Jump to content

stargazine_ep45_banner.thumb.jpg.71f13bfceacd5e3df366d82c2b6f5f9b.jpg

Atmospheric dispersion corrector: Omegon v. ZWO


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Mine's a ZWO brand that I got from First Light Optics and I'm 100% happy with it and their service. The disadvantage of the cheaper designs (like ZWO) is that the image shifts a bit as you adjust the

Absolutely! On an excellent night with jupiter or Mars near zenith I think a dedicated "planetary" eyepiece perhaps has a slight advantage over something like a skywatcher plossl. But with planets 15

As someone mentioned earlier, 'Omegon' is Astroshop's own brand label so it is unlikely you will find a stockist here in the UK but the original ZWO ADC has been available in the UK (at several retail

Posted Images

Please post directly into SGL, 

 

Here is the whole text from your PDF.

 

I got a fairly lukewarm reception to a previous thread concerning the ZWO atmospheric dispersion corrector but threads in CN and postings on YouTube seem to indicate they are useful for planetary work at low altitudes, Now Omegon have introduced a similar product: https://www.astroshop.eu/field-flatteners-other-photo-accessories/omegon-adcatmospheric-dispersion-corrector/p,53049 Omegon will sell direct but as they share premises with Astroshop in Bavaria I guess Omegon products are bought in from the Far East to be branded by Astroshop.

Same price whether direct or through Astroshop. Omegon is not a big name in UK but their other products are well-reviewed The Zwo item, sold throughout the world, sells at a similar price and is listed here by TS, for example: https://www.teleskopexpress.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p8504_ZWO-ADC-AtmosphericDispersion-Corrector---T2-and-1-25--connection.html I like the red ring scale on the Omegon and it is slightly cheaper, otherwise cannot see much difference. If anyone has any views on any aspect of this topic I would be grateful for some feedback.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Ant said:

Please post directly into SGL, 

 

 

 

I

Thanks Ant.  My cut and past didn't work - hence the pdf.  Sadly, still no response.  Not a popular topic, I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've tried to find out whether we'd benefit for visual only f/6, but the technology seems more geared to refractors and imaging than for dobs. Am I wrong that the benefit is chiefly (or even solely) color correction? Also, in image comparos of with and without, I couldn't discern any appreciable differences. Finally, it seemed to require in-focus and we're just too tight on that, but I'd be interested to understand it better. (We're also tree-lined and tend to aim higher, but maybe the benefits accrue even for commonly bad seeing?)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, laowhoo said:

 

I've tried to find out whether we'd benefit for visual only f/6, but the technology seems more geared to refractors and imaging than for dobs. Am I wrong that the benefit is chiefly (or even solely) color correction? Also, in image comparos of with and without, I couldn't discern any appreciable differences. Finally, it seemed to require in-focus and we're just too tight on that, but I'd be interested to understand it better. (We're also tree-lined and tend to aim higher, but maybe the benefits accrue even for commonly bad seeing?)

The principle is to correct colour distortion caused by diffraction in the thicker atmosphere at low altitudes. By careful adjustment the diffraction is reversed.  There are lots of articles written on the subject.  This one by Damian Peach (http://www.damianpeach.com/images/articles/JBAA dispersion Peach.pdf) is an example.  Damian is one of the world's foremost imagers but other users confirm that there are tangible benefits for planetary observation.  Mars will be very close this year, but low in the sky.  For me it's proved impossible since I took up the pastime three years ago to get a decent look at Mars and I'm prepared to spend the money to get a better view than might otherwise be the case.  A number of members of the Cloudy Nights forum have given positive reviews of the ZWO ADC for planetary observing.  No one has been forthcoming on the Omegon.  Few people on SGL seem to have an opinion so check out Cloudy Nights, maybe, for more direct advice from satisfied users.  Both the designs my topic was about work on the same principle and are significantly cheaper than anything available previously - hence my interest.  I hope this helps.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Fascinating. Airy actually developed an EP to do away w/ the need for a separate corrector

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1967Obs....87...41F

Then there are these

http://paquettefamily.ca/astro/star_study/

http://skyinspector.co.uk/atm-dispersion-corrector--adc

http://www.ianmorison.com/combating-atmospheric-dispersion/

And Ian does add that our star diagonal is in the way. I had already read some CN feedback early in the day. I'll revisit those w/ a better understanding/appreciation, even if we can't use it (we only have about 1/4" add'l in travel for standard EPs).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the principle has been known for many years, it's the affordability that is different.  The ASH and Pierro Astro ADCs can still be bought but the ASH for double the price of the Omegon and, in the latter case, for the same price as an 8" Dob.  It would be wonderful to be able to see one in use and make a judgment.  As prices drop perhaps they will become more commonplace.  In the meantime I'm setting aside my pocket money for a purchase in early summer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m visual only and did get a zwo adc when they first came out a year or so back. I tried it briefly on Jupiter. But it was quite fiddly to use and I found that binoviewing made a much better difference for me. I think combining an adc and a binoviewer would be tricky.

