Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

deepind

Is Nikon D3200 suitable for astrophotography

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Am intrested in astrophotography,but I couldn’t take a single picture with my D-SLR attached to my celestron astromaster 130 Eq telescope...I have Nikon D3200 and if I capture the sky with lens attached the picture is very noisy and not clear...how can I take pictures of galaxy nebulae etc....

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure lots use that model of Nikon for astro..

With galaxy/nebulae long exposures are the key...its just if you can keep the target in the exact spot for the length of the exposure..so if that's 2 mins or 10 seconds it will depend on how much signal is captured during that exposure..i assume you're using the eq mount supplied with the astromaster? If so then it's not suitable for astrophography.

Or is it thst you're connecting the camera and can't get focus?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, newbie alert said:

I'm sure lots use that model of Nikon for astro..

With galaxy/nebulae long exposures are the key...its just if you can keep the target in the exact spot for the length of the exposure..so if that's 2 mins or 10 seconds it will depend on how much signal is captured during that exposure..i assume you're using the eq mount supplied with the astromaster? If so then it's not suitable for astrophography.

Or is it thst you're connecting the camera and can't get focus?

Hi thanks for reply...if I point towards any star or nebulae ,I can’t even see anything in live view of camera only very bright star like Sirius is seen like a small dot...if I capture without telescope it’s not clear and very white...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your exposure on a static mount is roughly 400/ focal length of lens with your camera. Assume you use the kit lens the longest exposure would be 22 seconds at 18mm.

Iso probably 800-1600 depending on your local light pollution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

    Probably there will be more experienced people than me to answer your question, but i will give you my humble opinion. The camera is not the problem, capturing stars and nebulae, i believe the problem is exposure. Try longer exposures and adjust the ISO accordingly. Experimenting with the exposures and ISOs will eventually lead you to desirable outcome.

 

Clear Skies,

 Kyriakos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before embarking on any type of specialist photography...you need to learn your camera first.....shooting in manual for a start...learning that aperture has influence on exposure times and iso speed etc....to me it seems that the op might be trying to run before even being upright.lol.

First you need to start shooting in manual mode.

When looking through the camera eyepiece (or live view)at night to the sky...all you will see is some little dots and it will look rather uninspiring......it's long exposures(camera shutter left open)that allows the sensor to gather in as much light as possible at the widest aperture available within the lens fitted to the camera (most kit lenses have an aperture of f3.5-f4.5 at it's widest at it's shortest focal length and f6.5-f7.5 at it's widest for it's longest focal length.....and enthusiast/pro lens can be anything from f1.2 -f2.8 prime lenses (fixed focal length)and various f2.8 short zoom lenses can be had....these types of lenses are usually quite  expensive.To be able to achieve long exposures towards the night sky you are pretty much constrained to the five hundred rule....500 divided by the focal length of lens (full frame equivalent)...so eg...I shoot with my olympus omd em5 in with a 12-40 f2.8 lens....this is a micro four thirds sensor and has twice the crop factor of  a full frame equivalent so my 12-40 now becomes 24-80....500 divided 24=20 seconds at the lenses shortest focal length and 500 divided by 80 = 6 seconds at it's longest focal length.....if you want all that heavenly glory for longer exposures...a tracking mount of sorts is going to be needed....but I'd suggest getting used  to the camera on a sturdy tripod and getting some night sky shots with just your lens and getting used to how the camera reacts to the various settings....higher iso...longer exposures etc.hope I have been of some help.

Ps..if you want to use your camera to shoot through the scope...you first need to remove your camera's lens and attach a camera mount adapter and t mount to achieve this....but again to get sharp points of light you will be constrained by the five hundred rule.....500 divided by the focal length of the telescope this time as that has now become the lens.

Edited by Skinnypuppy71
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By ABPhotosUK
      Hello to all,
      I've just acquired my first tracking mount, a Skywatcher Star Adventurer, having dabbled with AP some years ago with a Celestron Nexstar 5SE which I still own but quickly realised back then that I needed an EQ mount. I captured my first ever planetary images this week with the 5SE and my new ZWO ASI290MC - Jupiter and Mars -which I was pleased with as a first stab but clearly need more work and knowledge. Looking forward to contributing more on the forums.
      Clear skies,
      Andy
    • By Peggson
      I shot this yesterday from a Bortle 6 backyard. Edited in Pixinsight and Photoshop
       
