Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_lunar_close-ups.thumb.jpg.88a09e422111459fcea8be71befc7874.jpg

Recommended Posts

This is kind of dumb, but so am I. I've noticed that some people have a little signature or excerpt that is always at the end of every post describing their telescopes or equipment and wondered how I would add one. Excuse my ignorance, I am very new to this site

Edited by Mr_Timn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mr_Timn said:

This is kind of dumb, but so am I. I've noticed that some people have a little signature or excerpt that is always at the end of every post describing their telescopes or equipment and wondered how I would add one. Excuse my ignorance, I am very new to this site

Click on your name at the top right, click account settings, and then you will see "signature" option on the left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go into account settings, then under signature you can set yourself one. There are limitations to length I believe though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

g'day Mr Timn,

Being a moderator I'm embarrassed to say I'm not sure, but I seem to recall something like ten posts before a signature can be edited. I will try and find out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, RayD said:

Click on your name at the top right, click account settings, and then you will see "signature" option on the left.

Thanks a ton. Sorry for the inconvenience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries. I'll let you know when I do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes from recent experience having passed that milestone I can confirm 10 posts is what you need, then you can create a signature :) .

Cheers, Magnus

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Knighty2112 said:

There are limitations to length I believe though.

Gus

Refractors : Opticstar AR90S 90mm f5.5, Celestron Omni 120mm f8.3  / Maksutov : Celestron 4SE 101mm f13 / SCT : Celestron C8 f10  / EP's Need to list / Solar Lunt Wedge with Polarizing & Solar Continuum filters / StandsAZ3 - Porta 1 - Skytee II - Celestron 6/8SE Goto - Berlebach Uni28 tripod / Filters: Semi APO, UHC, OIII, LPF, red, blue, yellow, grey moon and planetary filters Binoculars: Strathspey Marine 7x50 - Pentax PCF WPII 12x50  / Misc : Celestron Skyportal wifi / Orion binocular mount

 

That's a fairly generous limit in your case :happy7:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, domstar said:

Gus

Refractors : Opticstar AR90S 90mm f5.5, Celestron Omni 120mm f8.3  / Maksutov : Celestron 4SE 101mm f13 / SCT : Celestron C8 f10  / EP's Need to list / Solar Lunt Wedge with Polarizing & Solar Continuum filters / StandsAZ3 - Porta 1 - Skytee II - Celestron 6/8SE Goto - Berlebach Uni28 tripod / Filters: Semi APO, UHC, OIII, LPF, red, blue, yellow, grey moon and planetary filters Binoculars: Strathspey Marine 7x50 - Pentax PCF WPII 12x50  / Misc : Celestron Skyportal wifi / Orion binocular mount

 

That's a fairly generous limit in your case :happy7:

Hehe! Well, I did squeeze a lot into the allotted 5 lines there I agree! ;) 

Edited by Knighty2112

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've filled in the signature box but nothing happens. Must be me. Bit sleepy 😴

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, TSRobot said:

I've filled in the signature box but nothing happens. Must be me. Bit sleepy 😴

YES it worked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm on my mobile.....no signature shows. Modern tech is still emerging 🤣😀😁😄😃😅

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Turn your mobile to landscape

 No difference.  Honestly  though. This is no  biggie anyhow 😎😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Samsung doesn't do it but my other mobile devices do when in landscape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not showing on mobile is intentional and makes the site work better on smaller screens / slower processors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Ags said:

Not showing on mobile is intentional and makes the site work better on smaller screens / slower processors.

No problemo 😁😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rashka
      I have seen a great local offer for a national geographics telescope 76/700,
      but the catch is that the view finder is broken, is it possible to replace this?
       
    • By JohnSadlerAstro
      Hi,
      I've been into astrophotography for several years now, but I can't seem to make much improvement between images. Looking at the images in the Deep-Sky section with clean, white galaxies and perfect smooth backgrounds has got me thinking about what I'm doing wrong.
      I know I can achieve better images with the setup I've got, and I really want to improve in time for the summer nebulae. Is there any advice anyone can give?
      This is a diagram of my setup. My 1000d is modded. I use PHD drift align, and with that running my guiding is to within 2 seconds. I use APT for dithering and image collection, DSS for stacking, and GIMP 16-Bit for processing. A quick note at this point -- ive heard lots about StarTools and other programs, what is the best choice program which wont cost a few hundred pounds?
      Collimation has always been a bit of a difficult one for me, I've tried using both a Cheshire and a laser, but I never seem to get properly coma or gradient free images.

       
      These are the kind of results I'm getting--the main issues I can see are horrible backgrounds (dithering doesn't seem to be able to remove the dark frame scratches) and really grimy colour, but there is also coma and gradient/vignette which refuses to be corrected by flats. (I take my flats through some white fabric pointing at notepad open on my laptop.)

      A big issue for me has always been imaging time--where I live the council turns off the lights each night at midnight. For some reason, although I will often have the setup running from midnight until 3 in the morning, everything seems to go wrong after an hour. For example, the guiding crashes, or a glow appears in the images and wont go away, or hundreds of aircraft seem to pass overhead and streak everything . 
      As the setup became more and more complicated, it began to take more and more time to set up: last imaging session it took 2.5 hours from opening the garage door to starting the first proper exposure. This makes everything far more difficult and time-consuming.
      Does anyone have any tips or suggestions on how I can solve these issues, or just improve my imaging in general?
      Thanks for looking
      John
    • By Mendrinos
      My Orion Starseeker IV mount has recently started acting weirdly in that it will continue to spew even after the movement buttons have been released, this will then render all buttons on the handset useless as nothing will work until it is switched off and on again. I contacted Orion and they claimed it may be faulty optical encoders but they haven’t yet replied on how I can fix it and I don’t really want to pay too much to fix it. Does anyone have any ideas on how I could fix it myself?
    • By Roger2525
      Hi I'm in desperate need of help! I have just brought a 2nd hand Skywatcher 127 mak. Have checked the collimation and it appears ok, have left the telescope out in the open for an hour and have a nice dew cover for it. 
      However I can't get the tracking sorted, the view finder is a nightmare and overhead objects I'm almost on my back, but worse of all I've just had a look at Jupiter which admittedly is low down in the sky but I can't get it to look more than a bright star. I have tried 10,15,25mm lenses and a Barlow but it just appears as a bright dot. When I do increase the size it goes out of focus and you get a circle with the black dot in the centre.
      I have read great things about this scope but it's hopeless for dso cos you can't find them and I fear the planets will be hopeless as well given what I've experienced with Jupiter. How on earth do you get planets large enough to see a bit more detail other than a dot of light?
      I think I will sell the scope on and just get a good pair of binoculars. Any advice?
       
       
       
    • By beni
      All I have with my celestron c102-AZ is a finderscope and a 20mm lense. What are a few barlows/ lenses/ accessories that I need or should have. My budget is about 500$ or less.
      The c102-AZ takes 1.25" lenses/ barlows.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.