So I sold the zwo adc and just stick to my binoviewers now. I know another SGL member that also got a zwo adc and also found it fiddly and didn’t have much impact visually. We both use refractors.

I think there ADC may be more useful for imaging than visual.

For the mars opposition this summer I’ve decided to fly south to tenerife to catch it higher in the sky.

Edited by GavStar
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, GavStar said:

I’m visual only and did get a zwo adc when they first came out a year or so back. I tried it briefly on Jupiter. But it was quite fiddly to use and I found that binoviewing made a much better difference for me. I think combining an adc and a binoviewer would be tricky.

So I sold the zwo adc and just stick to my binoviewers now. I know another SGL member that also got a zwo adc and also found it fiddly and didn’t have much impact visually. We both use refractors.

I think there ADC may be more useful for imaging than visual.

For the mars opposition this summer I’ve decided to fly south to tenerife to catch it higher in the sky.

That's a valuable comment when it comes from a user - even a disappointed user!  I do my observing mainly during the summer months at 43 degrees N but the planets this summer will all, so far as I can discover, be low in the sky.  Weather the last two summers in SW France has not been good for stargazing but if we do get a good summer this year atmospheric dispersion could be quite high.  I know from other reports about the need to adjust by minute amounts and would be prepared for that.  I have the kit for imaging but not much chance to use it so far.  Maybe this year.  Good luck in Tenerife.

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Ags said:

Dare I suggest a yellow filter would be a cheaper option? For visual at least...

Thanks Agnes.  I'll try every filter in my box once I get the opportunity but not convinced any of them will be that effective.

Off topic, my grandmother's name was Vanderhoek.  Her grandfather emigrated from Dordrecht in the 19th century so I've always had a soft spot for the Dutch.  Heel erg bedankt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Atmospheric dispersion is just refraction and so affect extreme reds and blues more. A yellow filter cuts off the extreme ends of the spectrum, leaving a sharper albeit lemony image. In theory anyway :happy11:

Edited by Ags
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Merlin66 said:

Atmospheric dispersion is a real issue in spectroscopy!!! The entrance slit has to be orientated to collect all the spectral data....

 

Atmospheric_Dispersion_spots.png

I'm delighted to leave that field entirely in your hands, Merlin!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I've been using a relatively inexpensive ADC (cost me about £130) for a few months now and I find it a game changer! It's true, one can use filters but unless it's an interference filter with a very narrow bandpass, one will only be eliminating about 2/3 of the dispersion (which is still pretty good for the £5 price tag I'll grant you!). I'm finding with the planets so low at the moment, having the ADC is the difference between a blurry mush and a half decent view. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, timwetherell said:

Actually I've been using a relatively inexpensive ADC (cost me about £130) for a few months now and I find it a game changer! It's true, one can use filters but unless it's an interference filter with a very narrow bandpass, one will only be eliminating about 2/3 of the dispersion (which is still pretty good for the £5 price tag I'll grant you!). I'm finding with the planets so low at the moment, having the ADC is the difference between a blurry mush and a half decent view. 

 

Thanks, Tim.  That's exactly what I expected to learn if the ADC is used correctly.  The cost is about what one would pay for either the ZWO or Omegon.  May I ask which is yours, please?  By using coloured filters you inevitably block off an element of light whereas with the clear prisms in the ADC there may be some light loss but the full spectrum would presumably still be present, if slightly reduced.  I've been in England for a couple of months now and am impatient to get back to France where all me astro gear is kept.  The first clear night I'll try out various filters but I'm even more persuaded now that the ADC is top of the birthday present list.

Thanks again, Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Relpet said:

Thanks, Tim.  That's exactly what I expected to learn if the ADC is used correctly.  The cost is about what one would pay for either the ZWO or Omegon.  May I ask which is yours, please?  

