Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg


Guest

Recommended Posts

Getting back into astronomy after many years.  Really tasted the thrill as a youngster: eg

Jupiter Saturn conj of 1981 viewed through a 4" refractor

Splitting the double on the 'tip of the sword' of Cygnus - which as I recall were red and green.

Naked eye all night sessions in Spain and New Zealand.

For the last couple of weeks I have been getting off to dark skies a few miles from where I live and using 8x32's and I have just bought some used Celestron (Echelon) 16x70's which came a couple of days ago - since which time, in accordance with the Laws of Physics, the skies have been cloudy!

I am probably going to get an Orion parallelogram tripod, but there are long waiting times - in the meantime would love to know of any advice people may have on monopods / heads and a mount that will fix to the Echelons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Guest
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome. I had to do another rescan of the 4th line after quickly readin it slightly differently! ;)

BTW: used to have an Orion binocular Mount, but hardly ever used it, so was mostly gathering dust in a corner of the room. My binos are now mostly fixed onto my monopod with a trigger grip for when I do use them to scan around the skies. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Knighty2112 said:

Hi and welcome. I had to do another rescan of the 4th line after quickly readin it slightly differently! ;)

BTW: used to have an Orion binocular Mount, but hardly ever used it, so was mostly gathering dust in a corner of the room. My binos are now mostly fixed onto my monopod with a trigger grip for when I do use them to scan around the skies. 

Totally missed that one  ;))

Any recommendations on big monopod for lanky observer

Edited by Guest
bit I forgot
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JamesF said:

Welcome from deepest, darkest west Somerset.

James

Thanks, you look very well placed for Dark Skied Exmoor & The Quantocks - do you get out there much for observing?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, robbymain said:

Welcome from another SW based returnee! Whereabouts are you based?

Bridport or thereabouts... lots of fairly dark sky within easy reach but so far the places I've been there's always some pollution even if several miles away.  I was on Exmoor last night for other reasons but cloudy anyway - still I reckon must be about as good as it gets in the SW??

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Earth Demon said:

Thanks, you look very well placed for Dark Skied Exmoor & The Quantocks - do you get out there much for observing?

I don't really need to, to be honest.  We're a few miles outside Wiveliscombe, with no near neighbours nor street lights and fairly clear horizons, so I am fortunate enough to be able to do most of my observing from home.

James

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Earth Demon said:

Bridport or thereabouts... lots of fairly dark sky within easy reach but so far the places I've been there's always some pollution even if several miles away.  I was on Exmoor last night for other reasons but cloudy anyway - still I reckon must be about as good as it gets in the SW??

I think all the moors are pretty good as a general rule.  Other than that I think it's quite dark in the area north of Holsworthy.  On the south coast it's a little more tricky to find good observing spots I think, though not impossible, and obviously having sea to the south can be very helpful when chasing those low Messier objects.

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

I met a farmer who lets me drive on his land for a small fee... nice for privacy and it's a pretty good spot with views right down to the sea horizon in the South.  (nr Bridport)  I have in mind to find some more...

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, JamesF said:

I don't really need to, to be honest.  We're a few miles outside Wiveliscombe, with no near neighbours nor street lights and fairly clear horizons, so I am fortunate enough to be able to do most of my observing from home.

James

Good for you.  I also live in dark place but right down in a valley and north facing so pretty terrible for astronomy really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all for the warmest of welcomes.

Up and out there last night until Taurus o'clock.

It was the most accomplished observing I have ever done - I had Sky Safari on the laptop to help me which sort of feels like cheating as my previous attempts at serious observation pre-date mobiles and laptops.  But never mind that - saw Uranus for the first time ever - easily available to my 8x32's if you know where to look - and of course I did thanks to the software.

Delighted to see Pisces really for the first time, and those bright stars in Aries but Pisces actually does have a shape to it.  

Used Steve Tonkin's broom tripod idea to get my first proper look through my new(ish) 16x70's as I am still waiting for monopod to arrive.  They showed Mars as a large disc - which was exhilarating but it had a glaring quality rather than just being flat or matte... can anything be done to avoid that?

Saturn was elliptical.

Andromeda was clear and present... I looked for M110 but couldn't see any hint of it - probably just too much for my bins. 

Delighted to have those 16x70's but they have also made me appreciate how useful my 8x32's are too.

