Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Ahgii

M13-First time doing long exposure astrophotography

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

Few days ago i tried imaging a deep sky object for the first time, so i tried m13 as an easy first target, I used took 7  lights, out of witch i selected 3 for stacking, and used 5 darks. DSS only selected 1 frame out of the 3 and stacked that. The result wasn't that good but then again....it's the first time i'm doing this. Settings were iso 6400, 15 second exposure, auto WB. I have also been having this problem, when my telescope slews to a target, it's always to the left of the frame and that was a bummer since i had to crop my picture. Please give me your advice and feedback, Clear skies!

 

M13 6-11-2018.jpg

Edited by Ahgii
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Forunke said:

Did you try the SkyAlign feature?

If you use it on Stars near your target it should increase the accuracy 

I used auto 2 star with vega and arcturus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm... I rarely used any handcontroller but maybe try to recenter it yourself.

If your target is rather bright you should be able to set the ISO to max and see your target in live view. Then adjust with the controller.

The Skywatcher handcontroller had a way to manually update the position of objects. I don't quite remember the procedure though.

It was something like, goto an object, recenter it then either press esc once then again and hold it or hold esc, then press it again.

It then would ask if the coordinates should be updated. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeah the sync feature, i should use that too, but i have to take my camera off the telescope and look trough the eyepiece if it's a relatively faint object like M13.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Ahgii said:

I used took 7  lights, out of witch i selected 3 for stacking, and used 5 darks. DSS only selected 1 frame out of the 3 and stacked that.

Nice first catch.

If DSS only selected one image, it didn't do any real stacking. What we're seeing is actually the one image that you and DSS considered best.

My advice: put all 7 images in DSS and let it stack all 7. You will se a decrease in noise.

Which telescope/lens did you use for this target? Even at 15 seconds you have some trailing. You could try reducing the exposure time even more and stack LOTS of frames. You'll be amazed at how this will improve the final image.

Good luck, and have fun

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, wimvb said:

Nice first catch.

If DSS only selected one image, it didn't do any real stacking. What we're seeing is actually the one image that you and DSS considered best.

My advice: put all 7 images in DSS and let it stack all 7. You will se a decrease in noise.

Which telescope/lens did you use for this target? Even at 15 seconds you have some trailing. You could try reducing the exposure time even more and stack LOTS of frames. You'll be amazed at how this will improve the final image.

Good luck, and have fun

I used the nexstar 8SE with the stock alt-az mount. I heard you could get up to 30 seconds without trailing with good alignment. But with a globular cluster you can notice trailing much more than you could with a normal DSO. What other easy targets would you suggest for me in this time of year. I would really like to image a nebula of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Emission) nebulae require two things: 1. a camera that can register Ha signal; either a modded dslr or a dedicated astro camera. And 2. a tracking eq mount or at least a barn door tracker, if you use a dslr with a wide angle lens.

Nebulae are much dimmer than stars, and most dslrs have a low response in their wavelength range. So you need to expose your subs as long as possible. With short exposures you won't reveal any more than the brightest parts of some. Clusters are possible, as are bright planetary nebulae, such as M27 and M57. There are quite a few globular and open clusters in good view at this time of year. Locate them on a star chart or a stellarium program. If you want to test your equipment on an emission nebula, the heart neb in cassiopeia and the Cygnus wall in the North America nebula in Cygnus are among the brightest. Capture them with a fast camera lens attached to your tracking mount. But don't expect too much. There is a non eq thread in the (beginners) imaging section that has a lot of useful information.

Good luck.

Ps

If you don't have it already: pick up a copy of the book "making every photon count" by Steve Richards (@steppenwolf on this forum). It's available from our sponsor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to use a DSLR with the 8se.

If you are getting trailing at 15s, cut down to 10s. Even allowing for download time, you should get at least 4/min.

So set it to take 120 subs which will only take about half an hour. Then put them all into DSS and let it select and stack the best 75%. This will give you an image with 60x the integrated time of the one above and the difference will amaze you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/06/2018 at 09:10, wimvb said:

(Emission) nebulae require two things: 1. a camera that can register Ha signal; either a modded dslr or a dedicated astro camera. And 2. a tracking eq mount or at least a barn door tracker, if you use a dslr with a wide angle lens.

