Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Sun shots 21 and 22 April 2018


Recommended Posts

Firstly I would like to say a big thank you to everyone who posts on this forum. 

I restarted this hobby in November 2017 aged 49 having last viewed the stars as a kid using a pair of brass binoculars. Having joined SGL I have been an avid reader lurking in the background picking up tips, tricks, ideas and methods and so this is what I would call my first serious post.

Stargazing has been bit hit an miss since i purchased my Celestron Nexstar 6SE. In fact I joke that when I bought it the skies clouded over! Not to be deterred, I read that it is possible to view the sun through a telescope and despite all the warnings I thought I would give it a go. First up was my homemade Solar Filter which I made using the guidance notes from the Sky at Night Magazine. It was made using Baader AstroSolar Safety Film ND5 purchased from the good guys at FLO along with black A4 160 gsm card purchased via Amazon and a whole load of single and double sided sticky tape.

Cutting the card into 5cm strips and sticking them together to form one long strip allowed me to wrap the card around the circumference of the scope three times to create a solid ring. I then cut the safety film to size and then offered this up to the ring sticking down the overlapping film to the outside of the ring careful not to touch the film itself. A second ring made of similar card strips stuck together was then applied to cover the overlapping film.

A picture of the filter on my 6SE is below and as you can see it was necessary to cut out a 'notch' to accommodate the vixen mounting bar. 160gsm card is pretty tough stuff, especially when wrapped around six times so a pair of wire cutters did the trick. I later added two elastic bands around the ring to ensure that it remained securely on the scope.

IMG_0926.jpg

 

Both Saturday and Sunday (21 and 22 April) were very bright days and at 12.50pm I took the first image using my Nikon D90 mounted directly to my 6SE. A Celestron F6.3 focus reducer sat between the scope and T-mount/D90. This is single image at ISO 200 with the shutter set at 1/160th sec. Sun spots are clearly visible at the 10 o'clock position.

Sun 20180421.jpg

 

The following day I used the same set up at 11:46 am but used the LO 1 ISO setting with the shutter set at 1/500th sec. Again sun spots are visible but have moved lower.

Sun 20180422.jpg

The two single images were 'processed' using Photoshop Elements 2018. To be honest I tweaked a view knobs and moved a few slides to come up with what I have submitted today. Processing is a bit of a dark art and so the 'Dummies Guide to...' is sitting next to me as I type.

I hope you enjoy reading this post and viewing the images and I would really welcome your honest feedback. It's not the Horse head nebula but from small acorns.......

Cheers,

 

Hughsie

 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are excellent first Solar Images!  Welcome to the light side!!

To help:  Get the ISO as low as you can and try a shutter speed of 1/2000 sec (or nearest - if in doubt shorter - the Sun is very bright even through a Baader film!).  Then try taking a few dozen pictures and stacking them - you will be surprised at the result you will get.

Have a look here to help you get started: Solar imaging tutorial  and keep up the good work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A good start to your solar journey.

They look slightly over exposed, so as above try and reduce settings a bit to reduce exposure. I am not familiar with your cam but if it can take an AVI then that would be a good way to go to capture a few hundred images and then stack them in AS!3 and use ImPPG to sharpen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a very nice first image.  Well done.  I like the distribution of light better in the second one.  Welcome to the "Light Side"... you'll never be sorry.:icon_biggrin:

I hope you won't be offended, but I took your image and tweaked it a bit in IMPPG before throwing some color on.  I see some indication of surface granularity which is an indication that you had the focus pretty darn close.  I threw a magnified view of AR2706 from your image just for fun.

You did a good job.  The folks here will help with any questions... just ask.

Clear Skies

HUGHSIE FIRST SOLAR IMAGE.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Here is my second attempt. Photo taken today with the same gear. ISO Lo-1 and shutter speed 1/2500s. This is a single frame image then processed using Photoshop and Bizibilder's processing notes. Still to get my head around stacking....not having much success I'm afraid.

 

 

Sun 12500s LO-1iso 20180526 15h58m07s Text.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still finding my way with different equipment.

Here is 2712 again as of this morning. This time taken with my ZWO ASI 178MC rather than my Nikon D90 (first time out with the ZWO). Image stacked from an original 1,000 frames using Registax 5 and then run through Photoshop.

Looking at it I feel I have gone too hard with the wavelets after stacking. Also it is heavily cropped to remove errors as no flat field was taken.

