Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Typical nebulae sizes and masses


Recommended Posts

I've been sitting here and working out some numbers for the stability of nebulae and how they collapse (the sort of thing that I do while on holiday) and I can model the collapse, ir radiation, and fragmentation of a nebula but does anyone have any figures for 'typical' nebulae sizes and masses?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. But perhaps you can help with something I have been wondering about forever.

So, Betelgeuse goes SN. How long until we see it from earth the same apparent size as M57? M27? NGC 6990-6992 ?

Thanks. I can't do maths, don't have the brain.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that they will vary considerably by type.

Probably easiest to figure out (order of magnitude) would be planetaries / SN remnants. Just take solar mass needed to go nova / supernova (upper bound would be black hole I guess) and respective neutron stars. Most of difference in mass will be in ejected shell (you can even account for radiation released in the process, but I suspect it will be well below 1 percent).

As for angular size - and expanded shell size - good plantarium software could give examples on those (as well as expansion speed in case of some nebulae of known age like M1 - Crab).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should clarify that. I'm talking about diffuse nebulae that are collapsing to form stars and not planetary or SN remnants. They by their nature gave to be stellar masses so are easy to estimate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tim said:

Nope. But perhaps you can help with something I have been wondering about forever.

So, Betelgeuse goes SN. How long until we see it from earth the same apparent size as M57? M27? NGC 6990-6992 ?

Thanks. I can't do maths, don't have the brain.

:)

Haven't got the data to hand but a quick back of envelope calculation suggests that the crab nebula is about 10 times the distance so it would take about a century to reach the same apparent size. ( crab nebula is 6500 ly distant and was seen to gov nova in 1054, Betelgeuse is about 650 ly distant)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if it helps, Orion nebula is estimated to have 2000 solar masses.

I wonder if there is something like average density of emission nebulae - that, coupled with diameter would give you estimate of their masses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is interesting read:

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/E/Emission+Nebula

" Their mass generally ranges from 100 to 10,000 solar masses and this material can be spread over a volume of less than light year to several hundred light years. For this reason, their densities are highly varied, ranging from millions of atoms/cm3 to only a few atoms/cm3 depending on the compactness of the nebula. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.