Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, coatesg said:

It makes a lot of sense from a linux point of view (remember Cygwin is used by AT, but is not maintained by the AT developers). Packages have inter-dependencies due to references against required libraries and the way that packages are built requiring certain versions - many of these libraries change on a regular basis due to bug/security fixes, or feature updates. It avoids the need for the AT guys to keep (essentially) their own copy of the cygwin distribution and to have to repackage it with their own software on a regular basis when there are security releases. There are also many instances where cygwin is already present on a client PC - you wouldn't want to force conflicts with any pre-existing Cygwin install, but rather let the relevant cygwin installer sort out itself what is needed.

Hi Graeme. I have been thinking about this, and, although I can see what you are saying, I don't think it addresses the point I am trying to make.

My AT installer is a 'fixed' piece of software - it does not alter with the changes made to cygwin. Somwhere within it is an instruction that equates to "go get cygwin", or more specifically "go get cygwin bits a, b, c, d, x, y & z". Now the content of these individual bits may alter as the program develops, but  presumably there are cygwin protocols in place such that getting these bits will always produce the desired result. The AT installer certainly doesn't know that the contents of a, b, etc have changed.

Now, when AT says "I am going to install cygwin", to me that tells me absolutely nothing useful - ok, it's telling me that I need cygwin (or some unspecified bits of it) and it's going to do it, but nothing more than that. And it restricts the machines upon which it can be installed. Whereas the comment "I am going to install cygwin bits a, b, c, d, x, y & z" would now make the package truly useable on any machine - connected to the internet or not. I could now go to the cygwin download site and know that I needed bits a, b, etc.

But this is the very information that is withheld, even in the case of so-called open source programs. And that is what I find so irritating.

Or am I still missing something?

Thanks.

Edited by Demonperformer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed that AT is very slow with TIFF files but if you convert the TIFF to JPG(8bit) it speeds up (and solves where the TIFF image fails) -  a lot - so Tiff image solved in 250 secs converted Tiff to JPG image solves in 29-40secs Blind. As I pointed out doing it manually you can alter the fields and "Down Scaling" does help - AT or Astrometry Software does not seem to like too many stars and that is what the Downscaler effect does - it reduces the number of stars used to build its solving algorithm(it seems) - so for example  my Tiff image produced 1200 reference stars, changing the "Down Scaler" reduces this to say 20 (depending of the DownScaler factor input) which then reduces the time and actually ,in some cases, goes from a negative to positive solve.  ASPS doesn't allow TIFF - only fit/jpg

Now I don't know if this reduces the accuracy (my AT setting was 1 arcmin for testing) but it works for me.

Be careful installing more  than one Cygwin as it can get confusing especially if you load the indexes manually - LOL - I admit it I put them in the wrong place and wondered why ASPS didn't use them!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - this may indicate more about the last tiem I installed AT, but the recommended method is now moving (with AT 0.8) to install the astrometry.net solver as a standalone from http://adgsoftware.com/ansvr/ - see FAQ at:

https://sourceforge.net/p/astrotortilla/home/FAQ/

ANSVR is a standalone installer so it looks like the cygwin portion will become redundant.

4 hours ago, Demonperformer said:

Now, when AT says "I am going to install cygwin", to me that tells me absolutely nothing useful - ok, it's telling me that I need cygwin (or some unspecified bits of it) and it's going to do it, but nothing more than that. And it restricts the machines upon which it can be installed. Whereas the comment "I am going to install cygwin bits a, b, c, d, x, y & z" would now make the package truly useable on any machine - connected to the internet or not. I could now go to the cygwin download site and know that I needed bits a, b, etc.

But this is the very information that is withheld, even in the case of so-called open source programs. And that is what I find so irritating.

But it's not really "withheld": A brief look in the AT source code gives me this file: https://sourceforge.net/p/astrotortilla/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/AstrometryNetPackages.txt - I presume that's enough to get astrometry.net running locally (and to build - so you might get away without the dev packages to just run it). However, a lot of people may see the code behind the project and then have a bit of a meltdown, and so providing an installer that does it all for you is a very friendly way of doing it.