Sol 28 May 2018 00 20 BST Text.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By chops
      I'm posting in the hope it helps anyone else considering a Daystar Scout SS60. The video's not quite representative of what one sees looking through the scope, but gives a general idea of field of view through a 24mm EP.  When observing, much more prominence detail and surface texture is visible to the eye and the colour feels less red than it appears in the vid.
      I'd have taken this video sooner if I'd realised that afocal video would work so well, so I'll try again next time the sun's available earlier in the day during better seeing. The video's taken by holding an iPhone against an Explore Scientific 24mm eyepiece and adjusting exposure (i.e. afocal video photography). Although I find a Plossl as easy (if not easier) to use as a wide EP for observing, it's simpler to align a smartphone with an eyepiece that has a wider field of view, for afocal video. Hence I used a 24mm ExSc (see below for detail). It seems a fairly quiet solar day, not long after the notoriously quiet 2020 and I believe is still close to the beginning of the sun's new 11 year cycle (hopefully it will become more exciting soon but not as exciting as having any Carrington Events pointing towards us).
      I spent some hours, from late morning, watching these prominences form, dissipate and reform. The prom on the Western limb was very tall and bright, looking like a large rectangular tower block, which gradually split, faded as the top looped over to the north, then the top looped back again to the south. At one point this loop appeared to join - forming the outline of the head of a man, whose figure, with arms out, was clear and rather funny. Wish I'd taken this video sooner (or had the ASI183 to hand). The prom quietened and reached its current state (3pm ish) as seen in the video.
      The long group of prominences to the South - 4 main and some smaller - were more dim than the prom on the Western limb initially, but they remained impressive, ranging from good to very small and appeared at one point to be as clear row of pine trees, especially the larger right hand prom, with spiky 'branches' and a distinctive triangular fir tree shape, which gradually brightened then faded to this view. The tip of the ‘sharks fin’ to the left of the group extended out to the east then receded.
      I'm afraid it's not easy to see the detail in such a simple video - it's slighly more visible to the naked eye. By the time I took this video it had gone 3pm, there was more haze and a lower sun and none of the prominences were particularly impressive.
      There were No sunspots easily visible, although a Plage appeared to be visible close to the Westerly limb. Little surface detail other than orange peel, despite tuning the scope (better with the SS60s dial to left of centre for this today). I still need to lots more time with the scope to get the best from it.
      I'm a Ha beginner having only observed in whitelight before and only having used this scope twice before, once in combination with a ZWO ASI 183MC astrophotography video camera. Medium seeing, 6/3/21 'third light' on the Daystar Scout SS60 Scope with fixed chromasphere quark built in - 930mm f15 60mm.
      Various Eye pieces used: Plossl 40mm, Meade Super Plossl 26mm, Explore Scientific 24mm and 11mm 82 and 68 degree EPs gave good clarity and contrast, but the seeing's not good enough for close viewing of proms.  ioptron motor, roughly pointed north was perfectly sufficiently good to keep the sun in view for at least 45 mins at a time. I'll edit this post to add a pic or two of the equipment setup in a moment.
      3 images attached are: Afocal Smartphone still image (contrast increased in smartphont), plus two shots of the setup.
       



    • By Stargazer33
      A quick process of video taken of the Sun from Saturday (2021-02-27).
      C9.25; CGEM; ASI385MC; Baader Solar Film homemade white light filter; Baader Neodymium filter.

    • By endless-sky
      After a 20 year long hiatus - my last astrophoto was captured with a film camera in 1997 - at the beginning of 2020 I decided it was time to start again.
      So, January 25th 2020 I brought home my used Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro and I immediately started taking photos. Obviously, my first target was M42 in Orion.
      This was my first digital astrophotography. 31 subframes, 30s each, taken at ISO800 with my unmodified Nikon D90, Nikkor 70-300mm at 300mm f/6.3 - January 28th, 2020, home front yard, Bortle 5/6 sky, no guiding, no filters. A grand total of 15.5 minutes...

      A couple of weeks later, me and my wife went to spend Valentine's weekend in the mountains. Of course I couldn't avoid taking advantage of the Bortle 4 sky and I took all my gear with me. Same target, 52 subframes, 45s each, taken at ISO800 with my unmodified Nikon D90, Nikkor 70-300mm at 300m f/5.6 - February 14th, 2020, Tonadico, Bortle 4 sky, no guiding, no filters. 39 minutes total integration.