      If someone here knows how to remove purple stars, please  help me . I tried defringing but it didn't really work.
      Also the date is wrong should be 9.10.2020. lol
    • By Anthony RS
      Hello,
      I'm selling these 2 filters since I'm getting a mono astro cam. The filters are barely used and in perfect condition, no scratches, no fingerprints, not even dust. They are both amazing filters, probably the best investment I've made. I've attached some images
      taken with these filters, using a 100$ celestron newtonian, a 250$ Canon 500D and the infamous AVX. Also attached are images of the filters showing their perfect condition.
      Astronomik CLS-CCD Canon Clip in Filter: https://www.astronomik.com/en/filter-gegen-lichtverschmtzung-filters-against-lightpollution-lpr/cls-ccd-filter/clip-filter-eos-mit-astronomik-cls-ccd.html
      Original price including VAT is 155 Euros (around USD 182). I got it for around USD230 including VAT, shipping and custom taxes.
      Selling for USD 120.
      Astronomik Ha 12nm Canon Clip in Filter: https://www.astronomik.com/en/clip-filter/clip-filter-canon-aps-c/clip-filter-eos-mit-astronomik-h-alpha-ccd-12nm.html
      Original price including VAT 194 Euros (around USD 228). Got it for around USD 270 including VAT, shipping and custom taxes.
      Selling for USD 180
      I am willing to ship them on my own expense using LibanPost (from Lebanon). Shipping might take time; if you would like to use some other shipment method please contact me to discuss the price. 
      Feel free to buy one or both together.
      Let me know if you have any questions. 
      You can also contact me on <private email address removed>
      Cheers,
      Anthony









    • By endlessky
      I have already posted my first astrophotographic session report in the telescope review thread: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series - Review. But since that is more of a general review/diary of my experience with the new telescope, I feel some of the issues I am having are being buried and they will probably get more visibility if I post them - in a more synthetic version - in a dedicated thread.
      So, a few nights ago (October, the 5th) I took out my new telescope for its first light. All the photos have been taken with the 0.8x flattener/reducer and the Optolong L-Pro 2" filter attached to the reducer. The camera is an astromodified Nikon D5300. The only processing the following pictures have consists in this:
      - AutomaticBackgroundExtractor
      - ColorCalibration
      - Stretch
      Here we have a 90s shot of M31.

      And here's a mosaic generated with the AberrationInspector script.

      What I do like:
      - tightest, smallest, roundest stars I have gotten since I started doing astrophotography at the end of January. Obviously comparing it to what I have been achieving with a kit 70-300mm zoom lens, these can't be anything else but better by orders of magnitude
      What I don't like:
      - star shape not consistent in all areas of the image
      - residual chromatic aberration, especially on stars that are not round: there's clearly some red and blue edges visible
      I didn't expect this from an apochromatic refractor, but maybe it's just because the stars are kinda "smeared", so not all light is focused at the same spot? I don't see this around the center of the image (or, at least, the problem is less pronounced). Maybe I have some tilting in my imaging train/sensor?
      I have been doing some reasoning about it and it seems like a combination of tilting and/or backfocus spacing. According to the following image about backfocus spacing:

      if the stars are elongated radially, the sensor is too close, if they are elongated tangentially, the sensor is too far. But to me it seems I have a little bit of both: in the top right corner, for example, the stars look radially elongated, in the bottom right, they look tangentially elongated. Top left they look tangentially elongated, bottom left also, but a little less. Seems like there has to be some tilting as well, otherwise they would all have a symmetric shape on all corners, correct?
      How do I determine - is there even a way - if the issue is due to tilting only, backfocus only, or the combination of the two? Is there a sure proof way of checking for tilting? Like, rotating the camera and taking pictures with, say, the camera at 0°, 90°, 270° and 360°? If there's tilting, the pattern of the star shapes should follow the camera, correct?
      I also tried splitting the channels in R, G, and B components, doing a star alignment of the blue and red channels with the green as a reference, and recombining the channels. The blue and red edges become a lot less evident, which is good, but obviously the star shapes remain the same.
      In my Telescopius gallery you can also find two other images, Capella and Capella Mosaic showing pretty much the same issues.
      Also, one issue with the guide camera: ZWO ASI 224MC. When attached to the guide scope (Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4), I can't seem to get a "sharp" focus, I even tried on the Moon, and the best I got was a soft lunar disc, with some major features visible, mainly by change of color/brightness (the maria, for example), but no details. The image still seemed blurred/bloated. Is it because of lack of IR blocking filter? I tried the same camera attached to the main refractor, with the L-Pro filter (which blocks UV and IR, as well) and I could focus perfectly. Do I need an IR block filter for guiding or even if the stars appear a little soft, the camera guides just fine?
      Matteo
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.