(It also avoids dependency issues etc - it's not just that you need a, b, c and d, but you need versions of a,b,c and d that are all self consistent - packaging/automated dependency management ensures that; asking a human to download them manually doesn't. I've been into "dependency hell" before in administering Redhat and Debian based systems - albeit more complex than simply a cygwin install, but it's not a pleasant place to try and work your way out of sometimes :-/). 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am much more hopeful about ansvr. Just waiting to hear back about how to get round the download index files issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received a reply from Andy at ansvr and things look good.

I can confirm that ansvr installs its own cygwin package from the installer and does not require an extra download. The solution for the index files is:

Open the index file downloader from the start menu and click the folder button. Select the directory where the index files reside and it then displays a message that it has found the files and you can close the dialog box.

The good news is that when I went into Sharpcap, it had automatically detected the ansvr presence. Solved the standard M42 pic, with a full set of index files, in just over 2 minutes. Currently trying my NAN pic (which has over 5000 sources found - so don't expect miracle times!) again with all the index files. At this stage, I will be happy if it does not place it in Gemini!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, after over an hour it was still chuntering. Probably a combination of too many sources and too many index files. 

First change, increase to sigma to reduce sources to 218 and use only 41xx index files. It promptly failed due to "Too few sources". Don't really understand that.

Anyway, reduced sigma to generate just over 1000 sources. Currently chuntering using the 41xx files - objects 51-60.

Edited by Demonperformer
Autoincorrect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmmm ...

41xx totally failed to resolve.

This image did solve on astrometry.net website. Size was 21d x 15s.  So now trying with 4219》4213.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, that totally failed as well :hmh:

It did work with astrometry.net, so it can be done.

Can I ask anyone who has SC set up to platesolve, to give this image a go and upload the log file if it works so I can compare and see where things are diverging?

Thanks.

NAN.fits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Demonperformer said:

OK, that totally failed as well :hmh:

It did work with astrometry.net, so it can be done.

Can I ask anyone who has SC set up to platesolve, to give this image a go and upload the log file if it works so I can compare and see where things are diverging?

Thanks.

NAN.fits

Hi, what's your focal length and pixel size? I only have the index files I need installed, so if your resolution is vastly different from mine it wouldn't solve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without setting anything in Sharpcap - and just using the Test Controls for the Test Camera your file solved on my PC see attached log

new 2.txt

Now I haven't checked the DEC/RA results but it took about 12mins - it needs the Scaling factor IMHO to speed up but I can't find a way in sharpcap to alter that. Might try manual run of Astrotorilla

Edited by stash_old

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, cuivenion said:

Hi, what's your focal length and pixel size? I only have the index files I need installed, so if your resolution is vastly different from mine it wouldn't solve.

50mm focal length & 3.75 um pixels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, stash_old said:

Without setting anything in Sharpcap - and just using the Test Controls for the Test Camera your file solved on my PC see attached log

Thanks,  that's brilliant. I will go through it when I am back on the desktop and see if it gives me any hints. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ran your image against Astronometry.net and Ra,Dec not the same so looks like a bum hit !! :sad2: Unless I miss read it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Converted image to JPG(see attached) then using ASPS it solved (using your 50mm and 3.75um) in 74secs and gave this as the solved image and the dec/ra match Astrometry.net - result

clivesolve-1.jpg

clivesolve-1a.jpg

nan.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stash_old said:

Ran your image against Astronometry.net and Ra,Dec not the same so looks like a bum hit !!

On 13/04/2018 at 09:04, Demonperformer said:

AT has started not performing as required ... it has placed NAN in the middle of Gemini, with a field size about 1/8 of the actual image.

Interesting - your run has placed NAN slap bang where my version of AT (through Sharpcap) placed it - in the middle of Gemini with field of 2.5 x 2 degrees, instead of about 20x15 deg - that has got to be more than just a coincidence. And it suggests to me that the problem lies more with the image than with the setup.

