Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters.thumb.jpg.b518052b915c2cf31f5f12e33ce0e9d2.jpg

Recommended Posts

The TSA120/AZEQ6 arrived a while back and I was lucky enough to try it out tonight. This is just a brief report with more to come as I gain experience with this telescope. I'll get to the point here... even with Jupiter low and the seeing avg the TSA120 gave me the best view of Jupiter through a refractor so far... I can only imagine them when the planet is higher. The colors were very deep and with much detail showing in the belts and really fine shade lines through the caps were coming through.

The eyepieces used were the Zeiss 25.1-6.7/VIP barlow, 3-6 Nagler zoom and a 4mm UO ortho. The finder EP is the 42mm LVW and a Baader prism diag held the EP's.

Well, Izar can be a good test of things and the scope came through with flying colors- I love that little bright blue ball sitting on the bigger star. The optics of this refractor are good enough to show up eyepiece differences, even at this small aperture. Yup, the 3-6 Nagler got beat on Izar, with the Zeiss producing a much cleaner "tighter" look. The 3-6 zoom does do well in the color dept on Jupiter however and will stay in the collection. The Zeiss zoom also bested the 3-6NZ on Jupiter overall.

If asked to describe the look through the TSA120 I would call it "surgical" or precise, razor like. My own preference is for triplet refractors but the doublets may produce richer colors on some things-  I do play around with different tone EP's and that prism diag to get the colors where I want- and they are excellent in this scope. The UO 4mm, while giving sharp views, did not give me the color tone I wanted for this set up so its out...

I like the TSA120 already, after one brief night out :thumbsup:

ps- this scope will be killer on Saturn

  • Like 17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff Gerry! No real surprises I guess, but good to hear it is loving up to expectations so far :) 

How was the AZEQ6?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulation on you're new scope, I'm glad it's living up to/exceeding? expectations.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice!

I'm also split between doublets and triplets, own one of each type in 80mm, don't know what to prefer in bigger glass if I ever get one.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Gerry on your new setup and first light. Those Taks are wonderful scopes that will last a lifetime 👍🙂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Gerry.... they are lovely scopes and very well put together 😀 I also had a good night at the dark site and had some lovely views of Jupiter. Great to read your first impressions of the scope are good 🔭 surgical is a good description 📐

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Stu said:

How was the AZEQ6?

Thanks Stu, the AZEQ6 is a vg but hvy mount. I figured out how to align it and will work on getting the accuracy up a bit. I guess it should be really level lol! Even with the clamshell the settling time was just over a second and the tripod was not firmly in the grass. I'm getting a TPI leg spreader battery tray which is highly recommended. The CDN GPS module I bought works a dream btw...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Lockie said:

I'm glad it's living up to/exceeding? expectations.

When I started writing this first light report I said to myself that I won't make it seem that this Tak is so much better than other telescopes. I purposely understated how well this scope works Chris- it is extremely good. Even under avg conditions, with Jupiter low the 120mm + the HR2.4 at 375x showed the GRS well, riffles in the bands and polar shading. Many other things were tried and once again this telescope is top notch.

I don't want to make it seem like other scopes are not good though, Gerry

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Ben the Ignorant said:

I'm also split between doublets and triplets,

Thanks Ben!

I'm not split on this though...:hiding:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jetstream said:

Thanks Stu, the AZEQ6 is a vg but hvy mount. I figured out how to align it and will work on getting the accuracy up a bit. I guess it should be really level lol! Even with the clamshell the settling time was just over a second and the tripod was not firmly in the grass. I'm getting a TPI leg spreader battery tray which is highly recommended. The CDN GPS module I bought works a dream btw...

They are excellent but as you say, heavy. Will you be able to leave it permanently installed somewhere?

I assume you were using it in AZ mode?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Stu said:

They are excellent but as you say, heavy. Will you be able to leave it permanently installed somewhere?

I assume you were using it in AZ mode?

Once the construction is done up on the ridge I may have a permanent spot for it but I have a problem...big red pines and white pines. I need to move around to get open spots for different objects, but we'll see. I love the trees so they are staying. This is a great mount Stu, thanks for the advice btw!

