Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if any of you have used Vixen PL eyepieces before? When I buy my new scope ( either a 130p/150p dob) I was looking to purchase some of these eyepieces to use instead of the stock ones as people tend to say they aren’t great at best. The eyepieces looking to get are the 25mm ones and 10mm. Is there a big difference using these then using the stock ones. Or if not the vixen eyepieces any alternatives that are in that price range. Or is it worth just keeping the stock EPs for a while. Just want to get the best possible views from the get go.

Many Thanks

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you mean Vixen NPL Plossls, then yes, I would say they are definitely a step up from kit eyepieces. They are well regarded Plossls with the general consensus being that they are bright and crisp with very little edge distortion. The only issue I see is a little astigmatism (I think) right next to the field stop in the 30mm NPL in my 120ED, but I have to look for it, it doesn't bother me otherwise.

The only common criticism is the twist up eyecup. I can feel a bit plastic, especially when extended, but personally I use mine without extending it as it makes the eye relief too tight to see the field stop.

FYI - best price I can find currently is at Tring Astronomy, £37 each :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, parallaxerr said:

If you mean Vixen NPL Plossls, then yes, I would say they are definitely a step up from kit eyepieces. They are well regarded Plossls with the general consensus being that they are bright and crisp with very little edge distortion. The only issue I see is a little astigmatism (I think) right next to the field stop in the 30mm NPL in my 120ED, but I have to look for it, it doesn't bother me otherwise.

The only common criticism is the twist up eyecup. I can feel a bit plastic, especially when extended, but personally I use mine without extending it as it makes the eye relief too tight to see the field stop.

FYI - best price I can find currently is at Tring Astronomy, £37 each :)

Great thanks, was going to get them off flo when I order my scope an everything else which they sell them   for £41. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/vixen-eyepieces/Vixen_NPL-4.html

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth ringing FLO if you are getting your scope from them as they may well do some sort of deal, perhaps ask if you can swap the stock EPs for a better price as you don't really need them. Just a thought and worst case they will probably price match the EP's. 

Steve

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the Vixen NPL are great quality EP's. Very sharp views right to the edge and very contrasty (make hunting down galaxies very easy). As mentioned above.........many people who try them all say the same thing: "very short eye relief". I dont find this an issue. 

The twist up eye cup does feel a bit plastic and cheap. I never have them twisted up, so not an issue with me.

I LOVE my NPL's. I have: 8,15 and 30mm.

I also have a 25mm Vixen SLV (much more expensive than the NPL's) and to be honest, i dont find it as good.

John (the SGL eyepiece guru) has compared all sorts of eyepieces with each other and i believe his conclusion about the NPL when compared to a VERY popular brand (BST) is that they are very similar. Not much difference in the price of both, but the BST offer longer eye relief.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces.html

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/vixen-eyepieces/vixen-npl-eyepieces.html

The NPL have a field of view (FOV) of 50 degrees. The BST have a FOV of 60 degrees.

Edited by LukeSkywatcher
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/9/2018 at 23:25, LukeSkywatcher said:

In other words:

For the sake of a few pound more.........i'd go for the BST. You get a wider FOV and better eye relief.

Sorry to bring up an old thread have just seen your reply my apologies. I’ve decided to go for this scope https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-az5-deluxe/sky-watcher-explorer-130ps-az5-deluxe.html and reading more would prefer a wider FOV .when I order it  I was going to get maybe a 8 and 15  (and probably stick with the 25mm stock one for a while) eps from this set https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces/bst-starguider-60-8mm-ed-eyepiece.html would these be a good choice think they’re the ones you were talking about?

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Dinoco said:

Sorry to bring up an old thread have just seen your reply my apologies. I’ve decided to go for this scope https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-az5-deluxe/sky-watcher-explorer-130ps-az5-deluxe.html and reading more would prefer a wider FOV .when I order it  I was going to get maybe a 8 and 15  (and probably stick with the 25mm stock one for a while) eps from this set https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces/bst-starguider-60-8mm-ed-eyepiece.html would these be a good choice think they’re the ones you were talking about?

The 130ps is 650mm

BSTs are good EPs and come in 3.2, 5,8,12,15,18 &25. You will be okay with them.

The 130 should be okay up to x175 magnification

if you divide the 650 by the eyepiece size then you get the magnification for that Eyepiece in that scope.

650/25= x26

650/18=x36

650/15=x43

650/12=x54

650/8=x81

650/5=x130

if you try to get spreads of x40 then you get good value at the eyepiece

so, x26 then x54 then x81 then x130

which is 25mm then 12mm then 8mm then 5mm

if you keep the supplied 25mm (for low power) then I would get the 5mm for high power and the 12mm for mid power. You could add the 8mm later... or get the 8mm instead of the 12mm and then the 12mm later?

Check the second hand pages then maybe you can get 3 for price of 2!

Alan

Edited by alanjgreen
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, alanjgreen said:

The 130ps is 650mm

BSTs are good EPs and come in 3.2, 5,8,12,15,18 &25. You will be okay with them.

The 130 should be okay up to x175 magnification

if you divide the 650 by the eyepiece size then you get the magnification for that Eyepiece in that scope.

