Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_2019_sp_banner.thumb.jpg.a0ff260c05b90dead5c594e9b4ee9fd0.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hello..

First of all would like to say thank you to everyone who has helped me narrow down and help me decide what scope I should get has been a long month trying to decide :) 

The scope I’ve decided to go for is the AZ Pronto and 130p as it’s the best one I can afford which suite my needs..( could’ve gone bigger but had to lower my budget :( ) 

im going to mainly be using this scope for hunting faint fuzzies ( Clusters and Galaxies). My skies are reasonably good, I don’t suffer badly from light pollution. As I have not used a proper telescope before as I have mentioned I wanted to know what is possible with this scope as I don’t want to set my expectations too high ( not expecting Hubble images). Would I be able to make out some of the ngc galaxies near Triangulum for example? Even if they appear to small and faint? Even if they don’t have any detail I just find it fascinating that we can see objects that are so far away.Would also hope you could give me some targets for me that I should look for when I get it which will hopefully be very soon :)  I have turn left at Orion which I’ll have another read through but wanted some of you to tell me your experiences if you’ve had the 130p

again thanks for all the help in the previous posts and of course in this.

Edited by Dinoco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on just how dark your skies are you should be able to see plenty.  I don't have a 130p, but from what I read it is a 5" aperture. That will be plenty to make out many of the deep sky objects you'd like to see.  As you mentioned already, some may not show much detail and may just be faint fuzzies, but you'll be able to find them and know what you are looking at.

 

Keep in mind that the magnification depends entirely on what eyepiece(s) you are using, and these can be upgraded at any time.  You certainly don't need high magnification to find many objects, and high magnification can often be detrimental as it restricts the amount of light that makes it to your eye.

 

Might I suggest you have a look at Bode's Galaxies (M81 and M82).  These can easily be seen through binoculars when sky conditions are right, and I bet you can get quite a stunning view with your new scope.  That should give you a decent idea of just how things will look.  Also, if you are out in the morning take a look at M13, that should bring a smile to your face!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hayduke27 said:

Keep in mind that the magnification depends entirely on what eyepiece(s) you are using, and these can be upgraded at any time.  You certainly don't need high magnification to find many objects, and high magnification can often be detrimental as it restricts the amount of light that makes it to your eye.

 

Might I suggest you have a look at Bode's Galaxies (M81 and M82).  These can easily be seen through binoculars when sky conditions are right, and I bet you can get quite a stunning view with your new scope.  That should give you a decent idea of just how things will look.  Also, if you are out in the morning take a look at M13, that should bring a smile to your face!

Thanks, won’t be upgrading the eyepieces for a while until I get used to the scope. I’ve been using this http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/astronomy-field-view-calculator and using the search option with the eyepiece still not sure how accurate this is, probably not that accurate. I’ll keep a note on those targets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a thread with the same title as yours Dinoco in this set of listings.  Here is the link

Even if you don't plough through the entire set of postings its worth a glance down the first page, even if you only clock the pictures.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, JOC said:

There is a thread with the same title as yours Dinoco in this set of listings.  Here is the link

Even if you don't plough through the entire set of postings its worth a glance down the first page, even if you only clock the pictures.

Thanks for that. In the back of my mind it I knew it  would look similar to that is a very useful thread. I keep trying to tell my self that everything will not look like the images :) I dont really care that they don’t as long as I can make out what it is And then especially looking afterwards what you’ve seen and realise how far away it   is think it’s even more exciting then not having those clear images ( may sound strange) also why I learnt about the science side of it first to get a better appreciation for it all.

maybe I should change the title..

Edited by Dinoco
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW my telescope is the bit bigger brother to yours - my view of Jupiter and Saturn are both similar to the telescope pictures in that thread as are my views of things M42 - I think you will be in the ball park of views that are similar - the magnification that you use will make a huge difference.  The moon will blow you away!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dinoco said:

Would I be able to make out some of the ngc galaxies near Triangulum

I would say these are unlikely as they are around Mag 13 or 14 and need dark skies and a biggish dob to see. I think I saw down to about mag 14.5 with my 16" at a dark site.

You might get NGC604 which is a bright Nebula within M33. I would start with some of the others such as M81/82, still around 12 million ly away! The Leo Triplet should also be quite doable under dark skies, up to 42 million ly distant, pretty amazing still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jupiter, when well positioned can be amazing. This was taken with a 4" Tak, using an iPhone handheld at the eyepiece. The actual views were much sharper. Bear in mind that the Tak is a cracking scope, sharper and better contrast, but you should still see good detail, multiple belts, shadow transits and GRS with a 130 Newt.

