Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi 

I have a Skywatcher 200PDS. I managed to get images of saturn, jupiter with the telescope and the ASI120MC-S camera. However, to get a bit more magnified image of these planets I got myself a Barlow Tele Vue 3x and Revelation 5x. I am having trouble with this setup and really disappointed now. I am not able to achieve focus with any of these barlows using my planetary camera. I have added extension etc. but no luck whatsover. I just see a blank black video preview in SharpCap. I have seen people using the same setup and getting good images out of those. Any help highly appreciated.


Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have an out of focus image or no image at all? If it is the latter then the problem could easily be that your object is not centred on your chip. As you add magnification in the form of a Barlow it becomes much more challenging to centre your object.  Try increasing the gain on your image capture to see if part of the fov is brighter, then slew towards this and centre the object. Remember to re adjust your gain before capture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Owmuchonomy said:

Do you have an out of focus image or no image at all? If it is the latter then the problem could easily be that your object is not centred on your chip. As you add magnification in the form of a Barlow it becomes much more challenging to centre your object.  Try increasing the gain on your image capture to see if part of the fov is brighter, then slew towards this and centre the object. Remember to re adjust your gain before capture.

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking. 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found that with planetary cameras, unless the image of a planet is almost in focus, you can't see anything at all.  I had some trouble till I worked out ways of pre-focusing the system so that the camera would be near focus when I dropped it in.  (I focus my Mak and SCT with the eyepiece held about 6mm out of its normal position, then drop in the camera.) 

It is also possible that with the Barlow in place, your system is not capable of reaching focus - something you can most readily test on the edge of the Moon or a distant terrestrial target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Yogesh said:

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking.

I use an x3 barlow with a 1200mm scope and an ASI120MC which has the same size chip

My experience is that there's no guarantee this will work, especially with stronger barlows.

I setup using the moon as a target, and get my finderscope VERY accurately aligned using an obvious crater, and tweak once you have a planet in view. I find it is still unlikely that a planet will be on the chip after putting the scope away and getting it out again.

With an x5 barlow, it will be exceptionally demanding to find the planet and exceptional difficult to focus accurately. The action of focusing will probably send the planet out of the field of view until you develop a very delicate touch.

Another trick (if the moon is hidden) is to defocus and use a very long exposure (about a second) and use a bright star (or jupiter/mars) as a target as they  will show a halo even if outside the frame.

The HEQ5 goto will struggle to accurately target planets at that focal length, so setting the finder is a challenge and it must be used. I set the planet in one of the 'corners' of the crosshair's x as when it is hidden by the X it can actually be slightly off centre and the cameras Field of view isn't much bigger than where the crosshairs cross!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Yogesh said:

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What I did was to get the image focused on the chip with out using any barlow and then simply insert the barlow and then tried to focus again. I must mention that I am using HEQ5 pro for tracking. 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

 

That method is unreliable because the action of placing the Barlow in the image train moves the previously centred image away from the chip. You need to recentre once the Barlow is in place using the method I describe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found that the seeing conditions have never been good enough or steady enough for my x3 Barlow.. it's never been a better image than without it..see it as a waste of time.. Maybe a x2 would be better for me but I'm not going to waste my money trying with a average costing Barlow.i will get a powermate one day.. I see a Barlow as like a high strength ep..as a e.g. a 25mm is going to give you the best views so why try try a 5mm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

I use an x3 barlow with a 1200mm scope and an ASI120MC which has the same size chip

My experience is that there's no guarantee this will work, especially with stronger barlows.

I setup using the moon as a target, and get my finderscope VERY accurately aligned using an obvious crater, and tweak once you have a planet in view. I find it is still unlikely that a planet will be on the chip after putting the scope away and getting it out again.

With an x5 barlow, it will be exceptionally demanding to find the planet and exceptional difficult to focus accurately. The action of focusing will probably send the planet out of the field of view until you develop a very delicate touch.

Another trick (if the moon is hidden) is to defocus and use a very long exposure (about a second) and use a bright star (or jupiter/mars) as a target as they  will show a halo even if outside the frame.

The HEQ5 goto will struggle to accurately target planets at that focal length, so setting the finder is a challenge and it must be used. I set the planet in one of the 'corners' of the crosshair's x as when it is hidden by the X it can actually be slightly off centre and the cameras Field of view isn't much bigger than where the crosshairs cross!

Hi 

 

Thanks a lot for your reply. That is some good tip. I did not really realize untill you mentioned that the fov is that small. I suppose I was taking some things for granted in my head. Thanks! I will try it on the moon to start with next time. 


Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Owmuchonomy said:

That method is unreliable because the action of placing the Barlow in the image train moves the previously centred image away from the chip. You need to recentre once the Barlow is in place using the method I describe.

