Edited by mikeDnight
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you want to observe? Just the moon? 

No telescope will allow you to see footprints on the moon. It is much bigger and further away than you are thinking and the Earth's atmosphere will get in the way long before you reach the sort of magnifications you would need to are something so small. Also, your current 90mm scope is perfectly capable of seeing other planets, they just appear much smaller than the moon. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why a Dobsonian? The original intent of the Dobsonian design was to make a setup that was cheap and easy to make as a home-brew for large Newtonians, and would offer a large aperture scope that could be transported to dark-skies sites.  The design has now been taken up by commercial makers who offer it as a "low-cost" design.  It's what some people clearly want, but on the other hand they don't track, they have image rotation making them unsuitable for long exposure photography (and they don't track) the don't do Goto except at substantial extra cost, and they don't have manual slow motions.  Nowhere here is anything that makes them particularly suitable for looking at the Moon under high magnification.

There has been much discussion here about the best telescope for planetary (including lunar) observation.  Some people argue for relatively small apertures.  In any case, the turbulent atmosphere limits the performance of larger aperture telescopes, unless they are sited on a mountain top.  There is a thread here about "what you can expect to see" which you should find and read.  As for the mount, you at least want something that tracks under power.

If you want a recommendation, the Celestron C8 SE SCT may not be the best possible planetary scope ever, but it 's a highly effective one, and very usable.

Footprints? I think even seeing a lunar object the size of a football stadium might be too much to expect.  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you guys for the info.I admit I’m wet behind the ears in this but the passion is lifelong and just getting stronger as I age and can’t help but to wonder more.Most of all I appreciate the info on purchases.With a pretty big family I’m not willing to spend too much and all the advertising is beyond confusing when shopping for a scope I could grow with.It blows that I won’t see the moon in the magnification I dream of but there truly is far more I’m hoping to see and learn.I’ll add onto this thread when I see more comments or at least when I make my purchase.Better yet -I’ll choose a telescope then report here BEFORE I do.Oh and to answer about the Dob-I did some research and watched a video of John Dobson building one way back and the hand grinded mirror gave me such a great respect for the process I considered it boss.Thought maybe starting with a Dob would make me learn the way the Pros do.

Edited by Sunnaroe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Arshad Wali Muhammad
      Hi. I want to buy Celestron Evolution 9.25 with startsense. I have heard star sense isn’t avbl in 9.25 but 8.0. Is it true ? Is starsense very useful ? What’s actually is starsense is ? Because I’m not interested in 8 inch. Secondly is it better then 11 inch  CGX EQUATORIAL 1100 SCHMIDT-CASSEGRAIN TELESCOPE? If not what’s the difference in terms of object clearity ? Secondly is Celestron motorized ? I mean to say the object moves very fast, so can it track the object live ? Please advise. 


    • By Monofoot
      Hi guys, firstly - sorry if this is posted in the wrong place. 
      I've just ordered a Canon 600D to start doing some astrophotography and it arrives tomorrow - I'm stoked. I've been wanting to get into astrophotography for a while now and I'm so happy to finally be pulling the trigger.
      The last item on my shopping list is a solid beginner telescope which would couple well with my Canon 600D. The research I've done is all pointing towards a newtonian reflector.
      My primary goal here is to take some pictures of stars and planets with the Canon 600D attached to the telescope. I've been looking at the Sky-Watcher 114/900 as it's relatively cheap, which I think is great for someone just starting off - but was wondering what your opinions were seeing as you've all been through this before. Do you have any other recommendations? I'd like to keep my budget up to £300, and that's stretching it really.
      Thanks for taking the time to help!
    • By lyfestyle
      Hello all, my name is Paige. I am a college student and new to the stargazing community. I know all about the constellations and astronomy, but i’ve never bought anything to see the stars up close. I’ve read through the forum and come to the conclusions I want to start with some well built binoculars and eventually get into telescopes. The 7 x 50 seem to be the common starting point but I would love to get something with a bit more clarity, and preferably still handheld.  I’ve also read up on some binoculars already and the big brands that jump out are Celestron and Orion, so I would love some opinions on those because they don’t seem to be reliable in the long run. I only have one shot on a good pair and I dont plan on buying any other equipment until i’ve mastered the binoculars! Price range up to around $300 so any tips would be amazing!
      Thank you, happy sky watching 🌌
    • By onefistinthestars
      To celebrate the 25th anniversary of Sir Patrick's DSO catalogue, I've added the available Caldwells to my basic Marathon search sequence. 
      Those interested may be pleasantly surprised by how many of the additional treasures are only a short hop from a given (or en route to the next) Messier.
      The sequence for 40°N can be found at the SEDS Messier Marathon homepage or at my blog.
      Peace, Stephen
    • By Grigs
      Just thought I would say hi to everyone. 
      I am a Noob, but have been googling astronomy for past year, so am familiar with some of the lighter terminology.  
      Most of my googles have directed me to this site, so I have already read forum posts here numerous times.
      Have already acquired quite a bit of kit, but just not found the time to try it out yet. 
      This should hopefully change soon as I am expecting to have a lot more spare time in a couple of months. 
      Being in the Midlands in the UK, I am not currently missing much, due to the current cloudy weather here. 
      I am looking forward to picking your brains and in time posting some of my experiences here. 
      Kindest regards, 
      Geo.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.