650/25= x26

650/18=x36

650/15=x43

650/12=x54

650/8=x81

650/5=x130

if you try to get spreads of x40 then you get good value at the eyepiece

so, x26 then x54 then x81 then x130

which is 25mm then 12mm then 8mm then 5mm

if you the supplied 25mm then I would get the 5mm for high power and the 12mm for mid power. You could add the 8mm later...

Alan

Thank you Alan for that helpful info, I knew there was a rule but forgot what it was :) just want something better then the stock eps and not overkill at the same time. FLO are doing a good discount on the BST eps if you order two or more. Not sure how long it will last though have to wait a couple of months before I can order.

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Ricochet said:

I would suggest saving up for a 24mm ES68° over the 25mm Starguider, which is the odd one out in the range and does not cope with fast scopes as well as the rest.

Those are quite expensive bit out my budget if your talking about these https://www.firstlightoptics.com/explore-scientific-eyepieces/explore-scientific-68-degree-series-eyepieces.html

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Ricochet said:

Yes, those are the ones. I have to admit I had forgotten the scale of the price increase, they used to be £100. It would still be worth watching out for a second hand one though I feel.

Thanks I’ll keep it in mind, would the 130p benefit from any type of filters ? Was thinking of this https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/explore-scientific-uhc-nebula-filter-1-25-2-inch.html

Edited by Dinoco
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dinoco said:

Thanks I’ll keep it in mind, would the 130p benefit from any type of filters? Going to mainly be using it on nebulae/ clusters and galaxy’s if I can get good views 

The right filters can be used with any size telescope. For nebulae you want UHC and OIII filters. These are the only filters you might ever need. Galaxies really need dark skies, while clusters are the least affected by light pollution and your best filter will be to increase the magnification. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By DeepSkyMan
      Hi everyone, not sure if this is the correct forum for this thread but thought it was close enough to topic 🙂  
      In prep for my Pulsar Obsy build a couple of months from now I’m looking to get ahead of software requirements for the dome.  Can anybody provide advice on a decent ‘Skinny’ software stack for mount and dome control.  Observing has been simple for me thus far, only need to worry about mount control.  However,  I got to thinking about how clumsy and inefficient things would be if goto commands were two separate unrelated actions one for mount control from my chosen planetarium software SkySafari, and then having to reach over and key in the Azimuth setting for dome position.   As far as I know there is no dome control interface from SkySafari, so it looks like this will be achieved via an RDP session into my Intel NUC and thence to the dome controller.   No big deal I guess this will just join my Atik Horizon control Software.  What is my best solution for joint mount and dome control?
      Kind Regards
      Paul.
    • By JemC
      Hi all,
      As i am soon to be the proud owner of a Vixen Polarie star tracker i am looking for some advice from the experts here on SGL with regards to widefield imaging with the Vixen Polarie.
      I will initially be using it with a modified Canon 600D so am looking for advice on which lens would be best suited to use with it, I have already been pointed in the direction of the Samyang 135mm which by all accounts is a pretty good contender, so aside from that particular lens what other/s would you recommend that are Canon fitting,
      Thanks in advance 🙂
    • By DeepSkyMan
      Guys
       
      just wondering what options are available for me to upgrade the standard SXW Vixen clamp to enable it to accept Losmandy style dovetails.  I recently acquired a CGE dovetail that I would like to use with my 8” Edge.
       
      Kind Regards
      Paul
       
    • By DeepSkyMan
      Hi there everybody, hope you are all keeping sane during COVID.  As already revealed in an earlier thread I will be building an observatory this year.  Whilst it’s a bit early for the exterior elements of the build, I’m keeping busy putting together all the accessories I will need from an interior perspective.  In doing so I’ve discovered a couple of thorny issues.
      1/.  I will need a 2.1mm power lead from Vixen to connect up to my new Pegasus UPB2; oh and just saying, what a fantastic piece of kit it is too.  If needs be I can always buy in the whoppingly over-priced AC/DC adapter from Vixen, however I really would like to power everything from a central core, rather than adding to the electrical spaghetti with independent power units.
      2/.  There is also an issue with my Atik Horizon.  Due to the fact that my little SXW is already stressed to the max, I can’t go with the preferred format of mounting the UPB2 on the mount or OTA, instead I will have to locate it as high up the pier as I can, which means that the power cable needs to be longer.  In addition, I will need to source a power lead from somewhere that will interface to the UPB2 and the Atik.  Had a look on the Atik website and there don’t seem to be any options in this regard.
      So I’m hoping that someone has had to deal with similar issues in the past and will be able to offer some much needed advice.😀
       
      Kind Regards
      Paul.
       
       
    • By jcj380
      Wondering what a realistic load capy. is for a Vixen APZ.  My biggest scope is an ST120 refractor that weighs about 5.5 kg with 8x50 finder and eyepiece.  I'm thinking of upgrading to a Crayford focuser which I believe will add another half kilo or so.
      I currently have a Twilight 1 which seems maxed out with the 120 and a SkyWatcher AZ5 which handles it a bit better, but it's also close to max load, I think.
      I have a Manfrotto 475B and a stock TW1 tripod.  I'd prefer not to use a counterweight, but if it's a necessity, so be it.
      Thanks!
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.