      After I finished post-processing the second photograph, I was so happy with the result. It felt amazing that I was able to capture so many details and more nebulosity compared to the photo taken from home.
      Months passed, gear was changed. First one being the camera: at the end of February I bought a Nikon D5300 and a couple of months later I astromodified it on my own, adding a UV/IR cut filter in front of the sensor, after cutting it to size.
      In October the rest of the setup finally arrived: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series imaging telescope, Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4 guide scope and ZWO ASI 224MC guide camera. Also, an Optolong L-Pro 2" light pollution filter.
      After months of imaging and getting more experienced with PixInsight, it was just a matter of waiting before I could have another go at one of my favorite targets. And maybe give it a little more justice.
      This project took me more than a month, due to the rare clear nights opportunities I have had here lately.
      I started acquiring in January and finished a couple of weeks ago.
      M42 taken over 8 nights, under my Bortle 5/6 sky.
      Total integration time: 18h 04m 00s for the nebula. 714s (14s subs) + 2065s (35s subs) for the Trapezium and the core.
      Here are the acquisition details:
      Mount: Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro
      Telescope: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series
      Camera: D5300 astromodified
      Reducer/flattener: Tecnosky 4 elements, 0.8x
      Guide-scope: Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4
      Guide-camera: ZWO ASI 224MC
      2021/01/12: Number of subs/Exposure time: 33@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, no Moon
      2021/01/13: Number of subs/Exposure time: 33@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, no Moon
      2021/01/15: Number of subs/Exposure time: 38@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 8% illuminated
      2021/01/18: Number of subs/Exposure time: 36@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 30% illuminated
      2021/02/13: Number of subs/Exposure time: 30@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 4% illuminated
      2021/02/14: Number of subs/Exposure time: 23@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 9% illuminated
      2021/02/15: Number of subs/Exposure time: 51@14s + 48@35s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 15% illuminated
      2021/02/17: Number of subs/Exposure time: 11@35s + 38@180s + 1@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 30% illuminated
      Total exposure time (main integration): 65040s = 18h 04m 00s.
      Total exposure time (35s integration): 2065s.
      Total exposure time (14s integration): 714s.
      Pre and post-processing: PixInsight 1.8.8-7.
      Full HDR Version:

      Masked Stretch Version:

      Blended Version (50% HDR + 50% Masked Stretch):

      To my personal taste, I like the blended version the most. I think it brings out the best of both worlds (HDR and soft, less contrasty but more colorful look).
      I must say, I am very pleased and happy with the result. Not to boast, but I think I have come a long way since I started.
      Obviously the better gear and the much, much longer integration time helped.
      I think I actually spent more time post-processing it than acquiring it. Especially since I had to do the work almost twice: I post-processed the HDR and the Masked Stretch images separately, making sure I used the same processes and with the same strenght in both, so that I could combine them effectively, if I decided I didn’t like the look of the HDR alone. I also think I managed to tame the stars a lot more, compared to my previous post-processing attempts.
      As usual, here’s a link to the full resolution image(s): Orion Nebula (M42), De Mairan’s Nebula (M43) and Running Man (NGC 1977)
      Thanks for looking!
      C&C welcome!
       
    • By UkSpacenut
      Hey everyone. Have previously stumbled across this forum when searching for answers to questions, have finally made an account. 
      Last night I shot the moon for a couple of hours. I took around 10x3 minute videos and captured a little over 80,000 frames. My aim was to then create a lunar mosaic image but I have never done this before, and my technical ability seems to be adding to the confusion. 
      So to give some context, I used an ASI120MCS planetary camera through an 8" Skywatcher Skyliner 200p dobsonian. 
      I have read that ideally you would use a tracking mount to record sections of the moon at a time, however I sadly don't have that luxury. 
      I instead let the moon drift across the field of view and I'm pretty confident that among the 80,000 frames I have all the pieces of the moon as a whole. 
       
      What I'm now having issues with is how to break down these Avi files into frames which then can be used to create a mosaic. I need a "for dummies" guide ae thats what I'm feeling like currently. 
       
      Thank you in advance for any assistance you may be able to provide. :)
    • By Pincs
      Hi I've got an 8" dobsonian and I just got a dslr to connect to it. Obviously there's no tracking so what kind of things can I capture. Will I be able to do dso and planets?
      Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.