Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss.thumb.jpg.5b348d6a5e7f27bdcb79e9356b7fc03b.jpg

DaveS

Words fail me

Recommended Posts

@steppenwolf posted this earlier... 

Local authorities saying they do not have money for local & social services. Yet they can afford to fund someones bright idea!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the people who thought this up couldn't find their backsides with both hands.

It's just along the coast from where I'm moving to. Hopefully on the other side of Weymouth and will be screened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've got £200k to revamp a beachfront, surely you can do a bit better than some flashing lights?

James

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unreal.

A few years ago, Southampton City Council wanted to have green lasers coming off the top of their Guidhall, to complete with Portsmouth's Spinnaker tower.

It was rejected, but I can't find any links on it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason words fail you, Dave, is our Code of Conduct.

And, therefore, words fail me too. The emojis give only the slightest hint - ??? ?

Edited by Floater
Found another emoji
  • Like 3
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing something that would genuinely improve peoples' lives would seem to be a far better use of the cash, but if it must be spent on some sort of vanity project I'd personally prefer that they spent it on a few pieces of sculpture or something similar to go along the waterfront.  At least then there'd be something for future generations rather than getting chucked away when it becomes too awkward or expensive to run and maintain, or when people get bored of them.

James

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what lights these would be replacing? Maybe theres a long term cost saving if they are replacing old, high maintenance fixtures. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moving from the apparently bizarre attitude of Weymouth to light pollution double standards seem to be in full flow in France.  In our village and neighbouring villages no one goes out on foot at night but there are street lights every thirty metres down the main street.  If our farmer friends, who live about 60 metres away, come for a tipple in the evening they come by car.  The mayor in each village has the power to approve new lighting and, in the next village to us,  panders to the envy of residents who don't have a street light outside their house by approving the erection of a new one.  However, take off from Toulouse at night and there you can see huge residential areas where modern lighting has been installed, low level shining downwards.  Areas of old lighting still shine blindingly upwards but if the city fathers continue the trend Toulouse could one day be an unshining example to the rest of the world - Weymouth included.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone actually GO to the "British Seaside" anymore? Every time I go
for a walk along the "prom"... I am virtually alone? The NEW (dredged up!)
beach looks *great*. Idem the new Watersports Center - But it's a long way
to walk from the town. The "last bus home" now runs at 5:15 p.m. too... ?

Edited by Macavity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lights at Weymouth are weird enough already, imo. Once had fish and chips after dark there with the family. Apart for the required group of drunks (at 5pm) there wasn't really anyone else around. A whole load of silly green lasers pointing about at the sea for nobody to look at. I am probably one of those hard-hearted ignoramuses who hate modern "art" but frankly it looks ridiculous and does absolutely nothing to add to or (subtract from) the beauty of the sea at night.

All I can say is, at least they haven't started up floodlighting the sea floor for night-time divers of something. ?

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The beaches around this corner of the country are full to bursting I gather.  I don't go to the beach in the summer - I don't like crowds!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funded by the governments "Coastal Communities Fund" LOL, is that the same government that keeps pleading poverty :grin:

How about replacing them with a row of Victorian gas lights ?

Dave

Edited by Davey-T
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Went fown to Weymouth this afternoon, and yes, it was heaving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, there seem to be (with exceptions) three main types of English seaside towns (or areas within them)

1 - Trendy - with a marina, bistros, delis and lots of people wearing deck shoes, shorts with a crease in them and rugby shirts with the collars turned up,

2 - Retirement homes - row after row of bungalows each with a very clean Honda Jazz on the drive,

3 - Rundown - basically a waiting area for the Jeremy Kyle show with fruit machines.

Edited by michaelmorris
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, michaelmorris said:

In my experience, there seem to be (with exceptions) three main types of English seaside towns (or areas within them)

1 - Trendy - with a marina, bistros, delis and lots of people wearing deck shoes, shorts with a crease in them and rugby shirts with the collars turned up,

2 - Retirement homes - row after row of bungalows each with a very clean Honda Jazz on the drive,

3 - Rundown - basically a waiting area for the Jeremy Kyle show with fruit machines.

Sadly most of them are #3. ? My observation is that quite a lot of the #3s also seem to think that the beach is greatly improved by listening to hip-hop etc at ear-breaking volume. (Perhaps I should add that I don't think it is. ;))

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

... greatly improved ... at ear-breaking volume. (Perhaps I should add that I don't think it is. ;))

John

Nope! Didn’t have to add that, John. ?

Edited by Floater
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly I'm not yet a residant, else I'd give them a piece of my mind over this nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Captain Magenta
      Last year I was given a Unihedron SQM-L, the narrow field of view version of their gadget for measuring night-sky brightness. Since then, I’ve nipped outside to take zenith readings whenever I’ve been able, often a few times per night. As a result I now have 85 data-points, all from my back garden in Sunbury on Thames which rates a 19.04 on www.lightpollutionmap.info . As it turns out, this agrees well with the data I’ve collected.
      The darkest I’ve measured at this location has been 19.13, with 4 records better than 19.05 and 10 better than 19.00.
      Plotted against Moon altitude, it looks like:

      One thing I noticed very early on was that the reading generally gets darker and darker as the night goes on. The chart below suggests the data agrees, but how strongly I’m not adept enough yet with my statistics to work out. If anyone fancies doing this for me, I’d be grateful, I’ve attached the data .csv file I think to the end of this post.

