Jump to content


2 star alignment question synscan az mount


Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

I have been happily using my new skywatcher skymax 127 on a synscan az goto mount and a question occured to me when going through the alignment procedure.

Does the time between centering the first star in the eyepiece and aligning the second star matter.

The reason that I ask is that sometimes the accuracy of the goto differs slightly and I am wondering could it be due to me being too slow to find the next star. I am good with constellation identifying but the star names I only know a few of the major ones such as vega, betelgeuse etc., so I have to rely on a star chart to pick a suitable star which takes maybe about an extra minute. I am wondering if the mount does not keep the 1st star centred due to setup not being fully complete at this point and obviously the earth is still rotating so the star will drift and then the reference point of this star is now not centered when aligning to the 2nd star.

Everything else is always the same as I have already marked the ground where I put the tripod so it goes in the same place every time and levelled it with a spirit level. The power is supplied with a skywatcher powertank so I know its not a battery power problem and all the information is correct such as time/date, elevation, lat/long etc.

It isnt massively out, so far everything I have requested has been in the FOV of my 25mm eyepiece but its just something that I wondered and also whether I could improve things.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've checked in the manual and it doesn't give any information on that, and doing it with mine I can't see that it matters much as long as it's within a couple of minutes. What I have noticed is that there is a little play in the gearing system, so when slewing from left to right and back again at very low speeds it doesn't always move the scope immediately. I think the variation is something like half the field of view with the stock 25mm eyepiece with mine, but some of that could be age related (it's pre-owned and I don't know how old it is, nor how much usage it had). For that reason when I set up I always approach the alignment stars from the same direction for both. e.g. get the star into the bottom left quadrant, and then bring it into position properly. That seems to help. Another thing I do is to ignore the built in spirit level and use a short spirit level across the top of the tripod before mounting the drive unit and scope.

Picking out the stars before using them for alignment helps too. They need to be a distance apart and you don't need to know a large number of them, just the bright ones like Vega, Capella and Sirius, or easy to find like Betelguese, Caph and Deneb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When aligning with my Nexus, because it doesn’t move I use Polaris as my first alignment star, although I’m told I shouldn’t need to. Could you also use Polaris, you wouldn’t need to rush then if it did make a difference? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Synscan's "Brightest Star" alignment, and have also wondered if the time duration to do the manual slew to the first star, and also between aligning the 2 stars, can affect GoTo accuracy. "Mognet" has covered the basics, and I also try to start with the OTA pointing North, and both mount and OTA level. Whilst slewing to the required azimuth, I can save time by setting the altitude scale pointer to the value shown on the handset. Choosing a second star whose name is at the beginning or end of the alphabet, saves time when stepping through the handset-suggested names.

I found that, having aligned on the first star, and accepting the Synscan-suggested second star, it was often behind a roof, fence, or tree; requiring a restart of the alignment process :homework:. I sometimes use Polaris as a second alignment star, but only if it differs, significantly, in both azimuth and altitude, from the first star. If the automatic slew to the second star does not place it in the FOV of my finder, then I tend to start alignment again, as the algorithm does not have a "useful" fix on the first star.

I decided to do a bit of homework to speed things up. I used Stellarium and produced a table of 24 bright stars (rows), setting the date for the middle of the month, for each of the 12 months (columns). I advanced time at dusk, with Stellarium adding the names of the stars as they would become visible to the naked eye. For each month, I selected 3, 4 or 5 of the 24 stars, (avoiding any "hidden" ones), that would give a good Alt/Az separation, and noting, in the table, their general direction (N, NW etc.) that month. Printed out on an A4 sheet, this makes alignment easier. For me, Sirius is only good in February, but Arcturus features from April to September. I did not include Polaris in the table, as I know where it is at a gap in the roof line.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Adder,

Having the same setup as you, I wondered the same thing when I started out aligning.  As you say, it doesn't 'hold' the first star once you've confirmed it, and seems to drift away, especially if you've stepped up to a higher magnification on the first star.  I don't think it makes a big difference, but as Mognet mentioned, if you can wrap up the second star (and third, if you're using 'brightest star' method) in a couple of minutes or thereabouts, you should be fine. 

I time I found I could improve the accuracy of my alignment by getting the chosen star central in the 25mm eyepiece, then checking with a 10mm (and for when i was imaging planets, eventually a 2x or 3x barlowed 10mm) that it was still bang in the centre.  Clearly it takes longer to change out the eyepieces, but once you've done it a few times and have everything to hand when you set up, you can soon whip through it.

Like Geoff, I lost count of the number of times I'd slew to the second star only to find it was out of sight behind trees or houses!  As has been mentioned, the software Stellarium is great to have at hand so you can quickly find out where a particular star is, and you can also get apps for your phone that help you to find your way around the stars too.  Getting familiar with that AZ goto alignment procedure was a great step for me in learning the brighter stars!

