Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Recommended Posts

Spiral Galaxy NGC 6744 in Pavo

NGC 6744 is a Milky Way like barred spiral galaxy in the constellation Pavo.  Visible only from lower latitudes, the light we see now left this galaxy around 25 million years ago. 

554CC5C5-67D9-4D25-A093-9F10D39C9E5A.thumb.jpeg.8eda5b710d2028e8452629ff6ceb1898.jpeg

NGC 6744 in Pavo ( please click / tap on image to see larger and sharper )

 

Capture Details:

North is up.

Telescope: 
Orion Optics CT12 Newtonian ( mirror 300mm, fl 1200mm, f4 ).
Corrector: ASA 2" Coma Corrector Quattro 1.175x.
Effective Focal Length / Aperture : 1400mm f4.7.

Mount: 
Skywatcher EQ8.
Guiding: TSOAG9 Off-Axis-Guider, 
Starlight Xpress Lodestar X2, 
PHD2 .

Camera:
Nikon D5300 (unmodified) 
(sensor 23.5 x 15.6mm, 6016x4016 3.9um pixels).

Location:
Blue Mountains, Australia 
Moderate light pollution 
( pale green zone on darksitefinder.com map ).

Capture ( 16, 17, 19 Sept. 2017 ).
9 sets of sub-images with exposure duration for each set doubling ( 1s to 240s ) all at ISO800.
85 x 240s + 5 each @ 1s to 120s.

Processing ( Pixinsight - 5-17 Nov 2017  ).
Calibration: master bias, master flat and no darks.
Integration in 9 sets.
HDR combination 
PhotometricColorCalibration
Arcsinh stretch ( function written by Mark Shelley )

Image Plate Solver - NGC 6744 - Sept 17, 2017
===================================
Resolution ........ 0.586 arcsec/px ( full size image )
Rotation ............ 0.001 deg.
Focal ................. 1372.24 mm.
Pixel size ........ ..3.90 um.
Field of view ..... 58' 30.3" x 38' 59.0".
Image center ...... RA: 19 09 46.591  Dec: -63 51 13.44
==================================

        

  • Like 17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new Pixinsight Arcsinh stretch function ( written by Mark Shelley ) was used to stretch the HDR linear image whilst keeping colour in the stars.  Thanks Mark :icon_salut:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Victor Boesen said:

Beautiful image!!!

 

12 hours ago, cfpendock said:

Very nice image.  Sadly this one is not available here....

Chrid

 

6 hours ago, joelshort said:

Very nice!  I really like the new ArcsinStretch too.  It works really well on RGB data.

Thanks guys, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, not one I am familiar with. What’s the benefit of the range of 1s exposures from 1-120s?

Thanks

Adam. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

Very nice, not one I am familiar with. What’s the benefit of the range of 1s exposures from 1-120s?

Thanks

Adam. 

Thanks Adam - NGC 6744 is way down here in the South and is a little compensation for the wonderful objects you have up there in the chilly North :)

The range of exposures is based on my HDR capture and processing workflow...

The shortest exposure is chosen based on the brightest star in the frame; that is, the longest exposure such that the pixel value of the centre of the brightest star < 16383 ( the 14bit maximum ).

Then I use a range of exposures ( doubling every time ) so as to smooth out the tones in the HDR image of the bright stars.  Previously, with an HDR image based on sets of exposures every 2 or 3 stops, the brightest stars had an “onion” like appearance with rings of differing exposure values.  Having said that, my processing workflow has changed quite a bit since then ( in particular I now use Pixelmath instead of the build in HDR module in Pixinsight ) and it may be worth checking to see if I can get away with a bigger step size than the 1 stop I am using now.

Cheers

Mike

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fascinating Mike. Thanks for the detailed explanation.  It certainly works well!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MikeODay said:

A deeper look ...

FAA8F6C1-BFB1-4F00-826F-E75E09311D62.thumb.jpeg.4cf8d389e88f01a6a3f2ceedc3f6d916.jpeg

NGC 6744 in Pavo ( negative )

I like that tidal stream coming from the main galaxy. Reminds me of Gabany's work. Do you have any plans of enhancing that in the colour image?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, wimvb said:

I like that tidal stream coming from the main galaxy. Reminds me of Gabany's work. Do you have any plans of enhancing that in the colour image?

I will have to have another look at it - the challenge is the noise; even desaturated it looks pretty bad in the highly stretched colour image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/11/2017 at 10:01, Allinthehead said:

Very Nice Mike.

 

On 20/11/2017 at 10:09, toxic said:

thats a very nice image Mike :thumbright:

Thanks Guys, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By markastro
      Hi,
       
          Looking for a 12" DOB (or larger) which can be transported to Prestwick, Ayrshire. Any brand, as long as the telescope is optically sound and in good working order. I'm a reliable buyer who has bought and sold on this site before.
       
      Thanks,
       
      Mark
    • By rorymultistorey
      So I picked up a classic... a 1970's - 80's edmund optics f6 150mm newtonian...

      ... like this one but mine has a different mount. It was cheap. Very good condition. The focuser is pants. The mechanics of the secondary holder is (IMHO) brilliant and apparently the primary is 1/10th wave.
      But its f6 and I trhink I'd rather swap it out for a faster synta f5 mirror. .  The thing is its a one shot job bc to make the f5 mirror work I will have to saw off a good few cm from the barrel of the scope.
      So the question is: Is a high quality f6 mirror better than a faster synta f5 mirror for wide deep space astrophotograhy?
       
      All comments gratefully received. 😉 
    • By Asghar
      Hi all,
       
      I'm pretty new to astronomy and need help deciding if I should buy the following telescope or not, mainly if there is anything visibly missing by looking at the photos?
       
      Thanks in advance!



    • By AstroRuz
      Skywatcher 150/1200 f8 planetary Newtonian.
      Bought this originally intending to set up a planetary rig but circumstances call for sale.
      Will come with eyepieces and a collimation eyepiece. Not used by myself and has seen very little use. Mirrors in good condition
      Collection only
      £50



    • By masjstovel
      Hi,
      I bought my first telescope, SW 150pds about 6 months ago with the purpose of astroimaging "when i feel ready".  So far ive used my Nikon D810 for that, and I'm now  planning on taking the step buying my first AP camera.
      My targets would be DSO's, and not planetary. I want a mono-camera, not color. 

      I want to get away with a very good camera to a reasonable price (wouldn't we all...) and in this regard I've been drooling on the ZWO ASI 1600MM Mono for some time. The price for it is in the upper part of my budget, but I'm willing to if its worth it.  I've seen from other treads that sensor-size isn't everything, and dynamic range and gain and all is just as important, but i have trouble understanding it all 100% when it's all new to me, but in my experience i am a practical person who learns things much better and faster with the gear in my hand. So without getting to technical, and staying as objective as possible - please help me with; 

      1. Is this a good camera to go for?
      2. It's sold with options of filters 1.25", 31mm or 36mm - Why these options, and what determines what i would choose?

      3. Would you go for another camera in this price range, and why? - Or to rephrase it a bit; If you were in my shoes, which camera would you og for?

      I'd appreciate any help:)

      I might add, that i understand that with my lack of experience, buying a mono-camera with filters and all might seem premature, but for some strange reason. I enjoy these "way over my head"-projects and figuring  out things as time goes - I just need some guiding in the right direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.