Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


Recommended Posts

The Fighting Dragons of Ara ( NGC 6188 )


( please click / tap on image to see larger )

The Fighting Dragons of Ara ( NGC 6188 )

Bright Nebula NGC 6188 and open cluster NGC 6193 are embedded 4,300 light years away in the Sagittarius arm of our Milky Way galaxy and can be seen with the naked eye south of Scorpius in the constellation of Ara.

With powerful stellar winds and energetic ultra-violet radiation, massive stars sculpt the interstellar gas and dust of the nebula into wonderful shapes and cause the interstellar gas to brightly fluoresce.  

Closer to the hot young stars of the cluster, bright blue “sunlight” reflects off the clouds of gas and dust to produce the blue reflection nebulae seenin the image.

Magnitude +5.19, RA 16h 41m 42s, Dec -48deg 48' 46".
Approx. 3800 light years away.

Image details:

This is an HDR image constructed from exposures ranging from 2 seconds to 240 seconds in length.  The aim was to capture the faint stars and details in the nebula whilst at the same time maintaining colour in the bright stars without clipping the highlights.

Plate Solution:
Resolution ........ 1.336 arcsec/px
Rotation .......... 90.002 deg ( North is to the right )
Focal ............. 1475.57 mm
Pixel size ........ 9.56 um
Field of view ..... 58' 28.5" x 39' 0.8"
Image center ...... RA: 16 40 09.903  Dec: -48 41 27.00

Orion Optics CT12 Newtonian ( mirror 300mm, fl 1200mm, f4 ).
Corrector: ASA 2" Coma Corrector Quattro 1.175x.
Effective Focal Length / Aperture : 1410mm f4.7.

Mount: Skywatcher AZ Eq6 GT.
Guiding: TSOAG9 Off-Axis-Guider, Starlight Xpress Lodestar X2, PHD2 .

Nikon D5300 (unmodified) (sensor 23.5 x 15.6mm, 6016x4016 3.9um pixels).

Blue Mountains, Australia 
Moderate light pollution ( pale green zone on darksitefinder.com map ).

Capture ( 24 June 2017 ).
8 sets of sub-images with exposure duration for each set doubling ( 2s to 240s ) all at ISO800.
34 x 240s + 10 each @ 2s to 120s.

Processing ( Pixinsight - 19 Aug 2017, 13 Jan 2018  ).
Calibration: master bias, master flat and no darks.
Integration in 8 sets.  HDR combination.


This is a reprocessed version using the data I captured earlier in the year...


Edited by MikeODay
  • Like 8

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A timeline of my progress on capturing and processing “The Fighting Dragons of Ara”...

July 2015:    5523A45F-D61B-48A9-BE91-B9FCFE002C90.jpeg.cdb5795f0578a2e35ec4e8c894292258.jpeg

June 2017:  7F3232DB-EF21-4D57-AFE0-D0E3E33A1976.jpeg.b0071f46697b0fc139da113885f71386.jpeg

Jan 2018:    A71CA557-5D50-4661-9FB2-94692C001712.jpeg.8268f8ce7617eb00c9f4babd20c8d6db.jpeg

I believe the latest is the closest to the “true colours” of the stars and I assume the nebula ( with an un-modified camera ).  Note that I did not adjust the saturation or vibrance in the latest image; the bright colours were produced ( retained ? ) by using the new arcsinh tool in Pixinsight to stretch the image.

The colour processing consisted of:
- no adjustment until after HDR combination of the integrated images
- DynamicBackgroundExtraction tool used to remove / reduce the light pollution / sky glow in the HDR image
- determine the “daylight” colour balance factors, adjusted for the average altitude extinction for the main subs, and apply these to the unstretched HDR image
- final minor tweak to the stretched HDR image in Photoshop to reduce the green a little ( I guess from residual light pollution / sky glow ? )
- As I mentioned, no adjustment to saturation or vibrance

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Thalestris24 said:


Thanks, much appreciated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated scrapbook page ...