Now I could just do with a nice pair of 7x50's.... I suppose this is how the kit collections begin.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By stevebty
      Good evening everyone
      I am looking at a SkyProdigy 6 telescope for a friend. the mount had a rattle/lose part. I partially unscrewed the casing and the plastic cylinder pictured below fell out. Anyone got any idea what it is or where is comes from. Looks plastic but can feel metal in the centre.
      Does anyone have a service manual or disassembly guide?
      Many thanks in advance
      Steve


    • By Quetzalcoatl72
      I'm after a cassegrain reflector but I don't know which one to buy,
      I have a celestron c5 and it worked wonders for all fields, I now want the same but twice as powerful as my final upgrade
      I am looking at a c9.5 for £1350 or a c11 for £2000, My question is an extra 2.75" focal worth it for £750 more?
      I will likely purchase one this week
    • By Welsh Dave
      Hello Ladies & Gentleman,
      I would in need of require your assistance for my current tube that I have got. 
      I currently have a Celestron Starlight XLT tube and I am looking for a new Finderscope (This one did not come with as I bought it of one of my Uni friends). I am not fussed into the red dot sites and I would like someone similar to the EXPLORE SCIENTIFIC ES 8x50. 
      Any questions by all means ask :) 

    • By Abhishek Pawse
      Hi guys. Please tell me if collimation is required for the celestron 9.25 edge HD  after using the hyper star system( after putting back the secondary mirror in its place ). Or it holds its collimation.?
      Thanks In advance for help :)
    • By andyrawlins
      Here is a review and then a couple of questions to the forum
      The experience I gained assessing my new Nikon Action EX 10x50s https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/369052-comparison-of-pentax-sp-50-wp-10x50-and-nikon-action-ex-10x50-cf/?tab=comments#comment-4009551 led me to dig out my old Vivitar Series 1 8x25.  I bought these in 1995 for £99, so not an insignificant amount then.  Series 1 was Vivitar's premium range at a time when (I believe) they were well regarded for their optics (now they seem to sell basically children's toy binoculars). Anyway, despite their price/apparent pedigree and excellent build (made in Japan) I never got on with them, finding them very difficult to focus and to keep in focus.  They rarely got used and indeed got superseded for general use by the Inpro 10x50 mentioned in the thread above.
          
      Using what I learned when assessing the Nikon's I decided that the focus problems were down to four things: 1. a small exit pupil, quoted as 3.12mm, so you need to have the eyepieces correctly positioned over each eye; 2. a short eye relief that I estimated to be about 11mm. I found the view (without glasses) to be best with the short (4.5mm) rubber eye cups folded down.  Wearing glasses, it was like looking down a drain pipe with a severely vignetted view; 3. difficulties getting the interpupillary distance right: for some reason the image is significantly brighter when the binoculars are set wider than the correct distance.  However, at this, what would appear to be the correct separation, they will not come completely to focus. When they are brought down to the correct distance (60mm for me)  the image suddenly gets darker but actually focusses well; 4. a very 'low geared' focus wheel and seemingly very short depth of field which necessitates a lot of focus twiddling every time you change view (not for objects at infinity, obviously).  Because of these things, its crucial to get the binoculars correctly positioned over the eyes and to keep them in that position.  Once they are correct the image is actually not bad.  To be specific, the image is almost exactly like it looks with the naked eye: the same colour balance, the same detail and resolution, the same clarity, the same brightness - just a bit bigger.  Its quite uncanny really. In contrast, the Nikons give an almost hyper-real clarity, detail and brightness and as serious wow factor. 
      Compared to the 10x50s they really didn't seem to magnify that much  (I found the objectives to actually be 23mm so 7.4x not 😎 but maybe this is something to do with AFoV. FoV is quoted as 'Wide Field 8.2°'.
      So basically they magnify the image but not the brightness which is fine for daylight use but fairly useless as night.  The big advantage, however, is that whereas the Nikon's are over a kilogram and will only just fit inside my zipped up coat when round my neck, these weigh a third as much (350g) and are a fraction of the size (105x120mm).  They easily fit in my coat pocket.  
      So I think I should give them more of a chance by keeping them in my coat pocket so they are there when I need them (the best binocular is the one you have with you!). 
      On to my question then: does anyone know anything more about these older Vivitars: whether they are actually any good and when and why the company seemed to give up with proper optics?  I can find nothing on the internet.  All I have is the Vivitar brochure from the time (attached) in which the certainly seem to regard themselves as makers of 'proper optics'. 
      I'd also welcome comments on the issues I found and whether my conclusions are correct.  



      IMG_20210113_0002.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.