Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_solar_25_winners.thumb.jpg.fe4e711c64054f3c9486c752d0bcd6f2.jpg

Victor Boesen

Skywatcher star adventurer - Upgrades has been made...

Recommended Posts

My star adventurer setup has looked like this since I got my star adventurer:
19458075_441212092912326_1028594863_n.thumb.jpg.d1f5e90f7c6cbb7257dafe1988974ee8.jpg

The tripod I used was not stable enough and I felt like it was the reason of not being able to get good enough PA. I had to sit on the ground to look through the polar scope (not that fun to do on wet grass), and when I put the wedge and camera back on the tripod after doing PA, I suspect the tripod lean back a little messing up PA.

I have just been to USA and Canada, where I bought a Manfrotto 055XPRO3 and a Manfrotto 496 RC2 ballhead. I certainly paid for it but I am very happy with my purchase. The tripod feels a lot more study and solid, and so does the ballhead. Because of the ballhead, I can also use the star adventurer without the wedge and counterweights.

Overall very happy with the look of my setup, and I am very satisfied with my purchase.
22811634_492498867783648_561055186_n.jpg?oh=29286f318de59404e10153da3bcdf1d3&oe=59F3E58E
The tripod is so solid and stable that I can extend the legs when using it (not fully though, that would be stupid), and now I only have to sit on a knee to look through the polar scope.

Clear skies!

Victor Boesen

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its an easy fix for the polarscope, just use one of these.. A right angled camera viewfinder, I use all my mounts at the lowest height possible.

 59f243b665491_Seagullrightanglefinder-7.jpg.279699ef9ff4758592d2fb4c2ebb62d1.jpg

Alan

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Alien 13 said:

Its an easy fix for the polarscope, just use one of these.. A right angled camera viewfinder, I use all my mounts at the lowest height possible.

 59f243b665491_Seagullrightanglefinder-7.jpg.279699ef9ff4758592d2fb4c2ebb62d1.jpg

Alan

I've seen those before but I couldn't figure out how to mount it on the polar scope?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Victor Boesen said:

I've seen those before but I couldn't figure out how to mount it on the polar scope?

You can do a DIY job if you want but I just hold it against the polarscope, the positioning doesn't even have to be that accurate to see an image..

Alan

Edited by Alien 13
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if in your first setup was also impacted by having the adjustable tripod head, I've removed this from my tripod, it is just something that you don't need if you have the wedge. I use the velbon d7000, and quite like the 3 'cross-bars' between the legs as I can put extra weights on these for added stability.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Polemaster with my SWA and wouldn't be without it.

Can I suggest that you never extend the legs on a photographic tripod, using the polemaster I can keep my setup no higher than 12" off the ground.

Edited by Jkulin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alien 13 said:

You can do a DIY job if you want but I just hold it against the polarscope, the positioning doesn't even have to be that accurate to see an image..

Alan

ohhh, thank you for your help!

Victor Boesen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, thomasv said:

Wonder if in your first setup was also impacted by having the adjustable tripod head, I've removed this from my tripod, it is just something that you don't need if you have the wedge. I use the velbon d7000, and quite like the 3 'cross-bars' between the legs as I can put extra weights on these for added stability.

 

I had a velbon videmate 638, and the head couldn't be taken off (trust me I've tried!:wink:) The legs also bent a little when you applied pressure to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Jkulin said:

I use a Polemaster with my SWA and wouldn't be without it.

Can I suggest that you never extend the legs on a photographic tripod, using the polemaster I can keep my setup no higher than 12" off the ground.

I have heard many good things about the polemaster, but I have never figured out how it works. I know that it would be best if the legs were not extended at all, and I will probably do that in the future unless I am set up somewhere where I don't really want to sit down.