As I mentioned above, the M42 pic in SC solved perfectly. Think the next step is to find a different image and see if I can solve that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stash_old said:

Converted image to JPG(see attached) then using ASPS it solved (using your 50mm and 3.75um) in 74secs and gave this as the solved image and the dec/ra match Astrometry.net - result

Hmm ... I will have to give that a try on my system. Back in a bit ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this looks a little more promising.

Using the complete set of 41xx index files, SC found 49 sources at 15:25:25.8 and solved it at 15:25:28.4 (2.6s). Checked the coordinates and they are right over NAN.

So I guess the problem lies in using a FITS file instead of a JPG file.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for fun, I ran it through with the selection of 42xx index files for this size field: 15:35:19.9 to 15:35:22.9 (3.0s - a whole 0.4s longer).

Next step, run some tests with some other subs. Now I know that the system does work and just how long it should take, I won't go waiting around for hours any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Demonperformer said:

Well, this looks a little more promising.

Using the complete set of 41xx index files, SC found 49 sources at 15:25:25.8 and solved it at 15:25:28.4 (2.6s). Checked the coordinates and they are right over NAN.

So I guess the problem lies in using a FITS file instead of a JPG file.

Maybe a case of "cant see the wood for the tree's" when using fits. Still could do with SC letting users change some more paramters - Downscaling as I have said does seem to make a difference. Only glad I dont use "Blind" solving very often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you use to convert that to jpg? I have tried several progs and they do not like it. In addition, when I try other images that do convert, they don't solve ...

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. That was the first one I tried yesterday, but it keeps returning "error during conversion process". Which, considering you got it to work, makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever. But then, why should this bit be any different??

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, before chasing too far down this rabbit hole, I have sent a pm to Robin to see if I am doing anything obviously stupid which can be easily solved to enable me to solve the fits files. That would eliminate the need for conversion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By ntaylorblanchard
      Note on this issue: A suggestion from another forum seems to have found the problem but I'm not sure. It was suggested that after 3 hours my power tank was drained enough to inhibit the operation of the cooler. I attached my second (smaller) power tank and it seems to be working now. Of course the camera sat for awhile before I was given the idea that power was the issue and decided to try a test with a new power source.  If anyone has any additional information or suggestion for me they would be appreciated.  Original issue is below:
       
      HELP PLEASE! ASI294 MC Pro Stopped cooling Also have an image saving issue. I'll try to give as much detail as I can:
      Using APT with an ASI294 MC Pro - CAMERA IS NEW
      Cooler is powered by a Celestron Powertank 17 fully charged connected using an Orion DC cable w/Auto Lighter Plug
      Connecting via ASCOM ASI Camera 1 setting
      Properties are
      Image Type RAW 16
      Bayer RGGB
      Unity Gain
      Gain 120
      Offset 30
      USB limit 40
      The camera is plugged directly into the laptop NOT a USB hub. I believe all my laptops USB ports are USB 2.0
      No other software (such as PHD2) was running.
      No other cameras attached.

      Trying to create a dark library.
      Cooling to -5C from room temp of around 25-30C
      Camera and cooler were working fine for a couple of hours but I then ran into a snag:
       
      I got a time-out message from APT saying "Still waiting image from the camera - 30s" also -
      The cooling stopped working. (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.)
      I'm also noticing that the laptop is making the chime noise it makes when something is unplugged or plugged in.
       
      I tried connecting to the camera just using APT's ZWO camera setting with the same results.
      Black level and USB speed settings were left blank.
       
      Disconnecting and reconnecting everything seems to fix the problem only for a minute then I'm right back into the same problem. Changing USB ports does not help.
       
      I tried using ZWO's "ASI Studio" and I did not seem to have any problems capturing images but the cooler didn't seem to be working. (Power was = 100%)
      I tried using Sharpcap and did not seem to be able to do anything but I'm very unfamiliar with that software.
       
