Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

AKB

First light for Atik 460EX.. odd-shaped stars?

Recommended Posts

An unexpectedly short EAA session on the night of January 18 led to only one capture... it would have been longer but for the clouds, and I seem to have a problem with star shapes.

This is from my Quattro 8", successfully used before, but with a new (to me) camera and imaging train.  Here's a 20 second sub as captured on screen (Nebulosity) and then a post-processed image with 22 of them stacked (for a total of 7 minutes, 20 seconds)

 

20180118_Orion-Quattro-460EX-20s.thumb.jpg.9ff8dee3a8c0f60e1aabcd6b9705032c.jpg

20180118_Orion-Quattro-460EX-22x20s.thumb.jpg.49929131e729b02dfc4887211a13e966.jpg

 

The problem, though, is with the star shapes:

Poor_stars.jpg.10fb35e497eb3f83b3990f2bfd478792.jpg

 

The image train is:

  • Coma Corrector (previously used and absolutely fine)
  • ZWO OAG (new for Christmas, but not in use yet, except as a spacer)
  • Baader variable spacer
  • Atik 460EX mono CCD cooled to -12C (this is 'Gina-cam', thanks @Gina!)

Everything is threaded connections, I don't think it's tilt, and it doesn't look like a classic CC spacing issue.  This is unguided, and certainly the PA wasn't perfect, but collimation was (I believe) good.  The OAG prism was way out of the way from the long-side of the chip, so my hope is that this might be caused by the high wind that night?  (Mount is an Avalon M-Uno.)

Any suggestions/advice?  I will, of course, be trying again in better conditions, if they ever arrive.

Tony

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the camera is at fault, I am wondering - pinched optics?  Can you even get pinched optics with a Newtonian?

However as you have used this scope previously with no problems, it will hopefully be the wind as you suggest, but am looking at that halo around the bright star just off the screen on the right and it does seem to be off centre.

Hopefully some-one with more technical savvy than me will come along soon. 

Carole 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, carastro said:

I am wondering - pinched optics?  Can you even get pinched optics with a Newtonian?

Thanks Carole.  Yes you can, but no it's not.  I had the mirror cell out the day before to finish blackening the bevel and the mirror edges.  It had rotated in the cell from when I first did it.  I left it loose enough to be able to do that again.  The mirror clips were actually clear of the mirror surface.  Good thought, though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Thalestris24 said:

Looks suspiciously like thermal effects to me - did you do a decent cooldown before imaging?

Ah, an excellent suggestion!   I hadn't had the roof open for very long, it's true.  I'd not really meant to do anything serious at all, and was just initially looking to see if I had the spacing right.  It was also early in the evening and the sun had actually been out (gasp!) in the late afternoon. 

I'd say that was a prime candidate.  Let's say so, and put my mind at rest.  Next time out (with a longer cool-down) will tell!

Thanks indeed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Nicola Hannah Butterfield
      First image from my new NEQ6 Pro driven mount, all other images before this were static.
      Sky Watcher 200P prime focus, 10x 60's lights, darks, bias and flats. ISO 200
      Bortle 6
      Yes I know there is a plane track through it.
    • By alexbb
      I've been processing this image for quite a long now.
      I started acquiring data the last season when I only managed to shoot 3 panels with the Canon 6D through the Esprit 80 for a total of ~7h.
      This season I restarted and I added more data and covered a wider area. So a mix of portrait and landscape panels were planned and shot with the same scope and camera. Now every pixel represents at least 3-4h of integration, some have more.
      All the above were shot from Bortle 2-3 sites where I traveled sometimes even for an hour of exposure.
      To the RGB data I added 17.5h of Ha, same story with the panels. Some were oriented N-S, others E-W. These were shot with the SW 72ED and the ASI1600 from home and Bortle ~7.
      Then I figured out I still had time and I planned and shot 9 more panels of luminance with the 72ED and ASI1600, each consisting of 1h of exposure.
      I combined all of these into an image, processed it and for the Orion nebula and Running Man nebula I also blended some data I shot last season with the 130PDS and ASI1600 from home.
      Below it's my first final version of all data combined. You can watch it in full resolution on astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/full/jni0w8/ or Flickr: https://flic.kr/p/2iBGUXq
       

