Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep21_banner.thumb.jpg.d744e66b98367f1c5d57b7966c303f1b.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
Uranium235

More CMOS galaxy bashing

Recommended Posts

Well... its been a good few days for AP eh?... apart from it not really getting dark until 10.30pm! So i did this over a couple of nights to see if the results from the last run were a fluke or not.

I think for this image you will have to ignore the odd star shapes - thats my fault! I was just to lazy to recalibrate PHD so there was a bit of elongation in RA. Even at this short(ish) focal length, its still possible to get punished for sloppy work as the size of the pixels will show up any shortcomings in guiding or PA.

So 94 subs later, I've put this one together. Calibration worked out ok, but I think to really make it shine it needs more subs. For all the read noise and QE advantages of CMOS, youre still going to need roughly the same overall exposure required as you would need for a good CCD version....possibly 5 hours+, as there are no free lunches in this game! :)

 

94x120s (UV/IR cut)

ASI178MM Cool, 130pds, NEQ6

Setpoint -25

 

Thanks for looking! :)

28108433298_276ae516d8_k.jpg

 

 

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.