Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep2_banner.thumb.jpg.e37c929f88100393e885b7befec4c749.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
Cosmic Geoff

Jupiter, Saturn, Mars - 26 March

Recommended Posts

Another planetary imaging session, this time with the C8 and the ASI120MC camera. This was the first time I tried to image these with the C8 so something of a 'test'.  The log shows that I spent 25 minutes of valuable time in taking the rig down after imaging Jupiter and setting it up in a different position to image the other two planets.  Next time I'll put it in a different position that will avoid having to move it.  The altitude of Jupiter was about 20 deg, and the other two at around a roof-skimming 10 deg.

Unsurprisingly (or otherwise) the results seem a bit better than with the 127mm Mak.  In particular, I could easily see the Great Red Spot in the laptop live view.  I feel a bit disappointed that Jupiter did not sharpen up more in processing.

Here are three of the processed images (processed in Registax6 and should be the noninverted & nonflipped view). Again, not the world's best, but...

I focused the camera on Spica. Mars has processed up quite sharp and, again, distinctly non-round (88% phase).  But any tips on focussing? there are some apps in Smartcap, or maybe I should get a Bahinov (sp?) mask.  I also recorded some .ser video which won't load into Registax for some reason- have to look into why.

Jupiter05_40_47.jpg

Mars06_15_04.jpg

Saturn06_10_27.jpg

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice set of images. How many frames did you actually stack? The results are a bit noisy, which suggests that stacking more might help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

Nice set of images. How many frames did you actually stack? The results are a bit noisy, which suggests that stacking more might help

The original videos each contain 500 frames.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cosmic Geoff said:

The original videos each contain 500 frames.

That might be a little short. I regularly get a few thousand frames on planets like Jupiter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as!2 (or 3) will take the ser files and probably give a better stack than r6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 nice images there, with some decent detail visible. Nice to see the GRS on display.

Autostakkert will certainly accept your SER files, I always stack this type of file. A/S will also save a sharpened image when stacking to give an idea of what detail is going to be visible when processed. More frames would certainly help when processing, around a 1,000 is generally what I end stacking from an imaging run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderful set, Geoff! What a planetary dance going on in the pre-dawn sky!

Reggie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cosmic Geoff
      I imaged Jupiter, Saturn and Mars this morning around 3.30am in the interval between 'high enough' and dawn.  Equipment: CPC800, ASI224MC, ADC. Captured with Sharpcap, processed with Registax6. Used best 20% of 5000 frame videos.
      It's so long since I did any planetary imaging that I had to re-learn what to do. The Jupiter and Saturn images seem under-exposed.



    • By javaruba
      Hi folks,
      I've been seeing tear drop shape stars with the EdgeHd 8 and ZWO ASI294MC Pro camera, so I verified the collimation. I'm using a celestron x0.7 reducer.
      Does collimation needs to be checked  with an eyepiece or with the camera and with or without reducer? I'm asking since I verified my collimation yesterday and couldn't see the concentric rings with the complete imaging train (ASI294MC, OAG, and x0.7 reducer). It was only showing the inner shadow and outer circle. I than  replaced the AS294MC with my guide cam (ASI120) which has a much smaller sensor and could see many rings. While, to my view, it seems to be collimated, it's strange that I can't see the rings with the main imaging cam. Any thoughts? Here's how I left the collimation after some adjustments with the guide cam.

      Kind regards,
      Jairo
    • By Victor Boesen
      Yesterday I managed to climb out of bed at a little past 3:30AM to get my small portable rig out to a small nearby park and setup to observe Jupiter, Saturn and Mars. I got the Skywatcher Evostar 72ED DS-Pro last summer so I was especially excited to see how it would perform on Mars because of its red wavelengths which many small fracs often have trouble with handling.
      At first it was partly cloudy but I persisted and was out and setup on the field at around 4AM. The sky was already surprisingly bright here in Denmark but Jupiter was shining bright and Saturn faintly visible almost right besides Jupiter. Fortunately for me it wasn't too cold, but I was happy I brought some gloves anyways;)

      This picture was taken at 5AM while I was observing Mars.
      I remember from last year that my scope didn't perform great on Jupiter for some reason, and the view of the gas giant wasn't anything different this time either. Using my 4.7mm ES 82 degree eyepiece not much detail visible except the two main bands and its moons. I would later return to Jupiter after the scope had cooled down a little and the view was perhaps a little sharper.
      Pointing the scope at Saturn, which I was very satisfied with last year, I was amazed of the detail the small scope managed to squeeze out. It doesn't compare to the view I had last year with my 10" dob under great conditions at 255X but I was able to easily spot surface banding on the planet itself, and the Cassini division was also surprisingly stable. I really enjoy the stable and consistent view through the small refractor! I observed Saturn for quite a while until I eventually set out to try to find Mars. At this point I couldn't even see Saturn with the naked eye but I was fortunate that Saturn and Mars were approximately the same elevation above the horizon.
      After a few sweeps across where I though Mars would be I finally located the small red speckle, this time with my 6.7mm eyepiece so I had a larger FOV. Switching to the 4.7mm, though still very small, I was surprised that I could pick up a dark surface marking across the disk on the lower southern half of the disk. Furthermore, the southern polar cap was really pronounced and you couldn't miss it. I watched Mars drift through the FOV until about 30 minutes after sunrise where the contrast between the planet and the sky became too low and the dew started to set on the lens element.
      Using my small refractor for observing the planets I have always wanted to magnify things a little bit more, and I think the telescope would have no problem doing so. A Nagler zoom 3-6mm has been on my wish-list for a couple of years now, but the upcoming planet season really makes me want to find one second hand
      Here's a video I've made that covers what I've written above with some footage I tried capturing through the eyepiece:
      I hope everyone on here is still doing well despite the current situation!
      Clear skies!
      Victor
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.