    • By Gary Shaw
      Hi All:
      I just acquired a 200mm F4 newtonian from TS Optics which I'll use primarily for Electronic Assisted Observing with several ZWO cmos cameras. 
      My challenge is that my current scope is an F3.6 schmidt newtonian so I have no experience with coma correctors or spacers/adaptors in the optical train. TS tells me that I need 55mm from the coma corrector (TSGPU) to the sensor. They provided 40 mm of various adaptors and spaces and I guess I get the remaining 15mm from the camera housing itself - as shown in the attached image. The threads on several of the adaptors(see notes) are bad so those pieces need to be replaced but, once that's fixed, I have four questions for this community:
      1. ...is this odd assortment of parts and pieces typically how one goes about achieving the required 55mm dimension  from the Coma Corrector to the camera sensor? Just seems that there must be a simpler, and sturdier way to do this without having to use 4-5 separate parts.
      2. Once all the adaptors add up to the correct dimension and are attached to the Coma Corrector, where does one locate the whole assembly(with coma corrector) in the focuser draw tube?   Is it a matter of trial and error?
      3. If one did not care about viewing peripheral stars looking a bit like comets and didn't, therefore, use the coma corrector, would any of these adaptor/spacers be needed to bring the camera to focus so one could observe using, say, Sharpcap 3.2 Pro or other software?
      4. If I were to use a filter or two, where would these best be located in the lineup and do they work with the various threads and adaptors? 
      Apologies for my lack of experience and thank you for any help you can provide me in understanding how to observe and image with coma correctors 
      Cheers
      Gary

    • By Savage234
      I recently upgraded to a purpose made astro-camera (Atik Horizon Color). The learning curve has definitely been noticeable, but I cant figure a couple things out.  For some reason the pictures are grey scale when using N.I.N.A. I have tried different binning and formats, but the image is always black and white. 
      If I use the ATIK software (Infinity,Dusk) there is an option for 'Color Binning', and that seems to have fixed it for those programs, but N.I.N.A doesn't seem to have that option (you can not select anything for binning, or select 1x1, 2x2 ect.). But what makes it weirder is that the preview is always color using N.I.N.A. I used a pinhole lens cover to take pictures of my computer screen and it always shows up as color images. However, if I take that exact image file that previews in color and move it to pixinsight, it is grey-scale. 
      Is this a binning thing, file format problem? At this point I am just confused, if the preview of the image is color shouldn't the image data be color as well?
      So far all the problems I have had with this camera have just been simple things that were new to me, but this one is really throwing me for a loop. Thanks for any help. 
      I've attached a couple images. The first you can see the NINA preview is color, as well with the couple other I took in the bottom right. And the other in a photo of trying to color saturate the stretched image in Pixinsight, and it says that it cannot saturate a grey-scale image.  I have tried this with Tif, Fits, and various binning types. 
    • By arkosg
      Hello everyone!  
      After a pretty dreary September and part of October, I was finally able to get out with students to do some viewing.  Here are some of the objects viewed over two nights using Starlight Live software on my Borg 77edii (f/4) and Borg 125SD (f/5) with a Trius 694 mono camera.  In most cases an IDAS NB-1 "nebula" filter was employed to help with the suburban light pollution in our skies.  The first night (mainly 125SD) was much steadier and drier, but along the coast we take what we can get when it isn't raining!  ;-D
      It's so much fun to see these objects from less-than-optimal skies... I often intend to quit much earlier, only to find myself saying (over and over!) "... oh, look, <object> is coming up... I should just have a look at that before I pack up."  And then another hour goes by!
      Cheers,
      - Greg A
       
      Eastern & Western Veil

      Comparison of FOV between two scopes on the NA Nebula

       
      Again, FOV comparison on the Elephant Trunk Nebula

       
      And again, with the Rosette Nebula

      Pacman Nebula through the 125SD:

      And Crab Nebula:

      And the Cocoon Nebula:

      Finally, a few wider shots of objects using the Borg77: Flame/Horsehead, California Nebula, Pelican Nebula and Andromeda Galaxy:

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.