Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

coatesg

99% illuminated moon mosaic in 18 frames

Recommended Posts

I took this image on the 4th Nov over the space of about half an hour from 2215UT. This mosaic is made from 18 frames, each of them is 3000 frames, with the best 12% stacked within Autostakkert2. Total data size was 52.6GB - all using an ASI120MM through a 350mm newt at f4.52 with a 742nm nr-IR filter.

Each of the frames was processed identically in Registax6 with Wavelets, etc. and then saved as a fits file. At this point, I took the images into ICE and combined them into one large mosaic, and then post processed in PS (levels, slight smart sharpening, curves and background levels). I did also try using photomerge in PS CS4, but interestingly, ICE did a better job (marginal, but there were a couple of edge artifacts with photomerge). 

Beware for those on slow connections: the full size file is quite big at 7.3MB, even as a jpg...thanks for looking!

Moon_ice_stitch_proc.thumb.jpg.499ed08dd912c7c67b38279a7349a010.jpg

Edited by coatesg
  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice panorama! (As perhaps some of you have noticed, I especially like moon panoramas. :smiley:) This one shows much detail and covers the North Pole region very well.

My first thought was: How is it possible that you covered the full moon with just 18 frames, using a 14" telescope. But then I realized that the camera was probably at prime focus of the short Newtonian. That makes sense. With my C11, using the same camera, I need at least 60 frames!

I agree that photomerge in PS isn't a good choice. I got the best results with Panorama Studio 3 Professional. But your result with ICE is very good as well. I didn't see any merger artefacts. Very good!

- Rolf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rolf! Yes - a fast-ish Newtonian: less frames, but doesn't make the collimation easy compared to say an SCT! I'm also probably a bit more liable to local air currents (though being a truss, it does cool a bit quicker and doesn't have currents passing up a tube). Mirror needs another clean though...

I'll take a look at the trial version of Panorama Studio - ICE worked well here, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of control over the way the images are stitched - there are a couple of slightly soft areas which would be good to revisit, but I think I perhaps needed a bit more overlap between frames in a couple of places. 

I also need to have a look at your Firecap plugin! Very impressive work and have downloaded it already, but I didn't have a huge amount of time to look at getting it working - next full moon I'll see if I can get the process automated! Cheers!

Edited by coatesg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 07/11/2017 at 00:03, coatesg said:

I took this image on the 4th Nov over the space of about half an hour from 2215UT. This mosaic is made from 18 frames, each of them is 3000 frames, with the best 12% stacked within Autostakkert2. Total data size was 52.6GB - all using an ASI120MM through a 350mm newt at f4.52 with a 742nm nr-IR filter.

A really excellent image, I love being able to scan over the full moon at this level of detail.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, coatesg said:

Thanks Rolf! Yes - a fast-ish Newtonian: less frames, but doesn't make the collimation easy compared to say an SCT! I'm also probably a bit more liable to local air currents (though being a truss, it does cool a bit quicker and doesn't have currents passing up a tube). Mirror needs another clean though...

I'll take a look at the trial version of Panorama Studio - ICE worked well here, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of control over the way the images are stitched - there are a couple of slightly soft areas which would be good to revisit, but I think I perhaps needed a bit more overlap between frames in a couple of places. 

I also need to have a look at your Firecap plugin! Very impressive work and have downloaded it already, but I didn't have a huge amount of time to look at getting it working - next full moon I'll see if I can get the process automated! Cheers!

Hi Graeme,

Newtonians usually give better image quality as compared to SCTs of the same size. They need a stronger mount, though. For my Vixen Sphinx the C11 is, therefore, easier to handle. Otherwise I would love to use a large Newtonian, too. :sad:

Panorama Studio Professional 3 gives you lots of control. For example, you can edit the keypoints which are used to stitch the images together. But even in fully automatic mode it usually works very well. As far as I remember only the "professtional" version supports 16bit, which of course is important.

If you want to experiment with MoonPanoramaMaker, I very much recommend that you first get familiar with the process using the ASCOM telescope simulator and Stellarium. The exact details are described in the "Cloudy Nights" thread. Taking panoramas fully automatically is a complicated process. One should be well prepared when first trying this at the telescope.

All the best,

 Rolf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great image, incredible clarity all over. :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Dave Baxter
      Moon shot directly from my Celestron 8SE, April 6, 2020. ISO 200, 1/320 exposure with my Canon Rebel SL2.
    • By Kitsunegari
      And i will try again.

    • By WiltsStarGazer
      At least some advantages to being furloughed.
      Skywatcher 130/650, 20mm EY, Celestron Smartphone mount, iPhone se.

    • By ngwillym
      UPDATED  ALL SOLD
      I have too many Lunar Atlases, so it is time to say goodbye to some of them.
      All of these book are in very good - excellent condition and have hardly been used. All prices are postage paid to the UK. Payment by Paypal please - details on request
      1) Atlas of the Moon - Antonin Rukl 1996 published by Kalmback Publishing     £25 Sold - Thanks John
      2) Observing the Moon - Peter T. Wlasuk 2000 published by Springer           £12 Sold - thanks James
      3) The Hatfield SCT Lunar Atlas - edited by Jeremy Cook 2005 published by Springer      £20 Sold - Thanks Vin
      4) New Atlas of the Moon - Thierry Legault & Serge Brunier 2006 published by Firefly Books - note this is a large hard cover, spiral bound book     £15 Sold - thanks James
      5) Atlas of the Lunar Terminator - John E. Westfall 2000 published by Cambridge University Press £20 SOLD thanks Ade
      Thanks for looking
      Neil
       










    • By Dylan1
      Hi All,

      Complete beginner here, with this being my first post to the forum. 
      I recently bought my first scope and I've had a couple nights so far with just viewing. I've now decided to try my hand at utilising my camera and hoping to try stack images and get a decent shot of the moon. The issue I'm having at the moment is that I can't seem to get the moon fully in frame. Using a T ring adapter and Barlow lens attached to my scope I'm essentially cropping out edges of the moon, however when I remove the actual barlow lens and use only the adapter, T ring and my scope as the prime, I can't seem to focus. 

      This may be a pretty basic issue, so apologies, I haven't had much luck with google yet. I'm unsure if I require some sort of reducer or if I'm perhaps overlooking something. 

      For reference I'm using the following:
      Celestron 130 EQ Fujifilm XT3 (APS-C) Barlow adapter/lens Kipon T2 Adapter for Fuji
      Really appreciate any guidance or advice you can offer. 

      Dylan

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.