How does polemaster work? do you need a computer or any cables and such?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Victor, yes you would need a computer, preferably a laptop, you would mount the camera and plug it into your laptop, point it towards North and at the correct Latitude for your location, once you see Polaris on your screen, it will actually tell you what to do at each stage, it really is foolproof and for someone like me it take the confusion out of Polar Alignment.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jkulin said:

Hi Victor, yes you would need a computer, preferably a laptop, you would mount the camera and plug it into your laptop, point it towards North and at the correct Latitude for your location, once you see Polaris on your screen, it will actually tell you what to do at each stage, it really is foolproof and for someone like me it take the confusion out of Polar Alignment.

Thanks! I think I will wait for now because I just want my star adventurer to be as easy to pack up and down as possible. I know it would help me a lot, but I am enjoying that I don't have to use a computer, or have any cables and such.

Maybe in the future:icon_biggrin:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The SA only tracks on one axis, of you aren't using the wedge what are you doing to set the latidude angle for your SA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

The SA only tracks on one axis, of you aren't using the wedge what are you doing to set the latidude angle for your SA?

It's difficult to explain but Trevor from astrobackyard uses the ioptron skyguider pro, and it has the exact same features as the SA. He mounts his camera the exact same way.

Link to his post on his website:
https://astrobackyard.com/ioptron-skyguider-pro-review/ 

I know if I use a really heavy lens (which I don't have ATM) I would have to use the wedge and the counterweight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see from that link that they are using in fact two ball heads. One ball head being used to polar align the mount (getting the angle for the latitude) and the other being used for the camera mount as normally expected. Can't say I think that provides a quicker method, particularly if the user already owns the wedge for the Star Adventurer but I can see what you mean now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, m.tweedy said:

If you are prepared to pay the price (i was-see avatar) then this is great

http://www.365astronomy.com/Amici-Prism-for-Polarscope.html

Looks like a nice piece of equipment, but as you mention yourself the price is a downside. But thank you for the recommendation!

victor boesen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/10/2017 at 23:56, Victor Boesen said:

Thanks! I think I will wait for now because I just want my star adventurer to be as easy to pack up and down as possible. I know it would help me a lot, but I am enjoying that I don't have to use a computer, or have any cables and such.

Maybe in the future:icon_biggrin:

Once polar aligned you can pack your laptop and polemaster away so you can still have an easy job packing up at the end of your session. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Astrofriend
      Hi,
      When you for the first time setup an off-axis adapter it can be confusing, at least it was for me. I have written down a tutorial that maybe can be of some help:
      http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/tutorials/tutorial-setup-off-axis-adapter/01-tutorial-setup-off-axis-adapter.html
      I will edit and do some complement in the text later.
      A question to all you that already have an off-axis adapter, what make and model do you have ? Are you satisfaid with it ?
      /Lars
    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





    • By AstroRuz
      Skywatcher 150/1200 f8 planetary Newtonian.
      Bought this originally intending to set up a planetary rig but circumstances call for sale.
      Will come with eyepieces and a collimation eyepiece. Not used by myself and has seen very little use. Mirrors in good condition
      Collection only
      £50



    • By jadcx
      Skywatcher 80 ED DS-Pro outfit including matched flattener and motor focus. Now only £350
      This kit gives you a great introduction to astronomy and imaging, which is why it's so popular.  You can see details over at FLO but there is:
      80 ED Ds-Pro OTA (Objective Lens Diameter: 80mm, Telescope Focal Length: 600mm,  f/7.5)
      SW Eyepiece (2"): 28mm
      2”/50.8mm Di-Electric Star Diagonal
      9x50 Finderscope
      Dual-Speed 11:1 2” Crayford Focuser (Backlash-Free)
      Supplied with Tube Rings & Mounting Plate - please note there is a longer black vixen type dovetail fitted, not the fancy new green short one you will see on the FLO site
      SW motor focus and fitting kit - I've never used this, hence it's not fitted (more details over on FLO)
      Dedicated SW 0.85x reducer/flattener (see FLO for more details)
      Aluminium Carrying / Shipping Case
       
      The RRP is over £720, so grab a bargain while you can.
      Collection from Nottingham, or DHL for £20 (within UK)



    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.