All the best,


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yes, timing does matter. The slower you are between getting the 2 stars centered and aligned then the bigger error will be introduced into the goto accuracy.

A top tip to speed things up is to defocus the stars so they become "large circles", it's much easier to centre a large circle than a tiny dot :) 

You need to use high power EP for more accuracy. Stick to the 10mm for alignment process. You can even buy alignment EPs that display a centre cross! (Not really needed though)

As for the scope drifting on the first star, this is because the motors (tracking) are not engaged at this pre-alignment completed stage. Only once you complete the alignment procedure, do the motors start (tracking the earths rotation) and stars will appear to "hold position"


Edited by alanjgreen
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By AstroNebulee
      Hi all
      This will hopefully be the new thread for all things regarding the skywatcher Az Gti mount. Please share anything you think is relevant or ask any questions regarding this stunning and very capable mount. I'm hoping that this will become the central hub for this mount and the place to come to for advice, help, information and knowledge for the Az Gti. Share your images of your mount and set up along with images captured or experiences observing with it. I've owned mine since May this year and use it with my sw 72ed ds pro, asi air pro, Canon 600D in EQ mode. Even though its mot meant for astrophotography it sure can pull out some brilliant performances. I live in a 1st floor flat and portability is key for me and the goto functionality is a godsend to setup quickly. So feel free to ask anything and other az gti owners can help and advise. 

    • By Peter1984
      Hi Guys,
      So I am losing my mind with this Mount. I am having the same issues. For the life of me I can’t work it out. Here is a pic of how my scope is mounted.  Would really appreciate some help as I am increasingly frustrated with this purchase.  Thank you. 

    • By Catakraken
      Hello. I recently acquired an Ocal electronic collimator for my new 130 PDS and the image I see when I connect it is the one I attach. I can't adjust the green circle in the circle created by the end of the focuser. Not even helping me with the offset of the program, whose maximum is 20. I don't know if anyone has tried this collimator with its 130PDS. But it doesn't seem normal. Any ideas? Thank you.

    • By MHaneferd
      Winter is coming and I struggled the past days with dew on my Skywatcher 120ED. I have tried to use a self made isolation dew-cap around it, but not good enough (still dew)
      I have browsed trough the forum and read about dew heaters vs. Dew shield, and figured out that I probably need a dew heater. The temperature here can range from minus 5 to minus 35 degrees celcius, but I dont think I’ll be using the scope when passing minus 20.
      My question is, which dew heating option would handle minus 10 to minus 20 degrees celcius for my scope? I am afraid that the temperature loss will make the strips not functioning well when passing minus 10 degrees, but I might be wrong?

