Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_inspirational_skies.thumb.jpg.a20cdbfeadc049807f6d78e6c00ee900.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Having just started out with my telescope (and still awaiting some decent clear skies for a decent play!), I wanted to find a sensible dust cover, come protective rain/shower cover, for storage inside while not being used, and as an emergency cover-up when outside. In particular, I wanted a suitable dust cover for indoors.

I found all the usual expensive options, plus a lot of recommendations, but none for me seemed to fit the bill, though I am sure there are others out there. However, being a boaty kind of person, I have used over the past few years the "Ducksback" outboard engine covers during winter storage. These, as it happens, are the ideal thing, and after checking out the sizes, the Size 5 80 to 150HP outboard engine size cover is just perfect for a Skywatcher Skyhawk 500mm 1145P! And it costs just £11.80!

Here are the details if it helps anyone else...

To quote, they are "waterproof, UV resistant, breathable,300 denier 6oz polyester material, drawstring closure with toggle fastening for easy fit". They come in a range of sizes, and without wishing to be seen as advertising them, I don't think they have cottoned on to these covers being great for telescopes yet! The full range (in either silver or blue), covers dimensions for all sizes 1 to 7 (length 90cm x width 60cm x height 80cm). They are floppy and easily accommodate strange telescope shapes. You can check them out or buy at:

https://ducksback.co.uk/?product=outboard-engine-cowl-cover-silver

Or buy easily on eBay as I did.

Hope helps,
Clive

telescope-cover-ducksback.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that a canvas garden chair cover worked a treat for covering my Losmandy G8 and G11. The electronics never got wet! I tied the cover around the pier with a cord and it lasted for year after year. £8.50 from my local garden centre! :icon_biggrin:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clive,

I spent a while looking for a cover for my ED80 that wouldn't break the bank and settled on a simple bicycle cover that I found on Ebay for about £2. It did the job perfectly well while at SGL last year (too soon the say that for 2017?....) although was very flimsy and easy to damage. The outboard motor cover looks like a very good idea, and I will look at them myself, proves we don't need to break the bank to protect our scopes :D cheers.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, you do not need to break the bank for a cover, but a good cover does cost. A little warning is in place here, though: The thin covers you are talking about do not prevent rapid temperature changes under the cover. Those rapid changes promote dew forming under the cover very easily and damage the mount and it's electronics in a sneaky way.
The best covers that can withstand all conditions are not really cheap and even they need a little inside heating to prevent damage in the long run.

http://www.astrogizmos.com/Cover.htm and http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_t365.htm

A pair of skibootheaters under the cover keeps the inside temperature above dewpoint for protection against getting wet.
re-usable desiccant packs work too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a chimnea cover for mine I think the brand is Oxford.  Mind you I don't store mine outside, but I think the cover would sport a few days use outside if I needed it to.  The outboard covers look lovely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another really useful source of covers!  thanks for the heads-up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By rorymultistorey
      Zero budget astrophotography...
      I thought it may be interesting for people wanting a super lightweight and easy to set up form of astrophotography that costs next to nothing. I've taken these three shots with my mobile phone through a pair of cheap binoculars using an ordinary tripod (it belonged to my wife's grandfather). 

       
      The intergration time for each was only a few minutes. 
      Orion: 157 x 1 sec
      Andromeda 300 x 2 sec
      7 sisters 120 x 2sec
      I've made a VIDEO of the method and the surprising adventure I had taking them which you can watch here: 
       
       
       
    • By Stu
      The peak of the Lyrid Meteor Shower. Some meteors expected to be visible between 19th and 25th April.
      The Moon will be at First Quarter so will interfere in early evening. ZHR of around 10 from a dark site with the peak at 4am.
    • By Martin Perrett
      Hi all,
      After having my mind programmed into thinking that home observatories should be round or square I saw an article showing a triangular one. This altered my thinking completely. I had some plywood and other wood left from building my house so took a couple of days to build my observatory. The size was dictated by the tripod base and the movement of the telescope on the mount. I have a NEQ6 Pro and 8inch ACF. The first thing is to align the tripod along the meridian North South with the help of the sun's shadow and the time. This means that with the scope parked it takes up less room. The roof hinges over with the help of a counterweight (not shown on my first video) and the base of the observatory is a equalateral triangle about 5-5 feet high to allow the scope to see most of the sky. This setup allows for access to the scope but is really for remote viewing. The triangular base is approx. 6 feet on each side but the roof requires room on one side to be hinged over. The observatory can be built from 4 sheets of 18mm exterior grade ply and one sheet of 5mm marine ply for the roof and 3 4.2mtr length of 50mm by 100mm treated wood. The cost could be less than £200 if you can use some reclaimed bits. The video I made is about 20 minutes long and involved me thinking and working things out while building it. The triangular construction is much easier and stronger than a square or circular one. The design means I have the scope setup and ready for those short glimpses of clear sky while also able to try remote control of the scope with the roof closed. Since the first video I have put more hinges on the joint and a beam (made from hardwood I bought as an off cut) with a couple of old rail track plates used as counterweights. The next thing is to use a garage door opener to remote the opening of the roof. 
      So here is the link to the video. Please just see it as an example of what you can do, not as a 'this is the way to do it' video. If I was building it again it would be similar but better.
       
    • By wookie1965
      I was looking for an eyepiece bag and they are quite expensive so went down this route.
      Camera bag £6 from ebay and jumbo sponges 3 for a quid and made this what do you think. 



    • By Some Dude With A Mak- Cass
      found a $40 refractor at a goodwill today. will include some pictures, is it worth the money? has a EQ mount included, and for just 40 I'm seriously considering it. tips? it has no eyepeices included, but the mount looks sturdy and the i don't yet have a refractor so i really want it.. if its worth it. pretty sure its worth over $200 but idk 4 sure. 
       
      remember that i know so little about refractors that i had to google how they worked.. again. but that mount alone would be worth it, even if the optical tube isn't. please feel free to tell me its not worth it, i don NOT want to waste money on this.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.