Nebulae are much dimmer than stars, and most dslrs have a low response in their wavelength range. So you need to expose your subs as long as possible. With short exposures you won't reveal any more than the brightest parts of some. Clusters are possible, as are bright planetary nebulae, such as M27 and M57. There are quite a few globular and open clusters in good view at this time of year. Locate them on a star chart or a stellarium program. If you want to test your equipment on an emission nebula, the heart neb in cassiopeia and the Cygnus wall in the North America nebula in Cygnus are among the brightest. Capture them with a fast camera lens attached to your tracking mount. But don't expect too much. There is a non eq thread in the (beginners) imaging section that has a lot of useful information.

Good luck.

Ps

If you don't have it already: pick up a copy of the book "making every photon count" by Steve Richards (@steppenwolf on this forum). It's available from our sponsor.

Well normal unmodified cameras still pick up Ha Wavelenghth, but not as much as a modded camera, I use my camera for normal photography as well, won't a Hydrogen-Alpha Filter have the same effect as a modded camera?

Edited by Ahgii

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ahgii said:

won't a Hydrogen-Alpha Filter have the same effect as a modded camera?

No, since the built in filter partially blocks Ha. With Ha filter you have one which decreases Ha (built in) and one which isolates it. If you remove the built in filter, you'll be better off. You use a(n) Ha filter not to get more Ha, but to get less everything else. Filters don't amplify signal, they can only block (unwanted) signal.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By grievous
      Hello! I have a question on how can I mount my camera to my Sky-Watcher Starquest 130P telescope? I’ve watched so many videos about it and there’s so many different answers on what I need to do that. At the moment, I have 2x Barlow lens and a DSLR. I know that a T-ring is also necessary but is there anything more? Any help is highly appreciated, thanks! (I’m really new to telescopes and astrophotography in general so I hope I don’t say anything dumb)
    • By beka
      Hi All,
      Having had to move to an apartment where I could not use my CPC 1100, I decided that I have to see what I could do with my NexStar SLT 102 (alt-az achromatic 102mm f6.47 refractor). Setting up on my narrow balcony was challenging and the altitude bearing was so loose that it almost moved from the weight of the Canon 700D. I could not see M31 in the estimated 3.5 magnitude sky so I did a two star alignment and used the live-view to focus on a bright star. I then took a 15 second exposure after slewing to M31 which allowed me to see that I had it in the field of view. After a few more 15 second exposures and playing with the motion controls I managed to get it centered. The resulting picture is from 39 subs of 30 seconds at ISO 1600, 9 flats. The images were stacked and stretched with Siril and then I played with the curves on Gimp, cropped and scaled. Not too unhappy.
       

    • By astrosathya
      Just thought i'll bring this up as a point of discussion. Today, cooled CMOS Astro Cameras are available in plenty. QHY, ZWO and other variants of the same camera are selling for very reasonable prices. However, there was a point of time when astrophotographers used to cool down their DSLR's as a cheap OSC alternative to CCD cameras. Give a choice, I would've purchased a dedicated CMOS OSC which can cool to 40 C below ambient, but since I had a Canon 500D which I had self modded, I requested a friend Kaustav Chatterjee (an avid model railroader) to cold mod my 500D (he had cold modded his 1000D long back). This newly modded camera has a TEC12703 single peltier and cools to approximately 20 below ambient.What do you guys think?




    • By lux eterna
      Hi all,
      This is 6 hours (30 x 12 min), taken with my modded Nikon D7000 @iso200 and Astronomik 12 nm Ha 2" filter on Meade LX200-ACF with reducer (=1600 mm FL @ F8). Guided with NexGuide on HEQ5 Pro.
      The plan was to do a Ha O3 bicolour on this target, but the O3 may be a future thing due to weather conditions.
      I usually remove the stars during part of my processing workflow and put them back later on, but this time I think the nebulosity and dust came out best without them. I did however try to find out which stars belong to Melotte 15 and include only those, just to portrait the Melotte 15 without anything between it and us, but I could not find that info.
      Processed with DSS, Starnet and PS.
      Ragnar

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.