Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters.thumb.jpg.b518052b915c2cf31f5f12e33ce0e9d2.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
Ronclarke

NGC 2238 The Rosette Nebula

Recommended Posts

Clear sky (some LP) but for some reason I forgot to balance the rig so guiding was hard work!!

30 Lights 10 Darks

Stacked and processed in DSS and CS3

 

NGC2238-Rosette-nebulasmall.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your stars look good even though guiding was tough.  IUs this a OSC image? 

Rodd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what an OSC image is Rodd? This is a reduced jpeg from CS3..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ronclarke said:

Not sure what an OSC image is Rodd? This is a reduced jpeg from CS3..

One Shot Colour (as opposed to using a mono camera with RGB filters).

It's the start of a nice rosette. I'd recommend taking flats to remove the vignette. This is causing the central part of the image to have a heavy gradient. Flats work best but if you can't take them then you can remove much of the gradient in processing using GradientXterminator in Photoshop or DynamicBackgroundExtractor in PixInsight, for example.

Here's a quick adjustment to remove as much of the gradient as I could:

NGC2238-Rosette-nebulasmall.thumb.jpg.c70253551e8df6599befc18a2ed5f1aa.jpg

What were the length of the subs you took and what scope and camera did you use?

You have a very solid red cast to the image which may be light pollution. Again, if you take flats then any residual gradients such as LP or moonlight are more easily removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ken, it was taken with a modded DSLR (1000d) and I do have a bit of light pollution, mostly to the North of me!

Subs were 120 and 180 secs using a SW ED80 Pro on an HEQ5.

I'll try adding some Flats during the week and a bit more processing, thanks for your input Ken..

 

Thanks

Ron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick reprocess with more saturation and contrast, what do you think??

 

NGC2238saturated-small.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.