Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.13b743f39f721323cb5d76f07724c489.jpg

Galactic Wanderer

DSS again not stacking well

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

This isn't the first time I've had this problem. I have about 50 of these and then I get that. I'm assuming it could be to do with alignment or poor data but I have had decent results with similar photos so I am clueless.

IMG_9839.JPG

Autosave001.tif

Edited by Galactic Wanderer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On opening the image larger I don't think DSS will like the star shapes it looks like the tracking moved maybe it was windy.

image.png.e0dbadd68cc5af1efd26f1af736d45ed.png

How long were the exposures?

Edited by happy-kat
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The star shape is probably the issue why DSS won't stack it, but DSS might still accept it if you adjust the threshold for star detection. Chech the "reduce the noise ..." box and adjust the slider until it finds at least a few stars.
Personally i aim for at least 10-12, but preferably aim for ~30-60 in images with few stars, and ~100-300 in wider images with loads of stars.
When sliding it towards the minimum, i think 2%, you might (especially if the noise reduction is not checked) find that it suddenly detects thousands of stars, if this happens, you need to back off a bit, as it's not detecting stars anymore, but noise. 

image.png.aa819c3563251500a3ca8b404cb73b5e.png

If all this fails, you might still be able to somehow save the data by resizing the images. I would suggest resizing the raw files and save them as uncompressed TIF files.
Try with 50% reduction to begin with, and retry the stacking. DSS will most likely then accept the stars. This will naturally result in lower resolution, but you might not really suffer too much from it as the tracking is already too far off.
 I remember i had to do this myself a couple of times both before i was guiding, and when it was very windy. 

Looking at the star shape i don't think your alignment is very off for a 120 sec exposure, but judging by the sharp 90 degree angle it might be that your balance in both axes is simply too good. If you have perfect balance in both axes you might problems with backlash from even the lightest wind. If your balance is rear perfect, try to ever so slightly make it off balance. This way the gears constantly have something to push against and might result in better tracking. 

Was this with or without guiding? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.