 

Mine's a ZWO brand that I got from First Light Optics and I'm 100% happy with it and their service. The disadvantage of the cheaper designs (like ZWO) is that the image shifts a bit as you adjust the prisms but that's something I can live with given the very reasonable price. The total range of motion is only about 20 minutes of arc so it's not really an issue. And of course once adjusted for a given elevation, it stays very much the same from night to night. Now I just pop it in each morning observing jupiter - Other than rotating the whole thing to minimise the dispersion, no other messing about is usually required. I did this sketch this morning with my 7" refractor (Jupiter on the meridian and about 20° elevation) LHS with the ADC - beautiful view of the red spot  RHS without the ADC - can just about make out the equatorial bands. Of course it won't correct for the worse seeing associated with low elevation but I'd say it makes more difference than just about any other eyepiecey/filtery thing I've ever bought!

5a72de1223053_Jupiterwithandwithoutatmosphericdispersioncorrector.jpg.38fc4cc30df9f4958f6cd56c73efedbb.jpg

Edited by timwetherell
  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, timwetherell said:

Mine's a ZWO brand that I got from First Light Optics and I'm 100% happy with it and their service.  I'd say it makes more difference than just about any other eyepiecey/filtery thing I've ever bought!

5a72de1223053_Jupiterwithandwithoutatmosphericdispersioncorrector.jpg.38fc4cc30df9f4958f6cd56c73efedbb.jpg

'Nuff said, Tim.  Brilliant sketches.  7" refractor, eh?  Oh. Blimey.  There's another giant step forward from my 3".

Thanks a lot.

Peter

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
13 hours ago, Moonshane said:

Blimey Tim. Is the difference that pronounced? I had no idea!

I'm finding it so most days. I guess the thing with low elevation is that it also comes with more pronounced seeing related problems too. On some days when the seeing is so bad one is looking through a shimmering river of air then it's seeing that contributes most to image degradation rather than dispersion so the effect of the ADC is less noticeable. But when the seeing is good, it's very, very much better with the ADC. Prior to owning one, I thought dispersion was just adding a coloured halo to the top and bottom of the planet. But thinking about it further, it's actually smearing the RGB right across the disc, so it's like looking through a photoshop motion blur filter. I'm definitely an enthusiastic convert to these things - especially for £130 which is not peanuts, but it's not crazy money in amateur astronomy terms either :)

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You' be better I reckon for this purpose (and if you have restricted budget and with planets low)  to buy a cheaper good quality plossl and an ADC rather than an ultra expensive planetary eyepiece. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/02/2018 at 11:38, Moonshane said:

You' be better I reckon for this purpose (and if you have restricted budget and with planets low)  to buy a cheaper good quality plossl and an ADC rather than an ultra expensive planetary eyepiece. 

I never quite got how you define a planetary EP.  I do have some good, some very good and a couple of excellent EPs in 1.25 and 2 inch sizes ranging from 5mm to 38mm so I'm guessing I just need the ADC.  Still waiting for some indication that the skies might start clearing more than six hours a month before making a purchase.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely! On an excellent night with jupiter or Mars near zenith I think a dedicated "planetary" eyepiece perhaps has a slight advantage over something like a skywatcher plossl. But with planets 15 degrees above the horizon dispersion and seeing effects will be 10,000x more significant than eyepiece differences. I think once upon a time before computer ray tracing, ED glass and multicoatings something like a monocentric would have been spectacularly better than say a Huygens eyepiece on planets. But today I don't think there's nearly so much difference especially since generic plossls are often really quite well made. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By tooth_dr
      I've been trying to image a couple of galaxies per night, one pre and one post flip.  On early Saturday morning at 1:30am I changed over to M82, and acquired 63 x 3 mins subs, OSC, totalling 3 hours and 9 minutes of data. 
      Camera: ZWO 2600MC at -10 deg C, gain 100, offset 50
      Telescope: Skywatcher 250PX (blue tube), 1200mm F4.7
      Mount: Mesu e200
      Guiding: ZWO OAGv2, 290MM, PHD2
      Filters: None
      Software: APT for capture, APP and PS for processing
       
      I havent really had a chance to get much use out of this camera since I bought it in December, and I havent processed many OSC images before.  I've a bit of work to do, but still very happy with the quality of the data for just 3 hours of integration time.  I would like to add some Ha to this, but purposely didnt bother during the recent clear spell, as it was moonless nights and I gathered some broadband data on other targets instead.
       
      CC welcome.
      Adam

    • By GHOSTGOJ
      hello,
      I have been imaging the California nebula and found that there was a large gradient in the final image. I have now taken some flat frames for the setup and found that the gradient was in all of the photos and took up about 1/3 of the sensor space. 
       
      I have attached an image of a flat frame to show the issue. 
       