      I went back to APT and tried doing 10 lights exposures of 30 sec each with no power to the cooler. Those went ok. I then connected the cooler. The cooler cooled the camera down to 23.2C then stopped.
      Cooling Aid settings are
      Target -5
      Step 5
      Pause 5
      Timeout 120 (also tried timeout 300)
      Disconnected the cooler and ran another set of 10 30 sec light subs. These went ok. Tried set of 10 10 sec darks without cooler. This also went ok.
      I tried reinstalling the ASCOM drivers from the ASI site, restarted the laptop, restarted APT. Camera cooled from around 30C to 25.3C then stopped cooling (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.) I again started hearing the plugged/unplugged chimes from the laptop.
      So right now this seems to be some issue with the cooling. Is the camera defective?
      While I'm not computer illiterate, I'm not highly technical. I'd appreciate any help or advice but please put it into simple straightforward terms.
    • By Dave Baxter
      Just wondering what other people have experienced with this camera.  I'm using a MacBook Pro, and want to use this camera with my Celestron 8SE.  Primarily interested in the planets and the moon, but some deep sky images would be great if it's up to it.  

      It seems to be out of stock every where, but at $249 is about what I can afford to spend (no income at the moment).  All of the research I've been able to do on this camera indicates it should work well with my set up.
      I'm just curious if you have had any issues or problems.  Thanks in advance!
    • By Ronan Hunt
      Hi All,
      Im looking for preloved zwo asi 183mm Pro or 1600mm Pro and a zwo 8x1.25 inch EFW. Let me know if you have anything suitable. 

      Many Thanks,
      Ronan 
    • By Michael Hogan
      Sony IMX294 4/3 CMOS Sensor Extremely low read noise - 1.2e @30db gain 14Bit ADC - provides real 14bit dynamic range Electronic shutter - no issues with vibrations sometimes found in mechanical shutters USB3.0 Port (back compatible with USB2.0) - 16fps@4144×2822 AR coated protective window - all light can pass Compatible with Windows / Mac OS / Linux LIKE NEW £750 FLO price with delivery is  £1,022.95 ill pay shipping getting ASI6200mc Pro why I'm selling camera is perfect.
      The camera will be shipped in box with all the extras
         
    • By KEJ
      Restoring a Backup on a Mac
       
      Something else I came across and a chap called Terry on Facebook had a solution.
      Again, you might already know this, but just in case.
       
       
      Backup
      You buy a new ASIAIR Pro, you are pretty much advised that one of the first things you should do, is to create a backup of your software(includes your license key) from the supplied SD card.
      And one of the common methods suggested for Mac users is to use the “Apple Pi Baker” program/application.
        
       
      So, I used the application to create my backup and saved it in a safe place, in fact I made two copies(belt and braces).
      Then, yesterday, I thought I should really try to restore one of these backups to make sure they actually work, else what is the point of having a backup for that rainy day.
      And actually, I will keep the original safe and use my copy going forward.
       
      Restore
      So, I inserted a new blank SD card(Fat32) and started the restore process, letting it run its course.
      Once it had finished, I did a quick eye ball to compare the copy to the original and all the files appeared to be there.
       
       
       
      I then plugged the restored SD card back into the ASIAIR Pro, but the device would not start/boot up!
      Just in case, I then reformatted another SD card and tried that one, but still no good.
      I then created another backup from the original SD card(so all in all I had img and zip versions) and tried to restore them, the same result, fail.
       
       On further investigation, it looks like this is fairly common.
       Terry on ASIAIR Facebook group suggested downloading the file from the ZWO website, but then using your own License file.
       
       
      I then used the ASIAIR PRO link above(from the “How_to_Restore_ASIAIR_OS.pdf” on line doc)  to get the file.
      First, keeping a copy of my zwoair_license safe of course(still on the original SD card).
      The file is pretty large, unzips to about 31 GB and takes a while to download(9GB zipped) even on cable.

       
      I then restored(using Apple Pi Baker) this new downloaded file to my new SD card and once it had completed, I then overwrote(replaced) the 
      existing “zwoair_license” file with my original(my unique supplied copy).
      Next, I then inserted the new copied/restored SD card into the ASIAIR Pro and it started.
      Finally, I then connected via the ASIAIR app using my IPhone and was prompted to update the firmware to the latest version which I did.
       
      Happy Ending
      Bingo all good, the original SD card supplied by ZWO stored in a safe place and I am now using this copy going forward.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.