Jump to content

Hi-Res termy mosaic. 27-10-17

xtreemchaos

By xtreemchaos
in Imaging - Lunar

Recommended Posts

xtreemchaos

xtreemchaos

Posted
Posted

heres my termy mosaic , taken with a starwave 102 at 1800hr when still light so ill call it a dusk shot.

best viewed in full, but its 32mb so if you have a slow internet it may take a while to load, my net still runs on clockwork :happy7:

.clear skys charl.

59f59b920dae5_moonhirest27-10-17.thumb.png.18859db4ad133c3e54a42b176bd7f7f1.png

heres some panes to save making full.

59f59d14c6b9e_mooncu427-10-17.thumb.png.3bcf8f4920f7796a904c9659550481c1.png

59f59d7a75ca3_mooncu2hr27-10-17.thumb.png.c76ef5cb183b081557472689f3d7ab3c.png

59f59d4ab45ca_mooncu2hr27-10-17.thumb.png.762e4e9736dad9ff22f5fc5db45a772e.png

59f59da6bb7ef_moonhrcus27-10-17.thumb.png.a42d67b6250fb8ef89ce3a9342bfb60a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
xtreemchaos

xtreemchaos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

thanks Fozzie, this is a asi120mc for a change at 1200x900 per panel added together 4600x900 huge works out  a lot bigger than I get with my 1200d, clear skys. charl.  ps sorry got the math wrong its 3600x1200 my brain hasn't woke up yet :happy7:...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarsG76

MarsG76

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, xtreemchaos said:

thanks Mg, if only we could get that sort of res to see the buggy tracks, id need a frac with a 3mtr lens. clear skys. charl.

Maybe not... where's there a will there's a way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarsG76

MarsG76

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, xtreemchaos said:

agreed MG, never say never, I wonder what mag it would take ? heres my wild guess to see the lander x1800 that's 3 times whats possible with the cleanest clear skys. charl.

1800X is about the "magnification" some do imaging at already... a 3X Barlow on a 1/2" CCD through a 8 or 10" scope that around f10 native would be about that...

i think the limitation is in the wavelengthvtgat the atmosphere cuts out... give or take 380nm??? And is that is the highest frequency that can penetrate the atmosphere than there is the limitation to how much detail can be "encoded" into a certain wavelength or frequency of light... 380nm at 350,000km was about 650m/pixel detail... now that was with perfect seeing and transparency (I looked into exactly this read about it a while ago)...

I'm sure that there is a way to overcome that limitation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
xtreemchaos

xtreemchaos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

arhh so you you want to take a pic then, I would of been happy to just see it :happy7:, agree with the tec-details I think the biggist prob would be seeing with the atmos it makes anything above 600x very hard here in the uk with the permacloud. charl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarsG76

MarsG76

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, xtreemchaos said:

arhh so you you want to take a pic then, I would of been happy to just see it :happy7:, agree with the tec-details I think the biggist prob would be seeing with the atmos it makes anything above 600x very hard here in the uk with the permacloud. charl.

After imaging a couple of images I have in mind... one of which is being imaged in the LAB as I write,  I'll join you get into imaging the moon and the sun, see what eventuates...

The permacloud is a problem... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.