      The data itself: each record contains date, time[GMT], SQM value, Moon phase, Moon altitude . For the purposes of my analysis, I’ve converted the time value into hoursafter6pm, which allows the intercept of the regression solution to be loosely considered as the “6pm starting point” for the darkness estimation, which is OK for this dataset as my data is all from this latest Autumn/Winter.
      I’ve done an “ordinary least-squares” regression with multiple input variables. At first glance it seems to me that the SQ vs altitude chart above should not behave well with that: there’s a clear kink, intuitively obvious I guess, at the point the Moon altitude goes negative.
      To cope with that, I divided my data into two and did three separate regressions: “Moon up” data, “Moon down”, and “All data” but treating phase and altitude as zero if the Moon is below -5 degrees (I chose -5 degrees arbitrarily).
      With Moon up, I decided the SQM value will depend on Time of Night, Moon Altitude and Phase. With Moon down, it only needs to depend on time of night.
      Thus my regression model is:
      SkyQual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude + residual
      or rearranged
      residual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude – SkyQual
      The analysis involves minimizing the sum of (the squares of the) residuals, by hunting around for the appropriate values of a, b, c & d which yields this minimum. I used MS Excel’s built-in Solver to do the “hunting around”.
      The following table summarizes the results:

      In words, using “Moon Up” as my subject, my Sky Quality, in magnitudes per arc-second, can be estimated as
      19.28 mags/arc-sec
      plus 0.0314 /hour
      minus 0.864 /full-phase (or 0.216 /quarter)
      minus 0.0186 /degree above horizon (or 0.186 /10 degrees).
      This is a pretty simple analysis. I’m sure there’s theory and formulae available relating Moon-altitude and -phase to extra sky brightness, but I haven’t used any of that here. And the “error model” I’ve used implicitly assumes that the relationships between SQM-reading and the variables are linear.
      If anyone is curious and wishes to do their own analysis, my raw-ish data is available as a .csv file attachment at the end of this post.
      Cheers,
      Magnus
       
      A note about the data collection: each reading is an average of a few readings at a given time, with outliers rejected. For instance, often the first press yields an outlier, and over the following few seconds subsequent ones tend to settle down. So the series of readings 19.05 (me getting excited), 18.85, 18.86, 18.86 , which is a quite typical pattern, would cause me to record 18.86. My highest recorded reading, 19.13, was indeed where it settled down.
      Other “one-on-one” charts:
         
      SQMLdata201903.csv
    • By Gfamily
      I gave a demonstration/workshop at my local Astro Group* about a simple way of removing light pollution from an Astro Photo. 
      The description I gave was deliberately for beginners, using a wide angle tripod shot photo and using one of the easiest packages to get to grips with (Paint.net). 
      The attached pdf covers the basic technique. 
      I'd appreciate any feedback on it. 
       
       
       
      * The Mid Cheshire Astronomical Group - all welcome, we meet on the last Friday of the Month.
      LP MCAG.pdf
    • By laser_jock99
      Congratulations to Welsh photographer Alyn Wallace for getting National Geographic Photo Of The Day for these pictures of the Elan Valley night sky.
      https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/photography/amazing-images-wales-starlight?fbclid=IwAR0hz92NXMnCh-ZaMw_MyFNkjKhRHYXIZLcygZGkTV_lHpNjjtvHWtNDXZg
       
    • By ShrewView
      In the battle against light pollution it seems moths may be our new best friend. This article is about the effects of light pollution on moths and the reduction in pollination that results.
      https://a.msn.com/r/2/BBSwdmN?m=en-gb&referrerID=InAppShare
       
    • By laser_jock99
      The Campaign To Protect Rural England are running another star survey to monitor the spread of Light Pollution- details here:
      https://www.cpre.org.uk/what-we-do/countryside/dark-skies/star-count-2019?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=campaigns-update-2019-jan&utm_content=Campaigns+Update+2019+Jan
      TAKE PART: 2 February - 23 February
      Help us reclaim our dark skies
      Dark, starry skies are one of the most magical sights the countryside can offer. But light pollution means many of us can’t see the stars. We want to reconnect people with the wonder of our glorious night skies.
      You can take part in #StarCount2019 and help us map light pollution, to ensure more of us can enjoy the most magical sight the countryside has to offer.
      Our Star Count will take place this February, when we’ll be asking you to look up at the night sky and tell us how many you can see in Orion. You can do this from anywhere in England.
      The results will help us to create a new map to show how light pollution affects everybody’s views of the night sky.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.