Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, 
I have just joined this online community hoping it will assist me in progressing with my astronomy.
I have wanted to get into astrophotography for years. I have watched the stars and planets with my eyes and with the assistance of quality binoculars for what seems like a long time. I have sat on the fence so to speak because I have never had the confidence to move forward as the whole imaging thing seems to be so complicating and confusing. However I did buy a portable EQ head to see what I could achieve with my DSLR and a wide angle lens. I have been pleased with my photos of the Milky Way and meteor showers. 

The problem is that it has left me wanting more. Using the portable EQ head has taught me quite a few things. I can now accurately align to Polaris and achieve images of around 3-4 minutes with a wide angle lens. I have even achieved a credible but all be it small image of the Orion Nebula, due to a 70-200 mm Canon lens being a bit short in focal length for the subject. If I remember right exposure was about 120 seconds. The trouble is that the portable EQ head can only handle small payloads.

I would like to achieve much closer and better quality photos of some of the Nebula, but getting honest advice from people as to the equipment I would need seems to be so varied and inconsistent. Dealers are quite happy to sell you the gear they have, but I am uncertain that they always have my best interest at heart. I know it will take time, patience, planning and technique to achieve my goal of taking wonderful photos of the night sky, and I am quite prepared to work at it.

Although I have a Canon lens at about 500 mm, I have been told that I would be better off buying a triplet APO refractor and a full EQ mount. I have been advised to go for either an Altair or Skywatcher 80 or 100 triplet together with an EQ 5. My DSLR is full frame by the way.

I just wondered if other forum members could  offer any advice? Am I better going for a 80 or 100 refractor triplet or is there something better? And what about the EQ mount? Also do I need a guide scope, or is this not necessary? I joined another online forum, but no-one could give me real life experience of using either of the telescope manufacturer's focal lengths or mounts. So I am still very much undecided which way to go. Any advice or experience of equipment would be gratefully received. This would be most likely to be a 'once in a lifetime' purchase for me, so I cannot afford to make a huge mistake in buying the wrong equipment. I fully understand that if you want to view and image DSO you need one type of scope, whilst planetary is a complete different thing. My interest at the moment would be DSO. 
May I take this opportunity of thanking anyone in advance who takes their time to post a reply to the above.

Link to post
Share on other sites


5 hours ago, Lobo Cielo said:
Although I have a Canon lens at about 500 mm, I have been told that I would be better off buying a triplet APO refractor and a full EQ mount. I have been advised to go for either an Altair or Skywatcher 80 or 100 triplet together with an EQ 5. My DSLR is full frame by the way.
Am I better going for a 80 or 100 refractor triplet or is there something better? And what about the EQ mount? Also do I need a guide scope, or is this not necessary?


Welcome to SGL

What 500mm lens is it?

I would not discount it so fast. If you can use it then you may be able to get a better mount with the money you save on a triplet apo. Something like a HEQ5 pro or a NEQ6 would be a good place to start as opposed to the EQ5. Especially when you are talking about once in a lifetime purchases then I would be tempted to get a better mount.

If you have your heart set on a EQ5 and a triplet APO then i would say go for a 71mm or the 80mm as the 100mm is asking a bit too much of the EQ5 in terms of weight handling.

It may help to know which full frame camera you actually have? As to be honest with not all scopes will cover a fill frame sensor and you would need very large filters. Most people do not use full frame sensors for that reason. Not that you cant crop it down mind you.

You dont NEED a guide scope but you will likely want one at some point. The thing is that it can all be a little daunting when you first start so its sometimes best to buy things in steps so that you dont spend all night fighting issues with equipment and never actually take a shot.

Also a budget would be useful. As if you have the cash to be considering a 100mm triplet apo then (ill say it again) you really should be diverting more of that into the mount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Lobo,

I also agree with @Adam J . You have started well: you know you want to do AP, you know and appreciate polar alignment (although polar alignment will need to be more accurate with greater focal lengths). Now you need a solid mount. The HEQ5 and EQ6 mounts are the standard astrophotography mounts and have a huge following. I started with an EQ5 and it is a good mount, I could put a 120 f8 refractor on it with a guidescope piggybacked and it did work...just. I did lose quite a lot of frames which prompted me to go for the AZ EQ6 which is far more steady.

Your 500mm Canon lens sounds great for AP, it should illuminate your FF sensor and give a FoV that covers big targets like M42, M31, Heart and Soul nebula etc... One issue I've heard of using these type of lenses are diffraction effects caused by the aperture blades, I don't have one so I can't say if this is a common problem from experience.  Also, as mentioned getting filters for a big sensor can be difficult.

Guiding will be necessary at some point because it combats the effects of sub-perfect polar alignment, mechanical imperfections in the mount, wind and other disturbances that can affect your images. I use a ST80 and a synguider and it works well for me. Others use different set ups, e.g. adapted finder scopes (cheaper than ST 80) fitted with guidecams controlled using a laptop. There are lots of options!

