Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_terminator_challenge_winners.thumb.jpg.6becf44442bc7105be59da91b2bee295.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have recently purchased a ZWO ASI120MC-S webcam from FLO. I wanted to try it the other night so I decided to get some test images for the moon. I was using Sharpcap for this. I manged to get the video and was using Autostakkert to stack it. On the final stacked image I can see that there are some strange vertical lines.  I have attached a picture of that. There is also a zoomed in image of a region and I can see some small squares almost resembling the pixels on the sensor. Below are my capture settings as given by SharpCap.

[ZWO ASI120MC-S]
Debayer Preview=On
Pan=0
Tilt=0
Output Format=AVI files (*.avi)
Binning=1
Capture Area=1280x960
Colour Space=RAW8
Temperature=19.2
High Speed Mode=Off
Overclock=0
Turbo USB=86(Auto)
Flip=Both
Frame Rate Limit=60 fps
Gain=50(Auto)
Exposure=0.001993
Timestamp Frames=Off
White Bal (B)=95
White Bal (R)=52
Brightness=0
Auto Exp Max Gain=50
Auto Exp Max Exp M S=30000
Auto Exp Target Brightness=100
Mono Bin=Off
Apply Flat=None
Subtract Dark=None
#Black Point
Display Black Point=0
#MidTone Point
Display MidTone Point=0.5
#White Point
Display White Point=1
TimeStamp=2018-06-25T23:13:22.6772909Z
SharpCapVersion=3.1.5214.0

For Autostakkert (v2.6.8 ) I was not doing anything fancy. Pressed analyze and then used 50% of the frames to stack. Used 200 as the AP size. Also, had the drizzle as 1.5x

My camera was mounted to a skywatcher 200pds  and HEQ5 mount.

I am failing to understand what is going wrong here. Is the camera a problem or stacking is an issue ? Please let me know if there is any more information that you need.
 

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

moon_25062018_1min_00_13_20_g4_ap35_Drizzle15.tif

moon_25062018_1min_00_13_20_g4_ap35_Drizzle15_ZOOM.tif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Cornelius Varley said:

Try running the .avi file through PIPP prior to stacking to debayer the image file. 

Thanks a lot  for your response Peter. I have now uploaded my original video I took using the camera to this link https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NhDq3WiuMnKYk-zK7MQdDTfgSDdI5EAZ. It is a 2GB video. There is turbulence in the atmosphere which can be seen in the video and also I can see the same square shaped pixelations in the video. Is this expected? Are my settings to capture the video correct. I mean the exposure, gain, colour space etc. Please do let me know. I will use PIPP and will post some results here soon.

Thanks and Regards,

Yogesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Avi processed through PIPP to debayer, then stacked in AS and minor wavelets in Registax. The 120mc-s is a colour camera but to improve download speeds the avi is stored as a mono file, retaining the colour info. PIPP restores the colour data to the video for further processing as a colour video. If the video is not de-bayered you get a checker-board effect across the image.

2009039179_wavelets_00_13_20(1)_pipp_g4_ap3039.thumb.jpg.a6ba24d1f25cfc74359948145538df4f.jpg

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter, 

Thanks for your time to go through my video and getting that image. Quite impressive I must say. This was my first time doing this. So can you please let me know what settings did you use on autostakkert and the Registax wavelet filter. I tried but mine is no where near.

Based on my video which you had a chance to look, can I safely assume that there is no problem with my camera. Asking because I was about to return it. 

Please do let me know.

Thanks and Regards, 

Yogesh 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Autostakkert I just let the programme do its thing and then some slight wavelet adjustments in channel 2 and 3 (about 25 in each) in Registax.

Nothing wrong in your camera, just remember to run the avi through PIPP to debayer it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Peter, 

Thank you so much for your response. Can I ask  you some more favours please. Is it possible you could post some screenshot here for my reference for the Registax wavelet stuff. This is just for my reference. If you have any information on Registax tutorial etc I would love that as well. 

Can you please check my sharpcap settings and suggest any improvements. I think in the video there is a bit of highlights which has blown out completely. 

Thanks again. 