The Fighting Dragons of Ara ( NGC 6188 ) - scrapbook page    ( please click / tap on image to see larger )

Edited by MikeODay

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


A close up of NGC 6193

With apparent magnitudes of 6.9 and 5.6 respectively, the closely spaced O-type giants HD 150135 and HD 150136 dominate the open cluster NGC 6193 and provide much of the visible light that gives this part of nebula its blue glow.  These stars are also very luminous X-ray sources, with HD 150136 in particular thought to be one of the most luminous sources so far observed in the galaxy. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jamesj01
      Hi everyone - juts purchased my first telescope and am asking for advice on what is best to be seen through this telescope as a starter - have already seen the moon and some distant stars and am comfortable with using all of the eye pieces included. What would anyone recommend?
    • By JMH
      Good morning and thank you in advance for your advice and patience! I am looking to purchase my first telescope, budget around £200. I am overwhelmed by the choice, but am looking for certain things:
      Quite lightweight / easily portable
      Smartphone adapter for taking iPhone pictures
      Specifically interested in looking at planets, ISS, galaxies as well as the moon
      Must be on a tripod and not table-top
      I would be grateful for your expertise. I am in the UK (Suffolk) if that makes a difference! I look forward to learning A LOT here  
    • By Michele Scotti
      Hi everybody - I'm humbled that some of you are following the thread on the 800mm telescope. I thought it was worth starting a sub-topic specifically related to the mirror making.
      So as the works on the mount got halted by the lockdown we had some time to virtually meet-up and discuss the optics for this project.
      The onset was pretty straightforward with an 'if we are doing this we are making the mirror'. And that sorts out the make vs buy, I suppose.
      As of now, the only two things decided so far are the diameter -at 800mm- and the f/3.3 - of course we can accommodate some variance.
      Some aspects of the making are pretty unchartered territories for our club so I'd like to seek some good advice from anybody in terms of direct experience or rather point us at some resources/threads.
      Back-ground: to make it short, our senior member had three 500mm f/5 done years ago. He did of course faster optics up to f/3 among many other mirrors - I actually never asked him how many, uh! He has always worked with full tool and has no experience with slumped glass. Btw we do have some experience in slumping glass but -weirdly enough- not in machining.
      During our initial discussions we boiled the scenarios down to 3:
      float glass, 35/40mm thickness considering 15mm of sagitta. This is a thermal challenge with its big outward mass, it's going to make the machining more of a challenge and the stabilization time longer float glass, 25mm (which seems more of a commercially available), slumped. Trading the thermal challenge with the slumping borosilicate, 25mm, slumped. Tbh this is just a better version of the previous point at a cost that is not prohibitive  
      What are the sources of glass in Europe for thickness over the bog standard 25mm? 
      Disclaimer: this is surely an ambitious endeavor and by no means we are underestimating that. Not only the bigger diameter is a step-up; the fast optics is a challenge too. 
      To start with we have some questions about slumped glass. It looks like an attractive, modern approach to mirrors that exceed a given diameter. I think I saw already some threads specifically about the slumping itself - that's golden.
      However it's the grinding/finishing/parabolizing that is puzzling us. Are there specific techniques or is it the same as the flat back glass?
      Also, how do you support the mirror? Would a support that replicates the telescope mirror cage be appropriate - a 27-point in our case? Or is it a matter to build a concave support that holds the back of the mirror? How accurate/solid should that support be?
      Any experience out there??
      I reckon that's enough as a start - thanks everybody in advance for your contribution.
      Stay safe! Michele
    • By avodcap7
      I have a celesctron nexstar 8SE OTA, to which I attach my focal reducer (0.63x by celestron), the a T-Adapter-SC, a t-ring and then my dslr. Does the T-Adapter affect the performance or use of the focal reducer?
    • By Corpze
      So, I have been testing three different kind of lasers, each one is supposed to be the "best" in each category or what you want to call it, the hotech and HG is almost the same, but whit the difference in how you lock it down.
      The Catseye is very different in how it works.

      I made a Youtube video of my thoughts


      What do you think? which one do you use?

      Regards, Daniel


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.