IMG_2951.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dinoco. :hello:

I have the 130P. Great little scope. I liked it so much I've just bought the 130P-DS also.
To give you a realistic idea what you can expect to see, below are some photos I've taken using the 130P.
They are unprocessed - haven't quite figured that out yet - and also unguided. (again, still figuring PHD2 out also) 

Andromeda.
5a904a2d0c41e_IMG_0024(2).thumb.JPG.6dbc5c7d8b9a80c7ec9dbdc327747dcd.JPG

Pleiades
5a904a2f93a6b_IMG_0039(2).thumb.JPG.93cc14d75218f26addda73c85091de09.JPG

Orion Nebula.
5a904a32478dc_IMG_0070(2).thumb.JPG.e83ebc1635ab68c7703753d439460c0d.JPG

I assume you know what this is.. :)
5a904a350919c_IMG_5574(2).thumb.JPG.d00c74ab05c5283b3494d60be13ce1d6.JPG

Like I said above, great little scope. 

Hope this helps. 
Pete.

Edited by Redscouse
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice pics Pete. To be clear though, M42 won't show colour as shown in your image. At best you might see a faint greenish tint to the Nebula. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Stu said:

I would say these are unlikely as they are around Mag 13 or 14 and need dark skies and a biggish dob to see. I think I saw down to about mag 14.5 with my 16" at a dark site.

You might get NGC604 which is a bright Nebula within M33. I would start with some of the others such as M81/82, still around 12 million ly away! The Leo Triplet should also be quite doable under dark skies, up to 42 million ly distant, pretty amazing still.

The Leo triplet is on the top of my list for galaxies one of my favourite hoping i  can get a good view of them. andromeda is close second can sort of make it out with binos but would like to see it through the scope. Thanks for the recommendations :) 

 

Edited by Dinoco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Stu said:

To be clear though, M42 won't show colour as shown in your image.

Oh yes. Never thought of that. Perhaps I should have said "this is what your camera will see". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stu said:

Jupiter, when well positioned can be amazing. This was taken with a 4" Tak, using an iPhone handheld at the eyepiece. The actual views were much sharper. Bear in mind that the Tak is a cracking scope, sharper and better contrast, but you should still see good detail, multiple belts, shadow transits and GRS with a 130 Newt.

IMG_2951.JPG

Great image considering it’s with a iPhone. Unfortunately the planets are quite low at the moment I think will be hard to and have trees opposite my garden so will have to wait till they get higher looking forward to it though and also I think mars is supposed to be the closest it’s been to us in a long time I think this year so will want to have a look for that ( even though it might be an orange pea)

Edited by Dinoco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Redscouse said:

Hi Dinoco. :hello:

I have the 130P. Great little scope. I liked it so much I've just bought the 130P-DS also.
To give you a realistic idea what you can expect to see, below are some photos I've taken using the 130P.
They are unprocessed - haven't quite figured that out yet - and also unguided. (again, still figuring PHD2 out also) 

Andromeda.
5a904a2d0c41e_IMG_0024(2).thumb.JPG.6dbc5c7d8b9a80c7ec9dbdc327747dcd.JPG

Pleiades
5a904a2f93a6b_IMG_0039(2).thumb.JPG.93cc14d75218f26addda73c85091de09.JPG

Orion Nebula.
5a904a32478dc_IMG_0070(2).thumb.JPG.e83ebc1635ab68c7703753d439460c0d.JPG

I assume you know what this is.. :)
5a904a350919c_IMG_5574(2).thumb.JPG.d00c74ab05c5283b3494d60be13ce1d6.JPG

Like I said above, great little scope. 

Hope this helps. 
Pete.

Nice pictures. :) 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Dinoco said:

Great image considering it’s with a iPhone. Unfortunately the planets are quite low at the moment I think will be hard to and have trees opposite my garden so will have to wait till they get higher looking forward to it though and also I think mars is supposed to be the closest it’s been to us in a long time I think this year so will want to have a look for that ( even though it might be an orange pee) 

Yes, planets are low for a good few years yet so best to try to get somewhere with a low horizon, not looking over houses. Even though Mars is close later in the year, it is will still only be around 13 degrees above the horizon so views won't be brilliant.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Stu said:

Yes, planets are low for a good few years yet so best to try to get somewhere with a low horizon, not looking over houses. Even though Mars is close later in the year, it is will still only be around 13 degrees above the horizon so views won't be brilliant.

Are you able to make out M103? Also one of my favourites just because of the name :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Dinoco said:

Are you able to make out M103? Also one of my favourites just because of the name :) 

Yep M103 is a nice Open Cluster. As NGC457 to your list, the Owl or ET Cluster, great fun. Not far from 103 and a bit brighter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Stu said:

Yep M103 is a nice Open Cluster. As NGC457 to your list, the Owl or ET Cluster, great fun. Not far from 103 and a bit brighter

Thanks. Ordering it tonight from FLO so should have it next week can’t wait :). weather doesn’t look good though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Dinoco said:

Thanks. Ordering it tonight from FLO so should have it next week can’t wait :). weather doesn’t look good though.

In my (short) experience, whenever you buy something astro related, expect clouds, lots of them. :clouds1::clouds1::clouds2:

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Redscouse said:

In my (short) experience, whenever you buy something astro related, expect clouds, lots of them. :clouds1::clouds1::clouds2:

Yep. Been having a few clear nights recently I’m sure that will all change when i get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stu said:

Yes, planets are low for a good few years yet

Can you define 'good'? 5, 10?
Where can I find this stuff out please if you don't mind pointing me in the right direction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Redscouse said:

Can you define 'good'? 5, 10?
Where can I find this stuff out please if you don't mind pointing me in the right direction. 

