Jump to content

stargazine_ep44_banner.thumb.jpg.6153c4d39ed5a64b7d8af2d3d6061f61.jpg

5.5mm Bresser 'Plossl' Disassembly


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Lol I like to take a few merguez saussages which I cut in slices then cooked this in a pan. Then I add the Heinz tomato beans with some extra tomato ketchup, parsley and a bit of pepper. I e

It looks a bit like a Kellner II or a Bertele, but it's neither, and it is totally unlike a Plössl. Super marketing though. Interesting post! For anyone who doesn't have it yet: Lord-Eyepiec

+   +  = 5

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Alan White said:

Makes you appreciate how small the glass is in such an eyepiece.

The image showing the lenses next to the aluminium section is very clearly showing as a scale.

It's only the size of a regular Plossl, so it's a fairly small eyepiece anyway. I originally bought it for my ST80, a few people told me that as an Astroplanokular it wouldn't be too good on an f/5 scope, but it's actually quite good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a mathematician or an eyepiece manufacturer but it definitely states that there are five lenses in three groups.

https://www.telescopehouse.com/eyepieces/bresser-eyepieces/bresser-60-plossls/bresser-pl-5-5mm-60-31-7mm-1-25-inch.html

5a7b50351a427_Screenshot2018-02-07at19_13_33.png.698cd46d4a108aca42e27cb44079c389.png

The first two lenses look like single convex lenses to me. As there are two of them and there are five lenses in total it would be logical to assume that the last group was a cemented triplet. But, as I stated earlier, I'm not a mathematician or an eyepiece manufacturer.

Question: How many beans make five? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mak the Night said:

I'm fairly convinced the first two are single convex lenses, so I assumed the last group is a triplet. The whole range is supposedly five element.

I'd propose a simple method which might eliminate the guess work: Shine a flashlight through each of the lens(es), if you see two reflection spots, it's a singlet, three spots= doublet, four spots=tirplet.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, YKSE said:

I'd propose a simple method which might eliminate the guess work: Shine a flashlight through each of the lens(es), if you see two reflection spots, it's a singlet, three spots= doublet, four spots=tirplet.

I tried this with a white light and a red light torch. I saw a lot of spots on all of them & eventually spots before the eyes. I must be doing it wrong. Funny, because I was full of beans this morning. 

IMG_20180207_221543.jpg.66761fbc6e4779e5d4352e82ebd0fec4.jpg

Although, on closer examination, I can quite plainly see a line that appears half way in the first, larger part of the bisected outer surface of the group. Which could very well be two cemented lenses also cemented to the third convex lens at the bottom of the group. So, I reckon five beans make five beans. Of course, feel free to purchase one of these and investigate it yourself. It'll cost you 43 beans though lol.

Edited by Mak the Night
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol

I like to take a few merguez saussages which I cut in slices then cooked this in a pan. Then I add the Heinz tomato beans with some extra tomato ketchup, parsley and a bit of pepper.

I eat that with bread and cheese :p It's very good comfort food. Obviously this meal will cause serious gas problems the day after.

==================

LOL for the Beanz + beanz + Beanz :lol: heheh good one.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, N3ptune said:

Lol

I like to take a few merguez saussages which I cut in slices then cooked this in a pan. Then I add the Heinz tomato beans with some extra tomato ketchup, parsley and a bit of pepper.

I eat that with bread and cheese :p It's very good comfort food. Obviously this meal will cause serious gas problems the day after.

==================

LOL for the Beanz + beanz + Beanz :lol: heheh good one.

 

 

Sounds like great comfort food! But, yeah, expect flatulence lol. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ruud said:

It looks a bit like a Kellner II or a Bertele, but it's neither, and it is totally unlike a Plössl. Super marketing though.

Interesting post!

For anyone who doesn't have it yet: Lord-Eyepiece-Evolution-Tree.PDF

I think the term 'Plossl' has been overused by marketing. I suppose I can see why Bresser decided to describe this as an advanced Plossl design as it does physically resemble a small Plossl. 

5a7cbb60c570c_Screenshot2018-02-08at20_52_17.thumb.png.802edfbe0de973d299794f59ae61500b.png

Thanks for the PDF it looks interesting. I really expected this eyepiece to be an Astroplanokular or some form of Erfle, it seems to be an original design though. I use it in short tube achromats when I want a bit of magnification for certain DSO's. As it isn't used a lot I like the fact that it's small and easily carried in my bag. It's also well made, almost certainly JOC glass and with a smooth chromed brass drawtube. It feels like a quality EP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering why you'd show that particular part of the tree (and distracted by the Televue Wide Field) but now I see there is a Mod. Bertele in the view as well. The Bertele that I thought was similar to the Bresser is elsewhere on the chart, among the Kellner derivatives. Here:

5a7cc5635bb7b_KellnerIIBertele.png.c31105a293d4380c1e8179354d06212e.png

Like some others, I see two singlets and a doublet.

