Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep8_banner.thumb.jpg.7fc4114c7705b14c0786cf342cea1f9c.jpg

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Rodd said:

Now that you mention this I took a closer look at the background and see what you mean.  Its always something.  Your processing skills have almost eliminated the pattern.  

Rodd

It is getting there.  I will try again with just proper dithering and see what I get.  Although I suspect I may need to go back to using darks to get rid of the small amount of amp glow.

My suspicion is that the D7500 does not have any more amp glow than my old D5300 but because the D7500 has overall a great deal less noise, the amp glow is more noticeable.  A few more experiments should tell the tale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, toxic said:

thats a cracker Mike :thumbright:

Thanks Chris.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

Lovely image - almost as much detail in your tags too :icon_biggrin:

:)

Pathetic, I know but I like it when the search engines can find my images :icon_redface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MikeODay said:

:)

Pathetic, I know but I like it when the search engines can find my images :icon_redface:

You'll fine a shorter list of more precise tags, three to five, will rank a lot higher in search results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike,

I had a go at the background with a new plug in filter I just bought for PS called Neat Image. It did quite a good job ( I used layer masks and the brush to protect the galaxy). Here it is before and after:

Cheers

Göran

MikeOdayNGC1365.jpeg

MikeOdayNGC1365 GN.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

You'll fine a shorter list of more precise tags, three to five, will rank a lot higher in search results.

Cheers Neil

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, gorann said:

Mike,

I had a go at the background with a new plug in filter I just bought for PS called Neat Image. It did quite a good job ( I used layer masks and the brush to protect the galaxy). Here it is before and after:

Cheers

Göran

 

 

Thanks Goran for going to that effort; it seems to work very well, I will keep it in mind if I can’t get rid of the pattern at the source.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MikeODay said:

Thanks Goran for going to that effort; it seems to work very well, I will keep it in mind if I can’t get rid of the pattern at the source.

Cheers

Mike

Yes, going for the source if of course the best. I have had similar patterns in some of my DSLR images and I have wondered if it could be the shutter that makes the set-up shake a tiny bit and the image to shift very slightly between frames creating that banded noise after stacking. Like a natural dithering but unfortunately only in one direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, gorann said:

Yes, going for the source if of course the best. I have had similar patterns in some of my DSLR images and I have wondered if it could be the shutter that makes the set-up shake a tiny bit and the image to shift very slightly between frames creating that banded noise after stacking. Like a natural dithering but unfortunately only in one direction.

That sort of diagonal 'brushed' pattern often gets called 'walking noise' but I have it very clearly in some data from guided subs where all the subs are perfectly aligned on the sensor so it can't be 'walking noise'. I am now convinced it is caused by high, thin cloud or haze and the direction of the texture matches the drift of the cloud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, gorann said:

Yes, going for the source if of course the best. I have had similar patterns in some of my DSLR images and I have wondered if it could be the shutter that makes the set-up shake a tiny bit and the image to shift very slightly between frames creating that banded noise after stacking. Like a natural dithering but unfortunately only in one direction.

In my case I know why I have streaks ...

A single image ( dark or light ) shows no signs of pattern in the noise.  However, when I stack a number of dark images the very low level of pattern noise ( including amp glow on the left ) starts to be seen.  Overall the noise is quite low, and the pattern noise even lower, but when I stacked 70 lights to get the image above and then performed a very strong stretch to bring up the faint arms, the amp glow and pattern noise became quite visible.  The reason there are streaks from the pattern noise is that I messed up dithering; in effect I was dithering in an almost constant shift in one direction rather than the random pattern I had intended.  Dithering will be the easiest part to fix and I am keen to see if doing so will be enough to minimise the pattern noise in the main part of the image.  I will have to try harder with the amp glow; I want to avoid darks if I can because of the additional noise they introduce, so my first plan is to double check that I have turned off every function in the camera that might be drawing current during capture.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

That sort of diagonal 'brushed' pattern often gets called 'walking noise' but I have it very clearly in some data from guided subs where all the subs are perfectly aligned on the sensor so it can't be 'walking noise'. I am now convinced it is caused by high, thin cloud or haze and the direction of the texture matches the drift of the cloud.

You may well be right about the cloud and in my case it may have also contributed ( albeit that I don’t think it was the primary cause ).  I will know more when I get a chance to get back out and take some more shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MikeODay said:

You may well be right about the cloud and in my case it may have also contributed ( albeit that I don’t think it was the primary cause ).  I will know more when I get a chance to get back out and take some more shots.

It's possible/probable that some of these effects have multiple causes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very very good image, that type of noise (whatever the cause) is normally dealt with by a larger scale dither to your subs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Adam J said:

Very very good image, that type of noise (whatever the cause) is normally dealt with by a larger scale dither to your subs. 

Thanks Adam.  I will try increasing the dither size next time.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In his book of observations from the Cape of Good Hope, Sir John Herschel included a number of sketches of the more interesting objects.  The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ), as it known now, was recorded by Herschel as # 2552 in his book and below is the sketch made from his observations of this “nebula” in late November of 1837:

9E71A38A-184C-4D01-A474-7A7E439EBBEE.thumb.jpeg.744dfaf12276d4663201b49ee2638ec2.jpeg

“The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 )” as shown in figure #1, plate iv, from Sir John Herschel’s book of observations from the Cape of Good Hope.  From Observations on the 28/29 November 1837 made with his 20’ focal length Newtonian reflector.

c.f.