Thanks again. I really appreciate you replying back. I am definitely going to try what you suggested , increasing the gain and re-centering next time. I will keep this thread updated if i manage to succeed or not . 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, newbie alert said:

I've found that the seeing conditions have never been good enough or steady enough for my x3 Barlow.. it's never been a better image than without it..see it as a waste of time.. Maybe a x2 would be better for me but I'm not going to waste my money trying with a average costing Barlow.i will get a powermate one day.. I see a Barlow as like a high strength ep..as a e.g. a 25mm is going to give you the best views so why try try a 5mm

Hi 

Thanks for your reply. What is the difference between a barlow and a powermate ? Are you suggesting that in the long run it would be good to get a powermate ? Do you recommend any ?

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Powermate are made by televue..but they also do barlows ..what the difference is I'm not sure..but all  serious  planetary imagers use them..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A barlow spreads the light rays out wider. A powermate magnifies without doing this. This makes it less sensitive to spacing (barlows get more powerful as you increase the spacing) 

Lots of planetary imagers use them because of the quality, but the practical advantages are actually greater for visual astronomers (things like exit pupil size that are irrelevant to imagers).

http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_page.asp?id=53&Tab=_app

I wouldn't get too hung up on what to use as even mid-price barlows are very good because they are optically pretty straightforward. I'm only just gettin g to eth point where I'm thinking a better barlow or powermate could improve my planetary imaging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By masjstovel
      Hi,
      I bought my first telescope, SW 150pds about 6 months ago with the purpose of astroimaging "when i feel ready".  So far ive used my Nikon D810 for that, and I'm now  planning on taking the step buying my first AP camera.
      My targets would be DSO's, and not planetary. I want a mono-camera, not color. 

      I want to get away with a very good camera to a reasonable price (wouldn't we all...) and in this regard I've been drooling on the ZWO ASI 1600MM Mono for some time. The price for it is in the upper part of my budget, but I'm willing to if its worth it.  I've seen from other treads that sensor-size isn't everything, and dynamic range and gain and all is just as important, but i have trouble understanding it all 100% when it's all new to me, but in my experience i am a practical person who learns things much better and faster with the gear in my hand. So without getting to technical, and staying as objective as possible - please help me with; 

      1. Is this a good camera to go for?
      2. It's sold with options of filters 1.25", 31mm or 36mm - Why these options, and what determines what i would choose?

      3. Would you go for another camera in this price range, and why? - Or to rephrase it a bit; If you were in my shoes, which camera would you og for?

      I'd appreciate any help:)

      I might add, that i understand that with my lack of experience, buying a mono-camera with filters and all might seem premature, but for some strange reason. I enjoy these "way over my head"-projects and figuring  out things as time goes - I just need some guiding in the right direction. 
    • By Waynescave
      Hi guys
      Can anyone identify which control box this is? Is it focusmaster? And does it run off robofocus driver in Indi lib as I cannot get a successful connection (in indi within ekos) 
      I bought a robofocus motor with this control box second hand. 
      I have faith with seller that hardware works as should. 
      I've tried other cables and USB ports too. The software (k stars) I use does do port search when connecting equipment.. 
       
      Any help appreciated 
      Wayne

    • By Greg6498
      After receiving great advice from this group, I decided to purchase this TeleVue 2x Barlow! It's going on my Skywatcher Evostar Pro 80mm. I have an ES 6.7 eyepiece I want to use with it. Can’t wait to give it a go!

    • By hennyvenom
      Hello everyone, I've got a question.
      I want to upgrade the visual back on the Mak 127. The standard back on the Mak is not pleasant to work with as seen in the image. I need to get rid of this plastic thing. I purchased a mak to sct adapter when I bought the scope, I never got around to doing anything until now as I've just acquired a Baader 2.25x barlow as shown in the image.
      Now, I've had a go of attaching the the Baader Barlow into the original plastic thing on the mak, it works .... but I'm not happy with the connection being made with the two locking screws, as there is still movement when the barlow, t-ring and Canon DSLR are all in the train.
      I've been having a look on FLO for some work around, does anyone have some input as to whether this will work.
      Mak to sct adapter-> Baader 2 inch to 1.25 reducer adapter->Baader 2.25x barlow + T ring & DSLR
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/baader-2-to-125-reducer-adapter.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/BaaderT2ext-1508153.html
      Any input or a better way of securing everything is greatly appreciated!😊




      Another option I've come across is this , Baader ClickLock 2"-1.25" Adapter  and Baader T2 Extension Tube to bring it to 40mm when attached to the mak to sct adapter. Anyone have any experience with this? 
    • By Richard Shaw
      I acquired a second hand Coronado PST. The focus knob doesn't seem to have any effect on the image and, although it turns, it feels as if something inside the scope is "slipping".
      Is it worth opening up and taking a look to see the focus knob in action?
      Is there anywhere that services the PST without sending it outside the UK?
      Are there any nasty surprises if I open it up (springs, pressure points etc)?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.