On the chart, btw, the number ε denotes the eye relief. If ε is 0.87 the eye relief is 0.87 times the focal length. Theta is the field of view , the position of the field stop is shown, and to the right in each diagram a small segment indicates the exit pupil.

I have a Televue Wide Field. It's a very crisp eyepiece but it has enormous pincushion distortion. Anything round has to stay in the centre because at the edge everything stretches out ridiculously. TV didn't sell it very long. It was replaced by the Panoptic.

For people who take an interest in Lord there is also this:  http://www.brayebrookobservatory.org/BrayObsWebSite/BOOKS/EVOLUTIONofEYEPIECES.pdf 

Edited by Ruud
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are similarities with the 15mm GSO SuperView, which I suspected of being a Bertele as it has four elements in three groups.

Similar to the Bresser there seems to be a 1-1-2 configuration.

15gso.jpg.f943fa4f98715883789a7cf211a14362.jpg

Above are the two singlets and doublet of the 15mm SuperView. Another eyepiece I can happily use in an f/5 refractor. 

IMG_20180207_221543.jpg.0c636c6c0022d2d3e44eb9bb117ce3b3.jpg

Above is the field lens of the 5.5mm Bresser. The convex part faces out of the eyepiece. I'm convinced this is a triplet, although there are those here who refute it, which is interesting as they don't provide any proof of their own to show otherwise. Possibly a classic case of CAIS (Cranial Anal Interface Syndrome). The group has an obvious division towards the convex field end, but the inwards facing side, which is flat , shows evidence of a further lens division making three in all. Neither of my degrees are in mathematics but I would assume that makes the final element a cemented triplet. I've examined the other two lenses as closely as I can and there's no visible indication that they aren't single lenses.  I wonder if this idea of 1-1 single convex lenses followed by a doublet or triplet is some sort of newer eyepiece evolution. And, if so, how many modern eyepieces actually employ this configuration?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2018-02-07 at 23:32, Mak the Night said:

I tried this with a white light and a red light torch. I saw a lot of spots on all of them & eventually spots before the eyes. I must be doing it wrong. Funny, because I was full of beans this morning. 

IMG_20180207_221543.jpg.66761fbc6e4779e5d4352e82ebd0fec4.jpg

Maybe I didn't use the words correctly. When typing "shine through", I was thinking of looking through an eyepiece, the right word here might should be shine at the lens(es), and look at the lens(es). Not shine nor look at side of a lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, YKSE said:

Maybe I didn't use the words correctly. When typing "shine through", I was thinking of looking through an eyepiece, the right word here might should be shine at the lens(es), and look at the lens(es). Not shine nor look at side of a lens.

Possibly. To be honest I examined these lens elements every which way I could. With and without magnifying glasses, table lamps, torches and at as many angles as I could. I looked through them, at them and against different backgrounds. 

I could see no evidence for either of the first two lenses being anything other than singlets. The third element does provide evidence that it is a triplet though. It isn't immediately apparent, but it is there. 

Of course, Bresser may be telling porkies about the number of lenses in the eyepiece, but I don't see why they'd do that. 

What intrigues me is the similarity to the 15mm GSO SuperView which has two single convex lenses followed by a doublet. 

 

 

serveimage.jpeg.c9699ddbe62078a01d2c537652b7d761.jpeg

Hill of beans.

Edited by Mak the Night
Has Beans
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, orion25 said:

LOL!

We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.

~ Henry V, in Act IV Scene iii 18–67.

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Mak the Night said:

I'm convinced this is a triplet, although there are those here who refute it, which is interesting as they don't provide any proof of their own to show otherwise. Possibly a classic case of CAIS (Cranial Anal Interface Syndrome).

I suggest you re-read the thread. No one is refuting what you have said. You have posted some photos that are not clear enough for us to see for ourselves and so we are trusting that what you say is correct. At this point I think you owe everyone else an apology.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they installed a doublet and advertise has a triplet. They do that occasionally has  "the Chinese hard drive scam", this is one example bellow.

They install a small USB key inside a HDD enclosure and they sell it the price of a HDD. This scan could work with the older generations...

http://blog.gsmarena.com/how-do-you-spot-fake-chinese-usb-hard-drives-well-you-take-them-apart/

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.