 

Thanks and Regards, 

Yogesh 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

registax.thumb.PNG.95d294fe0c43647e4bce6e08ae6975dc.PNG

The image is a little overexposed in the bottom left corner. Adjust the exposure controls so that the brightest areas are just slightly under exposed to retain the detail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By TakMan
      Sunday 30th June.
      NLCs started appearing as the skies cleared around 1.45am.
      Grabbed gear and headed off around 2.15am to the same location as last two sessions. Another 90 shots taken!
      Nikon D3 and Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II, tripod mounted, cable release and mirror lock function.
      Lightly processed in Adobe Lightroom and (where required), stitched shots together in Photoshop CC2017
      Taken from north Lichfield (Staffordshire).
      Clicking the pictures should open the hi-res images.
      Panoramic 1 - 7 shots. ISO 200, 2.5 sec, f/2.8, 70mm, 2.56am. Note over in the far right the Pleiades.

       
      Panoramic 2 (Detail) - 4 shots. ISO 200, 2.5 sec, f/2.8, 200mm, 3.01am

      'The Saucepan and NLCs' - Single shot - (Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8G ED). ISO 200, 2 sec, f/2.8, 24mm, 3.22am

       
      Started to pack away just as 'Mr Blackbird' started to sing - the dawn chorus broke.... then noticed a beautiful sight over in the East, switched back to the Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II and added the TC-14EII 1.4x
      A 7% Crescent Moon.
      Single shot - ISO 200, 0.8 sec, f/4, 280mm, 3.28am

       
      Damian
       
    • By Ruud
      Yesterday's Moon with the straight wall. Rupes Recta (middle right) and the crater Pitatus (bottom left).

    • By Demonperformer
      The other night, I got a rather weird thing happen using Sharpcap. In live-stacking, the first image arrived and it was full of stars. So, without changing any settings, I did a "platesolve" (which also realigns the scope) to centralise my target. It did its single frame capture and I got a practically blank screen and a message saying it could only detect 3 stars. I tried reducing the "sigma" setting, as advised by the on-screen message, with little effect. What gets me is that the same settings produced a whole mass of stars in each of the subs that were being live-stacked. Never had this happen to me before, and no, of course I didn't do anything intelligent like saving the log file!
      I can always try to replicate this next time (although I always find trying to replicate something that isn't working to be a weird activity in itself!), but on the off-chance that anyone can see what was happening without the log file, I thought I would ask.
      Thanks.
    • By stardude07
      Hello,
      I am wanting (not really 😪) to sell my Stellarvue SV105-3SV with tube rings [not shown in pictures]. The telescope is in great condition with very little dust and no scratches. There is one very small ding in the dew shield paint but it is not dented and it is almost not even noticeable. It happened when I took the telescope out of the saddle and it lightly hit the saddle. The telescope has never been dropped or had any issues and is optically perfect with a strehl of .95 or higher (claimed by Stellarvue).
      I've only used this telescope for imaging however I've once or twice thrown an eyepiece in it during a star party or two and it's VERY crisp with no false color.
      Currently I live in Italy so that's where it can be picked up or shipped from. Price is negotiable however Stellarvue says it is worth around $1200-$1500 USD. The nice thing is you wouldn't have any VAT from Stellarvue . Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or are interested.
      Lastly, here is a link to some images that I've taken with it and what it looks like mounted up: https://www.astrobin.com/users/chriscorkill/
      SV105-3SV Specifications
      Aperture: 105mm Apochromatic Precision Triplet Focuser: 3" Dual Speed Focuser with 2" and 1.25" eye piece adapters F Ratio: f/7 Focal Length: 735mm Color Correction: Excellent Minimum Tube Length: 16" in travel mode Tube Diameter: ~ 4-1/8" (105mm) Dew Shield Diameter: ~ 5-3/8" (137mm) OTA Weight: ~12lbs (5.4kg) Retractable Dewshield: Yes


    • By stardude07
      Hello,
      I have a question about filterwheels; SBIG filter wheels specifically. As far as I know they are the only ones that really use the 8 position filter wheels. So I have it loaded with L, R, G, B, Ha, OIII, and SII. So that is seven filters, what goes in the 8th slot???
      Thank you for your insight,
      Christopher
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.