Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

What did the postman bring?


nightfisher

Recommended Posts

Well, the good post person visited today and delivered a new family member, brand new and boxed.
Nice and far lighter than I expected although I had the specification and read 25585's write up about his version.
This is the second 2" eyepiece I have ever owned, had the 28mm Sky-Watcher with my ED100, thought that was big,
but no this is a little bigger and very nice build quality.
I even like the eye lens cover (cup) 25585!

IMG_3139.thumb.JPG.c39b4d19a3ba0b12296df859eb419447.JPG

Here it is with the rest of the family,
some further additions may be added as funds and availability allows.

IMG_3140.thumb.JPG.a6f3e1c2b4daa92c96899e0536c44ca6.JPG
 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Alan White said:

Well, the good post person visited today and delivered a new family member, brand new and boxed.
Nice and far lighter than I expected although I had the specification and read 25585's write up about his version.
This is the second 2" eyepiece I have ever owned, had the 28mm Sky-Watcher with my ED100, thought that was big,
but no this is a little bigger and very nice build quality.
I even like the eye lens cover (cup) 25585!

IMG_3139.thumb.JPG.c39b4d19a3ba0b12296df859eb419447.JPG

Here it is with the rest of the family,
some further additions may be added as funds and availability allows.

IMG_3140.thumb.JPG.a6f3e1c2b4daa92c96899e0536c44ca6.JPG
 

That is turning into a very nice family Alan! Congratulations?

Dave

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alan White said:

Well, the good post person visited today and delivered a new family member, brand new and boxed.
Nice and far lighter than I expected although I had the specification and read 25585's write up about his version.
This is the second 2" eyepiece I have ever owned, had the 28mm Sky-Watcher with my ED100, thought that was big,
but no this is a little bigger and very nice build quality.
I even like the eye lens cover (cup) 25585!

IMG_3139.thumb.JPG.c39b4d19a3ba0b12296df859eb419447.JPG

Here it is with the rest of the family,
some further additions may be added as funds and availability allows.

IMG_3140.thumb.JPG.a6f3e1c2b4daa92c96899e0536c44ca6.JPG
 

Very pleased for you Alan :) :headbang:

Now there is that 42mm FLO is selling, but a bit more expensive. 17mm is a good one, to seek out & buy next. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alan White said:

Well, the good post person visited today and delivered a new family member, brand new and boxed.
Nice and far lighter than I expected although I had the specification and read 25585's write up about his version.
This is the second 2" eyepiece I have ever owned, had the 28mm Sky-Watcher with my ED100, thought that was big,
but no this is a little bigger and very nice build quality.
I even like the eye lens cover (cup) 25585!

IMG_3139.thumb.JPG.c39b4d19a3ba0b12296df859eb419447.JPG

Here it is with the rest of the family,
some further additions may be added as funds and availability allows.

IMG_3140.thumb.JPG.a6f3e1c2b4daa92c96899e0536c44ca6.JPG
 

Hard to beat Vixen lanthanum glass, nice collection!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Alan White said:

Well, the good post person visited today and delivered a new family member, brand new and boxed.
Nice and far lighter than I expected although I had the specification and read 25585's write up about his version.
This is the second 2" eyepiece I have ever owned, had the 28mm Sky-Watcher with my ED100, thought that was big,
but no this is a little bigger and very nice build quality.
I even like the eye lens cover (cup) 25585!

IMG_3139.thumb.JPG.c39b4d19a3ba0b12296df859eb419447.JPG

Here it is with the rest of the family,
some further additions may be added as funds and availability allows.

IMG_3140.thumb.JPG.a6f3e1c2b4daa92c96899e0536c44ca6.JPG
 

I'm not drooling. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just delivered a LensCoat Hoodie Lens Cap (XX Large) - Black. This is to use on my Tak FS102 when I need to cover it during an observing run. The standard Tak "manhole" cover is wonderful, but it's a bit heavy, so upsets the balance. The LensCoat weighs almost nothing. And is so much nicer looking than the Telegizmos cover I have been using, which is a really tacky, if not downright ugly, piece of kit.

