Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

M45 - First RGB Image in a year!


Xiga

Recommended Posts

Had some nice clear skies last weekend, so I simply had to take advantage of them, even though the temps dropped to -4 on the Saturday night! Thankfully i was able to just move the car a few metres and use the frost-free ground underneath to set up. And boy, what a god send Team Viewer is! I Once i was all set up, i was able to monitor it all from inside the house.

Most of the neighbour's had selfishly decided to light fires, how inconsiderate of them, lol. It was quite annoying though i have to say, seeing all the smoke at times billowing across my FOV! Thankfully i stayed up late though, so i outlasted most of them :icon_razz: It was easily the most productive 2 nights I've had so far. The skies were completely clear all night long on both nights. In the end i managed 11 hrs worth of exposure in total over the 2 nights. I still need to process the Soul Nebula subs (Ha and OIII), hope to get to that later this week, but for now here's the other object i was shooting, good old M45.

So this is 2 hrs 40 mins (16 x 600s) using the Nikon D5300a and an IDAS-D1 filter.

30 Flats, 50 Bias, with aggressive dithering.

Captured with Sequence Generator Pro, stacked in Astro Pixel Processor, and processed in Photoshop.

I may have gone too far with the processing (i tend to do that), what do you guys think? I had an earlier version which was sooooo much smoother, but it was seriously lacking in visible nebulosity, so i kept going! Plus, i wanted to try and eek out some of the surrounding dust, which i just managed to get. I might end up reducing it by 50% in size, due to the noise, haven't decided yet though. C&C welcome as always of course!

The last RGB image i did was a brief go at M42 about a year ago, and that was also taken from home using the same filter. I had forgotten just how hard RGB processing is when not captured from a dark sky!

ps - I've also added a version below with some funky diffraction spikes. Just for fun of course! Although i actually don't mind them :tongue:

M45_v3.jpg

M45_v3.1 (Diff Spikes).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xiga said:

I had forgotten just how hard RGB processing is when not captured from a dark sky!

You result makes it look easy! You've achieved an impressive result, though I do have to check...is that dust in the image or just smoke from your neighbours'? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, alan potts said:

Very nice images, I don't feel you have over done it, for me it is if it believeable, this is, some over colour an image for my tastes, these aran't. I actually like the spikes in some images, it works for me on M45.

Thanks Alan!

26 minutes ago, Filroden said:

You result makes it look easy! You've achieved an impressive result, though I do have to check...is that dust in the image or just smoke from your neighbours'? :)

Cheers Ken!

I had wondered the very same thing, lol. So I kept a reference image at hand while I was processing it. The faint bright and dark lanes seemed to match fairly well, so I think I got lucky :tongue:

 

Capture.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xiga said:

So this is 2 hrs 40 mins (16 x 600s) using the Nikon D5300a and an IDAS-D1 filter.

The last RGB image i did was a brief go at M42 about a year ago, and that was also taken from home using the same filter. I had forgotten just how hard RGB processing is when not captured from a dark sky!

Fantastic result! I don't know about your not dark sky, but I'm far to see that much dust in double exposure time, F4 300mm lens on a mono cooled camera under orange light pollution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, moise212 said:

Fantastic result! I don't know about your not dark sky, but I'm far to see that much dust in double exposure time, F4 300mm lens on a mono cooled camera under orange light pollution.

Thanks Alex!

I can't complain about the skies I have to say. They're not too bad at all. Here's a link showing the LP where I live (Crumlin village):

https://www.lightpollutionmap.info/#zoom=10&lat=7288583&lon=-692096&layers=B0FFFTFFFF

I've taken a couple of images at a proper dark sky site, down at Delamont, and it's so much better. There's no need to use an LPF, and I could expose for well over 10 mins there and still not be sky glow limited. It's only about a 45 min drive away, but the issue with it is safety more than anything, as youths like to drive their cars through it at night so I would never go alone. Plus, I hate the thought of packing everything up and driving there only to find that the clouds have rolled in just after I've set up, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.