HTH! Dan.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all for your advice which I will take on board. I have some further questions to ask; if I use my dslr ( I have both a Canon 5D mk iii and a 1DX) coupled to one of my big lenses, probably a 300 mm f2.8, how would you attach this to the EQ head and how would you mount a spotting scope or guide scope to the setup. Also I have read about the effects of dark current, especially on the 1DX. Am I better just going for a astro camera in the first place?

The other thing is would you mind clarifying the point about large filters. Are these the ones that fit behind the lens over the DSLR sensor to remove light pollution of enhance different bandwidths of light?

I have read books like Turn Left at Orion, the Backyard Astronomy Guide and Digital SLR Photography by Covington and tried to absorb as much information as possible. However there is so much to learn! Making Every Photon Count sounds really interesting; I am guessing that the thrust of the book is using as few glass elements in your collector lens or telescope as possible, to gather as much light in the shortest possible time and stacking multiple images. Don't know if m assumption is right?

I come from a background of semi-pro photography and I appreciate quality optics, and have come to realise that you get what you pay for, and sadly to secure good gear you have to fork out major dosh for it☹️

Any further advice regarding the above is greatly appreciated and thank you for taking the time to post your thoughts!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lobo, welcome to the forum!

I don't know what i can say, but i am new here, and i started this year. I do have Canon DSLRs including 1DX and older models such as 1Ds3 and 1D3 and even 1Ds2 and 5D classic, but i knew that those will be just fine but not mind blowing results until i can really modify one of them and start to use filters, and i do live in a light pollution urban so many advised me to go narrowbanding which is expensive, but i have to if i want quality.

As folks told you, you must get a mount, EQ type, i started this year and i didn't try to save much and i got AZ-EQ6 brand new, i wanted a mount that can last for 2-3 years rather than a mount that last for about 6 months if i start using it, AVX and EQ5 are good mounts but have limitations, even my AZ-EQ6 has limitations but its limitations is less than AVX/EQ5, so it can last slightly longer.

Once you buy the mount then other things will come smoothly, you will know which dovetail to buy, you will know which adapter, you will know which equipment to load on that mount because you will be given the payload capacity, if you think about accessories now you may end up not using something due to wrong choice or not compatible with mount or it is not enough, i bought the mount first, and because the price was high so i bought Skywatcher ST80 to start with until one day my budget recovers, then i can afford a better scope that can be handled on the mount.

Many told me to learn the sky, so you will have an idea what do you want to shoot, and maybe it can tell you the limitation of your DSLR upon different targets, but if you are wealthy or lucky enough then the best way to do is buy the mount first, and then buy a cooled astro mono camera then slowly add filters, you will be amazed with what you can get, you can use your Canon lenses first then later add a proper telescope.

Books are nice, add to that some videos too, both will put you on track, i keep going and hope sooner or later i can get there, you said you are a semi pro photographer, so that will help you in this journey.


Good luck and clear skies!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you TareqPhoto for the feedback. You have raised some good points. I will give the equipment choice some more thought before I purchase. I just can’t wait to get stuck in and have a go. I used a Star Adventurer the other night and loaded it up with my 300 lens. However the mount seemed to struggle despite it being within the payload tolerances. I then swapped to a 70-200 zoom and managed to catch a spiral galaxy, albeit small, on the final image. 

Can you or anyone advise on the post production workflow after taking a series of light frames? How does taking multiple images amount to a single long exposure when stacked? Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lobo Cielo said:

Can you or anyone advise on the post production workflow after taking a series of light frames? How does taking multiple images amount to a single long exposure when stacked? Many thanks.

You can download Deep Sky Stacker (DSS) free stacking software, there are quite a lot of tutorials on Y'Tube for it.

The idea of taking multiple exposures is to try to remove " noise " the more frames you stack the more the noise is reduced and the more processing you can do on your image without pulling out the noise.


Edited by Davey-T
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface 16 April 2021 21:32 Celestron NexStar 6SE ZWO ASI 462mc
    • By AlvinP
      I've been on these forums a couple of times for the last 2 weeks and ive found amazing advice, on telescopes, mounts and eyepiece. Besides reading countless of information on the internet about various equipments; pros and cons; and i got some queries about how to upgrade my setup.
      My original purchase was a 15x70 Celestron Binoculars last year, and boy ive seen amazing things with it, specially globular clusters, Jupiter and Saturn and the Orion's Nebula; for me these were amazing; i still use them given how easy it is to look at the sky with them and how bright and full everything looks.  A couple of months ago i got a 70x400mm Gskyer Telescope with an AZ mount (The cheap 99$ one that Amazon is displaying on all its adds for the last two months)  it came with a 25mm and a 10mm eyepieces as well as a x3 barlows (which i didnt even count as part of my scope as it is too bad quality and i havent managed a single decent view with it).