Forgot to mention- AZ mode.

Edited by jetstream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, jetstream said:

When I started writing this first light report I said to myself that I won't make it seem that this Tak is so much better than other telescopes. I purposely understated how well this scope works Chris- it is extremely good. Even under avg conditions, with Jupiter low the 120mm + the HR2.4 at 375x showed the GRS well, riffles in the bands and polar shading. Many other things were tried and once again this telescope is top notch.

I don't want to make it seem like other scopes are not good though, Gerry

Nice! It seems you do get what you pay for :) Despite having some great views of Jupiter over the years, I'm not sure I've managed to see that much detail on Jupiter at anything close to 375x, expecially with the low altitude and average seeing...very impressive!  

Edited by Lockie
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 11/06/2018 at 14:50, jetstream said:

When I started writing this first light report I said to myself that I won't make it seem that this Tak is so much better than other telescopes. I purposely understated how well this scope works Chris- it is extremely good. Even under avg conditions, with Jupiter low the 120mm + the HR2.4 at 375x showed the GRS well, riffles in the bands and polar shading. Many other things were tried and once again this telescope is top notch.

I don't want to make it seem like other scopes are not good though, Gerry

Gerry you have report on what your findings are..... if people think it is boasting then quite frankly that’s their problem. I for one prefer honesty every time, and I do not write reports based on what folk want to hear 😀 The Taks are quite simply very good scopes and you my friend just happen to have a very nice example.

Edited by Pig
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shaun, this scope has the fastest, best "snap" focus" of all my scopes, just ahead of my 15" dob. My first view through it was across the bay at about 800 yds, at the trees. The 3-6 Nagler popped the trees into razor sharp view at 150x... unheard of in the other fracs- from this I knew it was going to be good.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jetstream said:

Thanks Shaun, this scope has the fastest, best "snap" focus" of all my scopes, just ahead of my 15" dob. My first view through it was across the bay at about 800 yds, at the trees. The 3-6 Nagler popped the trees into razor sharp view at 150x... unheard of in the other fracs- from this I knew it was going to be good.

Yes Gerry they really do just snap into focus...... I guess I am just going to have to get the 120 then 😀

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear that your TSA120 is impressive Gerry :icon_biggrin:

I was very seriously considering one the year before last but a TMB/LZOS 130 F/9.2 triplet came along instead.

Interesting that such scopes are labelled "Super Apochromats" isn't it ?

I'm sure that term has sparked many a lively thread on a forum :icon_biggrin:

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumbsup: Great report Gerry, and glad to hear that it's all working very well! 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, John said:

Good to hear that your TSA120 is impressive Gerry :icon_biggrin:

I was very seriously considering one the year before last but a TMB/LZOS 130 F/9.2 triplet came along instead.

Interesting that such scopes are labelled "Super Apochromats" isn't it ?

I'm sure that term has sparked many a lively thread on a forum :icon_biggrin:

 

I can see why they call the "Super Apochromats" John!

As you know I considered the same scope you have along with a TEC 140. Rumors abound that the recent LZOS is not the old LZOS so I scratched that scope off the dance card but I don't know that any of the rumor is true. I am glad I didn't pick an oil spaced lens after viewing some images of leaks on another forum, simply because of my temps here. The TSA's air spaced triplet will serve me well.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations on your new telescope and mount Gerry, look forward to reading more from it. The TEC 140 is meant to be a stunner but very expensive.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jetstream said:

I can see why they call the "Super Apochromats" John!

As you know I considered the same scope you have along with a TEC 140. Rumors abound that the recent LZOS is not the old LZOS so I scratched that scope off the dance card but I don't know that any of the rumor is true. I am glad I didn't pick an oil spaced lens after viewing some images of leaks on another forum, simply because of my temps here. The TSA's air spaced triplet will serve me well.

Mine is a 2006 scope (#20) - an early one when Thomas Back was still with us (just). I've been in correspondance with Markus Ludes about my scope and others and, unless he is leading me astray, I believe that LZOS objectives are still what they were. They are not producing them any more though because the factory has had to concentrate on military optics. The 130mm F/9's will stop at 114 units made since 2005.