      I guess my scooe is around 45cm circumference outside the tube.
      I am using 220V with adapters to everything else, so power is not an issue. 
    • By PeterC65
      I’ve always liked star gazing and attended the Introduction to Astronomy course at Norman Lockyer Observatory a few years ago (which I’d recommend). Since a holiday has been off the agenda for the last 18 months, we decided to spend the money instead on a telescope and take a proper look at the night sky. Here is what I’ve learned from the first couple of sessions …
      I chose the Sky-Watcher Skymax 127 SynScan AZ GOTO because:
      I wanted a descent scope with a good aperture, but also something compact (both the OTA and the mount) as it will get lugged about and stored in the back bedroom. I can find a few stars but don’t know the night sky, so I wanted a mount that would point me in the right direction. I could probably align an EQ mount with Polaris, but two star alignment seemed easier and quicker, meaning more observing and less faffing. Before the scope even arrived I had bought a Celestron 6.1Ah Lithium Powertank.
      The Skymax 127 comes with a VERY basic battery pack that takes eight AA cells. The mount consumes up to 12W so will flatten AA batteries quickly, and rechargeable AA batteries only have a terminal voltage of 1.2V so cannot provide the 12V needed by the mount to operate properly. The scope really needs to be powered from a Powertank or a mains power supply I think.
      I chose the Powertank because it’s portable, avoids the trip hazard of mains cabling, and is regulated to maintain the 12V needed by the mount as it discharges. So far a full charge seems to be good for several hours of observing. Surprisingly, there is no power switch on the mount, but I can use the power switch on the Powertank to switch system power rather than just pulling out the power cord!
      The first night of observing was frustrating! The second time, after properly reading the manual and doing some online research, went much better. Here’s what I learned …
      Make sure there is enough play in the power cord for the mount to turn through 360° in either direction. Movement of the mount can pull out the power cord if it is tight which then loses all of the setup and alignment data!
      UPDATE:  To really see an object you need to look at it over several minutes so that you become accustomed to the image and your brain begins to pick out the details. In order to do this comfortably, set the tripod height so that you can observe while sitting in a chair. Set the height so that at high elevations, above 70°, you can lean forward in the chair and still comfortably look into the eyepiece. At low elevations, below 30°, I cant over the diagonal so that the eyepiece is near horizontal then observe from the side of the scope.
      Make sure the mount is exactly horizontal so that movement of the OTA in azimuth through a rotation stays exactly flat. I used a spirit level during daylight to level the tripod top with the mount removed then marked the leg positions on the patio.
      Power up the mount with it set horizontal (using a spirit level) and pointing true north (using a compass) so that it is approximately aligned from the start. At power up the mount assumes it is orientated at 0° altitude and 360° azimuth. This makes it easier to find alignment objects and it stops the mount from slewing in strange ways (ways that cause the power cord to disconnect!).
      When finished, Park the mount to its Home Position so that it returns to horizontal and pointing true north for next time. After parking, you can resume next time using the previous alignment data but if the scope has been moved it’s probably best to start again from scratch.
      The mount has no real time clock (!) so the date (in month / day / year format) and the time must be entered every time it’s powers up. The mount does remember its location so this just needs to be confirmed at power up unless it has changed.
      I align the mount using the 2-Star Alignment method, choosing two stars that are in the same area of sky where I plan to observe. Only certain stars can be used for alignment, there are around 90 to choose from, and it’s worth deciding which to use before you start observing. I’ve set the Sort order for Alignment Stars to Alphabetic (this is remembered by the mount) rather than by magnitude, as it makes the selected stars easier to find.
      There are course and fine stages when aligning to each of the two stars. During the course stage the slew rate is automatically set to fast. For the first star slewing has to be done manually, but for the second star the mount will slew automatically to the approximate position of the star (since the mount now has some alignment data).
      During the fine stage the slew rate is automatically set to slow. You must finalise the alignment of the chosen stars in the centre of the field of view using the Up and Right arrow keys as this compensates for backlash in the mount (when automatically slewing to objects, the mount first slews fast to just left and underneath the chosen object and then approaches the object slewing slowly to the right and upwards).
      Make sure Tracking is switched on and set to Sidereal for stars and planets and to Lunar for the moon (when using the Object List location function the appropriate tracking mode is set automatically). If an object’s position within the field of view isn’t quite central, it can be tweaked by manually slewing (at a slow slew rate), then the tracking function will keep the object centred.
      If you think you might return to an object later, it’s worth using Pointing Accuracy Enhancement (PAE) to store tweaks to object positions. PAEs are applied to any objects located within about 5° of the object that was tweaked.
      I find Show Position useful when manually locating objects to check the current altitude and azimuth positions, and Identify useful to check what objects I might be looking at!
      One nice surprise is that the SynScan controller that arrived has a USB type B connector in place of the advertised 12V power connector. This enables a wired USB connection to a PC which allows the mount to be controlled by programs such as Stellarium (I’ve tested this and it connects with no effort and works fine).
      UPDATE:  The SynScan controller does a good job of locating objects, but with two lines of display text it can provide only limited information about the objects you observe. Having used the controller to setup and align the scope, I then use Stellarium to control its position and locate the objects I want to observe. Stellarium shows each object in context, provides easy access to magnitude, size and other data, and shows what you might expect to see (more realistically with background DSO images turned off!). I’ve setup the Stellarium Oculars plug-in to show the view through the main scope with different eyepiece and Barlow combinations, and also to show the view through the finderscope. Using the finderscope ocular, I can check what I’m actually seeing in the finderscope to make sure I’m pointing at the right thing, then using the main scope ocular, I can check what I’m meant to be looking for through the scope.
      So far I’ve been a little underwhelmed by what I’ve been able to observe! I have a cheap and cheerful 45x field scope which gives a good view of the moon and can just about pick out the rings of Saturn and the moons of Jupiter. With the Skymax 127 the moon is much clearer and I can see details of craters when they are in shadow. Saturn and Jupiter look a little better but I can’t see much more detail and at higher magnification (10mm EP) they are a little fuzzy. I managed to find Andromeda (or rather the mount did!) but it looked like piece of cotton wool and didn’t fill the field of view as I had been expecting. When I looked at nebulae I could see the concentration of stars forming them but had no sense of any colour or clouds.
      Is this par for the course, or am I missing something?
      So far I’m using the scope as it arrived, out of the box (apart from the Powertank), but I do have on order a few ‘upgrades’ …
      Baader Hyperion Zoom Eyepiece – to replace the basic eyepieces that come with the telescope (25mm and 10mm) and to provide a range of magnifications. Baader Prism Star-Diagonal – to replace the basic diagonal that comes with the telescope and to provide a stronger mechanical support for the (rather expensive) Zoom eyepiece. Baader Helical Focuser – the focus control on the back of the Skymax 127 seems very sensitive and I see from another post that this helical focuser can fix this. Baader Neodymium Moon and Skyglow Filter – OK, I was getting a little carried away by this point! – where I live is quite rural but this filter seems to improve matters over and above just removing light pollution. When these bits have arrived and I’ve had a chance to try them I will post again with an update.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.