C0C5B60D-3E4B-4402-BC0A-C202DE096810.jpeg.60dfc5fe50db0ca5bc9a17192846d22f.jpeg

Edited by MikeODay
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Allinthehead said:

That's a great image Mike.

Thanks, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A great picture, I love the detail you’ve got inside the galaxy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a fantastic amount of detail!!! Well done, it's a master piece... definitely a great barred spiral galaxy pic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/12/2017 at 22:07, kirkster501 said:

A great picture, I love the detail you’ve got inside the galaxy.

 

On 11/12/2017 at 23:52, MarsG76 said:

What a fantastic amount of detail!!! Well done, it's a master piece... definitely a great barred spiral galaxy pic.

Thanks guys, much appreciated.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ) in the constellation Fornax

New version with new long exposure data ( 52 x 240sec ) and better dark subtraction / dithering to remove streaks in the noise and amp glow.  This also allowed for a greater stretch revealing more faint data in the galaxy and small faint fuzzies in the image ..

7F1F55D3-C8E6-44EA-B071-9E90EAA9A934.thumb.jpeg.f079ef12e386988d368c3c1c2bb97074.jpeg

The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ) in the constellation Fornax ( please click / tap image to see larger )

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image. The added data made a huge improvement of what already was a great image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, wimvb said:

Excellent image. The added data made a huge improvement of what already was a great image.

Thanks Wim, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/12/2017 at 19:34, MikeODay said:

The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ) in the constellation Fornax

New version with new long exposure data ( 52 x 240sec ) and better dark subtraction / dithering to remove streaks in the noise and amp glow.  This also allowed for a greater stretch revealing more faint data in the galaxy and small faint fuzzies in the image ..

 

The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ) in the constellation Fornax ( please click / tap image to see larger )

100% crop of new version:

ED66B08E-C020-492C-A2B1-A69A6EAA2989.thumb.jpeg.caa902c74343985a797368d7649c74f4.jpeg

The Great Barred Spiral Galaxy ( NGC 1365 ) 100% crop ( please click / tap image to see larger )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely shot Mike.

This is one of my favourite galaxies. Shame its to far South for us here in Europe.

Tom

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By GavinC
      I thought the recent email exchange between Skywatcher support and myself might be of interest, as there appears little information available on this feature.
      ===========================================
      Hi Gavin,
      Regarding "Alignment Sharing", please see the description below.
      ## Alignment Sharing
      Alignment data is stored in each individual app instance. This means if you performed alignment using one app instance, only it will have the newly created alignment data. If another app instance connects to the same mount, it will not have access to the new alignment data.
      The alignment sharing feature (**Utility > Alignment Sharing**) allows one app instance to send a copy of alignment data to another app instance. For it to work, the devices running the app instances must be on the same local area network (eg connect to the same Wi-Fi network). The sending instance turns on **Share my alignment**, while the receiving instance turns off this option. The receiving instance should then see the shared alignment data appear in a list. Loading alignment data overwrites the previous alignment data.

      You can use the Alignment Sharing to transfer the alignment data to another device after completing a Star Alignment. For example, you have done and successfully complete 2-Star alignment with your smartphone and then you can use the Alignment Sharing function to share the alignment data to the SynScan Pro App Windows program which is running on your PC. Then you don't have to do the alignment again to control the same AZ GOTO mount with the Windows SynScan App because it has the same alignment result as your smartphone has.
      If you have any questions, please feel free to let us know.
      Thank you.
      SynScan App Team

      On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:22 AM Gavin Cox wrote:
      Hello,
      I have just seen you have updated the Synscan app firmware to 1.19.  I have this installed on a Win PC and Android phone and use it to control a AZ GOTO mount running the latest firmware using the Synscan Wifi Dongle.
      There looks to be some new functionality under the utility menu called 'alignment sharing', but I can't find any documentation in the help files on this?
      Please can you detail how it can be used?  If both my phone and PC are connected to the SynScan WiFi hotspot and I perform an alignment on my phone will the app on the PC recognise this too (or vice versa)?
      Thank you,
      Gavin
    • By Armaan Sandhu
      I have been trying to see Jupiter for a while now, but all I am seeing is a whitish blob with a tinge of yellow and blue at the ends. 
      I have tried several filters, but to no avail. 
      I am using an Astromaster 130eq, Celestron with magnifications ranging from 20mm to a 6mm plus a 2X Barlow lens. 
      many suggestions would be greatly appreciated. 
      regards, Armaan. 
       

    • By Batesy82
      Hi guys,
      I've literally just signed up so I'm totally new here and excited to learn from all you professional astromaster... 
      I'm not sure if this is the right place to post so I do apologise if not... 
      I'm after a skywatcher eq3 pro goto mount for my celestron astromaster 130eq every website i go on they are out of stock and not available for a couple of months 🙄 does anybody know a stockist that has these in stock? I've only been in the astrophotography hobby 4 weeks so I've got lots to learn... 
       
      Thank you for your help 
    • By astrosathya
      Friends, I am back with a tutorial video on how to modify your Sky Watcher HEQ5-PRO mount or its American twin, the Orion Sirius EQ-G into a belt driven mount.
      The benefits of converting to a belt drive is that you don't have to worry about Backlash. The procedure took me about an hour to complete.
      Link is below
      https://youtu.be/PjDZiXaN5KM
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.