      I am currently using a skywatcher esprit 100ed with my ASI 294 MC PRO. Between the two of them are, field flattened, ZWO OAG, 2 spacers and ontology l-enhance filter. I have checked down the objective and can see no issues with the alignment up to the filter. All threads are screwed in correctly with a snug fit, and there are no massive pieces of debris covering the objective.
      need help ASAP please.
      cheers,
      george

    • By KEJ
      Restoring a Backup on a Mac
       
      Something else I came across and a chap called Terry on Facebook had a solution.
      Again, you might already know this, but just in case.
       
      Backup
      You buy a new ASIAIR Pro, you are pretty much advised that one of the first things you should do, is to create a backup of your software(includes your license key) from the supplied SD card.
      And one of the common methods suggested for Mac users is to use the “Apple Pi Baker” program/application.
        
       
      So, I used the application to create my backup and saved it in a safe place, in fact I made two copies(belt and braces).
      Then, yesterday, I thought I should really try to restore one of these backups to make sure they actually work, else what is the point of having a backup for that rainy day.
      And actually, I will keep the original safe and use my copy going forward.
       
      Restore
      So, I inserted a new blank SD card(Fat32) and started the restore process, letting it run its course.
      Once it had finished, I did a quick eye ball to compare the copy to the original and all the files appeared to be there.
       
       
       
      I then plugged the restored SD card back into the ASIAIR Pro, but the device would not start/boot up!
      Just in case, I then reformatted another SD card and tried that one, but still no good.
      I then created another backup from the original SD card(so all in all I had img and zip versions) and tried to restore them, the same result, fail.
       
       On further investigation, it looks like this is fairly common.
       Terry on ASIAIR Facebook group suggested downloading the file from the ZWO website, but then using your own License file.
       
       
      I then used the ASIAIR PRO link above(from the “How_to_Restore_ASIAIR_OS.pdf” on line doc)  to get the file.
      First, keeping a copy of my zwoair_license safe of course(still on the original SD card).
      The file is pretty large, unzips to about 31 GB and takes a while to download(9GB zipped) even on cable.

       
      I then restored(using Apple Pi Baker) this new downloaded file to my new SD card and once it had completed, I then overwrote(replaced) the 
      existing “zwoair_license” file with my original(my unique supplied copy).
      Next, I then inserted the new copied/restored SD card into the ASIAIR Pro and it started.
      Finally, I then connected via the ASIAIR app using my IPhone and was prompted to update the firmware to the latest version which I did.
       
      Happy Ending
      Bingo all good, the original SD card supplied by ZWO stored in a safe place and I am now using this copy going forward.
       
    • By javaruba
      Hi all,
      After detecting a small fracture on the edge of the protective window of my ASI294MC Pro some time ago, I managed to replace it with a new one. ZWO describes the glass as "ZWO D32 AR" for the ASI294. AR probably stands for anti-reflective, not sure. I was wondering if the glass should be installed pointing in a specific direction, or is the anti-reflection both ways? I'm seeing some halos while pointing at bright stars but could be something else, see attached start image as a reference (a single frame exposure).
      Thanks in advance for any help.
      Kind regards,


    • By pete_81
      Hi all, just getting straight to the point.
      Just got a Rasp Pi 400 (equivalent to Pi4-4GB), and looking to get into guiding through this as it's obviously a popular (and successful) technique.
      Plan is to have the RPi as mini computer at home, running it with RaspPiOS (supplied on µSD with the full kit), then use it with a SECOND micro SD card for astro - I figure having another SD to run Astroberry (as on SGL) may ignore any issues with the family using the pi for other stuff in the house, giving a stand-alone 'computer' as the OS and files would be available on different SD's.
      From this point, I'd setup as follows:
      Connect the RPi directly via USB to the mount (it's the newer SW-AZ-EQ6Pro with the USB-B port on the mount)
      Guidescope (240mm f/4) with T7C (equivalent to ZWO Mini) again USB-B direct to RPi
      Nikon DSLR (either on telescope or using camera lenses) connected to RPi via Nikon USB (using the 3 USB points on the RPi-400) to control capture and later using this for plate-solving (but that's not for just right now!)
      I don't spy any flaws in the plan, it's just going to be a matter of testing and setting things up hoping to follow the guide for Astroberry as linked to SGL below...
      Or is there an alternative OS? From brief reading, Astroberry includes KStars & PHD2 which is what I've got for use on the macbook (although not used in earnest as it doesn't appear to like the cold too much!)
      What about guiding software - I know KStars comes with it's own, and can run PHD2 from within, with PHD2 being the industry standard (and simplest?) to use?
      Control will then be sitting in the warm via OS-X, which seems to be again a common technique as I've had posts on my other questions about this!
      Thoughts???
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.