IMG_8938.JPG.8c0c815871146ccf4088eb4d67a7d6f5.JPG

IMG_8939.JPG

IMG_8940.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JeremyS said:

Just delivered a LensCoat Hoodie Lens Cap (XX Large) - Black. This is to use on my Tak FS102 when I need to cover it during an observing run. The standard Tak "manhole" cover is wonderful, but it's a bit heavy, so upsets the balance. The LensCoat weighs almost nothing. And is so much nicer looking than the Telegizmos cover I have been using, which is a really tacky, if not downright ugly, piece of kit.

IMG_8938.JPG.8c0c815871146ccf4088eb4d67a7d6f5.JPG

IMG_8939.JPG

IMG_8940.JPG

Hmm. I like the TG cover for its greater depth. Also would be extra protection for the whole hood when carrying. Where can you buy one, as my FC would appreciate it ☺?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 25585 said:

Hmm. I like the TG cover for its greater depth. Also would be extra protection for the whole hood when carrying. Where can you buy one, as my FC would appreciate it ☺?

I am not completely dismissing the Telegizmos hood - it has the advantage of being waterproof and longer. It's just that it's aesthetically challenged. Also the draw string doesn't really hold it tight, so there is a chance it could come off. I bought it from FLO.

I bought the LensCoat Hoodie from Wex.

You mentioned extra protection when carrying. I think the LensCoat would afford more protection from a bump and the material is thicker and there is a nice semi-rigid insert made from some high density foam plastic (which is removable) at the base, which would give bump protection to the end of the Tak's dew cap. However, knowing your keenness not to take chances when protecting your telescopes, you could always use both :happy7:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JeremyS said:

I am not completely dismissing the Telegizmos hood - it has the advantage of being waterproof and longer. It's just that it's aesthetically challenged. Also the draw string doesn't really hold it tight, so there is a chance it could come off. I bought it from FLO.

I bought the LensCoat Hoodie from Wex.

You mentioned extra protection when carrying. I think the LensCoat would afford more protection from a bump and the material is thicker and there is a nice semi-rigid insert made from some high density foam plastic (which is removable) at the base, which would give bump protection to the end of the Tak's dew cap. However, knowing your keenness not to take chances when protecting your telescopes, you could always use both :happy7:

I confess that I do love my FS128s Manhole Cover..and such a snug fit!??

Dave

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, F15Rules said:

I confess that I do love my FS128s Manhole Cover..and such a snug fit!??

Dave

I love mine too, Dave (especially in Tak green). Shall we start a "Show us your Tak Manhole Cover" thread? ?

Meanwhile this is specially for you, Dave:

 

IMG_8947.JPG

Edited by JeremyS
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, parallaxerr said:

WARNING - THIS POST DOES NOT CONTAIN TAKAHASHI

Filling in the gaps in my ES line-up of EP's :)

82° 4.7mm, 68° 24mm & 62° 32mm

20180522_155541.thumb.jpg.fa340f10c7332963660dc8d6f6d85f8c.jpg

Nice. It would be good to hear what you make of the 62° line once you've had a chance to test them. I don't think we've had many (any?) reports so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, parallaxerr said:

WARNING - THIS POST DOES NOT CONTAIN TAKAHASHI

Filling in the gaps in my ES line-up of EP's :)

82° 4.7mm, 68° 24mm & 62° 32mm

20180522_155541.thumb.jpg.fa340f10c7332963660dc8d6f6d85f8c.jpg

?How are you supposed to be able to see through the lens with the logo on them. 

Edited by LukeSkywatcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricochet said:

Nice. It would be good to hear what you make of the 62° line once you've had a chance to test them. I don't think we've had many (any?) reports so far. 

I will report on the 62°. Searched high and low for reviews but like you say, none around. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, parallaxerr said:

WARNING - THIS POST DOES NOT CONTAIN TAKAHASHI

Filling in the gaps in my ES line-up of EP's :)

82° 4.7mm, 68° 24mm & 62° 32mm

20180522_155541.thumb.jpg.fa340f10c7332963660dc8d6f6d85f8c.jpg

Very nice. Good to complete sets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.