I'm pleased that you really like your TSA120. 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎06‎/‎2018 at 06:37, jetstream said:

The TSA120/AZEQ6 arrived a while back and I was lucky enough to try it out tonight.

Great set up Gerry, congrets.

Enjoy and clear skies, great to give it a succesfull first light.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/06/2018 at 01:59, John said:

Mine is a 2006 scope (#20) - an early one when Thomas Back was still with us (just). I've been in correspondance with Markus Ludes about my scope and others and, unless he is leading me astray, I believe that LZOS objectives are still what they were. They are not producing them any more though because the factory has had to concentrate on military optics. The 130mm F/9's will stop at 114 units made since 2005.

I'm pleased that you really like your TSA120. 

 

 

Your scope is the "best of the best" IMHO and must be a super performer. The LZOS lens is legendary and it is too bad that the factory has switched its market direction. Big loss for us actually.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/06/2018 at 07:59, John said:

Mine is a 2006 scope (#20) - an early one when Thomas Back was still with us (just). I've been in correspondance with Markus Ludes about my scope and others and, unless he is leading me astray, I believe that LZOS objectives are still what they were. They are not producing them any more though because the factory has had to concentrate on military optics. The 130mm F/9's will stop at 114 units made since 2005.

I'm pleased that you really like your TSA120. 

 

 

According to this post from Markus of APM, LZOS has agreed to continue making optics from 100mm to 510mm in size.

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/606354-apm-lzos-apos-for-sale-123-mm-180-mm/#entry8634315

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By rorymultistorey
      Hi Stargazers,
      After a lot of work and help from the great Damian Peach I managed to get some really good images of Jupiter Mars and Saturn despite a total spend of just £100... and I made another bonkers Astrobiscuit video about it which I hope you enjoy. Mr Peach really helped me pick my nights to image and the other big surprise was how good the canon 600D is at planetary. All comments/ advice/ criticisms most welcome...
       
       
       

    • By Matteo
      GSO 0.20 m 
      Sky-Watcher NEQ-5 Pro SynScan mount
      ASI 120MC + IR/UV Cut filter
      GSO barlow lens 5x (APO)
      ZWO IR/UV Cut filter
      f: 5000 mm
      f/25
      The newton in action! 😀
      Matteo Vacca Milis, Italy http://vaccamatteo.weebly.com/ https://www.astrobin.com/users/matteovacca/

    • By Stargazer33
      Sorry, I couldn't resist this after noticing how central the GRS was in my images! 😏
       

    • By Stargazer33
      This is a de-rotated image from the three videos used to make up my Jupiter rotation animation from earlier.
      The three stacked images from the videos were measured and derotated in WinJupos and stacked. This new de-rotated image had additional wavelets done in RS6 and final processing including a sharpened base layer and a top layer at 80% fill with a Gaussian blur attached.
      The original videos were 1000 frames; recorded in EZPlanetary, centred and cropped in PIPP, stacked in Autostakkert2, wavelets in RS6 and final processing in PS CS4 Extended.

       
      Equipment: C9.25, CGEM, RA 2.5x telextender, Zwo ADC, Neodymium filter, QHY5LIIc
    • By Stargazer33
      First time imaging since April of last year!
      Managed to grab three 1000 frame videos between it being dark enough for me to see Jupiter and it going behind the row of 40 foot Sycamore, Oak and Beech trees that back onto our garden.
      Scope: Celestron C9.25; Mount: CGEM; Camera: QHY5LIIc; Lens: Explore Scientific x3 Telextender; Capture Software: EZPlanetary
      3 x 1000 frame videos, centred and cropped in PIPP, stacked & RGB aligned in Autostakkert 2  with wavelets done in Registax 6; post processing and turning into a GIF. in PS CS4
      Seeing was very poor with some very high thin cloud. I think my focus was also off and as I haven't used my scope in anger for well over a year the collimation is probably way off. But hey-ho, at least I've finally managed to enter something into one of these competitions instead of living vicariously through others efforts! 🤪
       

       
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.