Good point :) 

This post has info about Saturn and Mars, will dig something up about Jupiter.

https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/269919-planets-disappearing/?do=findComment&comment=2954210

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just put this together from SkySafari, should be right. So, a good few years is probably 5 or so, 6 until back to best.

Jupiter Oppositions

2018 May 9th 22.6 degrees

2019 June 10th 16.2 degrees

2020 July 14th 16.8 degrees

2021 Aug 20th 25.1 degrees

2022 Sept 26th 38.7 degrees

2023 Nov 3rd 52.2 degrees

2024 Dec 7th 60.7 degrees

2025 Jan 10th 60.8 degrees

2026 Feb 11th 53.8 degrees

2027 Mar 12th 42.9 degrees

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stu, that is exactly the kind of info I was looking for. 
Might have to follow Peter's example in the thread and visit Tenerife for a week or three! :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Joaquim Q
      Hi, i..m on Stargazers Lounge for long time ago, but now i have a new scope at last!!! The scope is a Skywatcher classic200p dobsonian, and i received it just one month ago. I.m really happy with it. For now, i.m using the stock eyepieces that come with the scope, a 25mm and 10mm super plossl 52. Yesterday i was received a Celestron Omni barlow, and that expands my magnification range. I posted some pics with my set. 
      Congratulations to Stargazers lounge team, this is one of the best sites to learn about astronomy and equipment. 
      Besf regards to everybody 




    • By Per_jensen
      This one didnt quite go as planned, i think i might have tried to overcorrect for alot of things during post processing, but i might as well share it with you guys anyways. Then again, perhaps i've just stared too much at it during processing.. Anyways, i hope you like it
      m81 & m82 LRGB
      L 74 frames of 180s = 222 min
      R 41 frames of 180s = 123 min
      G 40 frames of 180s = 120 min
      B 38 frames of 180s = 114 min
      Total int. 9,6 hours
      8" Reflecltor telescope
      ZWO ASI 1600mm camera
      Eq6-R Pro mount
      L  74 frames of 180s = 222 min
      R  41 frames of 180s = 123 min
      G  40 frames of 180s = 120 min
      B  38 frames of 180s = 114 min
      Total int. 9,6 hours

    • By floastro
      Hi guys,
      This is the first lights of my ASA 12"N f/3.62 (purchased in 2007) with my Moravian G4-16000 CCD camera using one KAF-16803 chip of 36mm x 36mm (4K x 4K).
      The adjustments, collimation, ASA OK3-Z pression screws, asked a lot of attention.
      For a precise collimation, i use the CATSEYE XL & XLKP kit.
      This is the first 3hrs of exposures taken the last weekend in one night. The second night was too windy unfortunately.
       

       
      Full Resolution image in 4K x 4K here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/integration_NGC4438_DBE_3HDR_CompositeAplatie2_Spikes2-Modifier-Modifier-Modifier.jpg
       
      Full Resolution Annotated image here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/NGC4438_new_image_Annotated.jpg
       
       
      All the information below :
       

       

       
       

       
      Enjoy !
      Florent ?
    • By Kronos831
      So,after observing in my backyard for a month + (visible targets only in orion taurus auriga and monocerus) , i ve decided to start observing from my front yard.Now ,i see a whole new sky Ursa Major Leo, Virgo and more.A week ago , was the first time i saw a galaxy.To be exact,m81,m82 and m64.I cannot describe what i felt when i took a look throught the eyepiece,i was amazed.Even though they were just faint fuzzies with no detail whatsoever,it was magestic. Then, i tried to observe m51 and m101,with no results.I ve read reports that m51 is a quite bright and obvious galaxy .If so,why cant i see it? Also,can anybody give me advice as to what to observe in and near ursa major?I ve made my own star charts for M81 M82 and M64 and now need more to further advance my Views of the messier objects.Thanks
      Kronos
    • By Mezz
      Hi,
      I am going to buy my first telescope and I can't make up my mind with the focal ratio. I have seen this two option within my budget
      Skywatcher 130/1000 eq2 with a f/7.7 ratio
      Meade 130 Polaris EQ with 650 mm focal length and f/5 ratio.
      I read that a f/7.7 would be better to watch planets while f/5 would be better to watch galaxies and nebulae and will also give a brighter image.
       
      As I am new and never looked through a telescope like those I don't know which to choose. The idea of looking at galaxies really excited me but I also wanted to see planets such as Jupiter or Saturn and it's moons, and at the moment I am not considering photography as I still need to get familiar with the telescope but in the future I would love to take some photos so brightness could be important.
      My question is how much difference would I noticed between these two focal ratio when I looked at planets and galaxies. Would I get a much better view of Saturn with a f/7.7 or not really?
      Thanks in advance for your advices
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.