      Currently My Celestron Binoculars (x15) seem better for visualizing the sky than the 25mm eyepiece (x16) (things seem a very bit dimmer). And since the Barlow is a "no go", the 10mm (x40) eyepiece is what i really use, it has decent zoom and detailed views , it is my go to eyepiece most of the nights.
      However from reading all around, ive read that most of the stuff that come with the Telescope (aside from the scope itself) are actually really bad quality, specially no name brands without even webpage, so if i were to maximise my telescope i should update some of those items.
      -Recently i ordered a new Start diagonal to replace to default one (ive heard on Refractors its usually the weakest link next to eyepieces) as well as an economic x2 Barlow lens
      Keep in mind i recognize my 70mm cheap telescope will not suddendly become the Hubble Telescope, and that it doesnt matter how hard i push it, in the end such a low scope will be bound to hit its limit pretty fast, thats why i avoid 70$+ eyepieces and barlows for now.
      I expect to keep using this telescope for a good couple of months; at least until around August, when Jupiter and Saturn are more in the night sky, rather than morning.

      Now, im very satisfied with my current telescope; while the phone mount is garbage and the phone weight and the sound of my heartbeats pretty much shake the telescope out of position, as well as how cheap the mount is; it still gets the job done for seeing interesting stuff in the sky and i have managed to do some AP for some of the globular clusters, bunch of 1-2s images (with the wrong lens), not the best, not even good pictures; but decent overall for my equipment. I am currently interested in stargazing in general and some minor AP (as i dont have a camera, currently an Iphone 7s with the mount) Buuut im interested in borrowing a camera for the low sky photos without a telescope.
      I do most 97% of my Skywatching on my backyard, i live in a small country, there is some light pollution, but i can see the pleiades and the orion's nebula core on the naked eye most nights (so i guess its not that contaminated lol)
      Now; currently i like finding stuff by myself and show it to the other people around me who cant be bothered to find the moon in the sky, so setting up, finding and seeing stuff is part of what i like. 
      With all the above in mind..... Id like to plan ahead for my next purchases.
      First, im thinking a x3 barlow lens (to replace the original crappy one) and a 15mm lens (to have a bit better view than the 10mm, but less spread than the 25mm) in two or three months (with this id be able to check if my new eyepiece outperforms my default ones, but given the quality of the scope, i dont expect this to be noticeable).
      And Afterwards id love to get a new Scope, but im not quite sure what i want... and i would like some advice and help in choosing my next Scope upgrade.
      -I entered with and im liking the refractors; however i dont wanna spend 300-400$ on another refractor that is 20-30% better for triple the price
      -Ive heard really long focal lenght might bring some distortions; and also make the scope much bulkier, annnd most importantly i know that magnification is not everything; so a 1000mm long tube would prob bring too much magnifications for me to use properly on my backyard skies. So i think id settle for a maximum of 600-700mm.
      -Originally i was againts Newtonians in general, those inverted views scared me, i have a hard time of my own with my finderscope. Then i found out that Reflectors are the name of efficiency as they have more value per aperture than refractors; and as someone once mentioned "There is not really up and down in space, you will get used to it" annnd its true... save for references on the ground, like buildings, trees and mountains to help you locate where you are in the sky; once you are on it, you dont need right ups and downs.
      -I did see some 90mm Orion's Refractors as well as 90-102 Celestron Astromaster Refractors (these are 350-400$)
      -Im thinking a 130mm reflector is what im looking for; i think the 130mm aperture is a nice upgrade for my 70mm, and will keep me occupied for quite a long time; ive read about Orion SpaceProbe 130EQ and Celestron Astromaster 130EQ (ive also read, Power Seekers and Astromaster's are made out of pretty much garbage lol) Ive read that the main issue is the constant collimation required for them; but ive also read its something that can be learned and once you get used to it; its a pretty easy thing to do to keep getting amazing views.
      -Ive also seen people recommending  6-8'' Dobsonians; i know the deal with them; if anything i could aim for a 6'' one i found a litter under 300$ ive read they are amazing values for their aperture
      So, TL;DR: I have a 70x400mm Telescope, im new to stargazing, im really amazed and excited by what im seeing with my current scope, but would like an stable upgrade before the end of the year that will last me a year or two. I am interesteted both in regular and deep sky stargazing and astrophotography;  im not currently interested in an motorized mount; could deal with a regular Equatorial mount. But overall i am looking for  more aperture (100-150mm) to have clearer views; than focal lenght for zoom.

      Im also open to the fact that at one point i might have to get a scope for stargazing and another for AP; but would like an upgrade that could help me all around for both while i get initiated.
      Sorrry for the Huuuuuuuuge post, i was very excited while writing it; please let me know what you think and if there's anything else you'd want me to add to help understand my situation, thanks in advance!
    • By MarsG76
      This is NGC3603 and NGC3576 (AKA The "Statue of Liberty" nebula), a massive H-Alpha region containing a very compact open cluster, located in the constellation "Carina" about 20,000LY away.
      I took this photo on multiple nights, between 19th February and 15th March 2021.
      Imaged using my cooled and full spectrum modded Canon 40D DSLR attached to a Bosma 80mm f6.25 refractor on a CGEM equatorial mount.
      Total exposure time was 22 Hours and 1 minute using 7nm HII, OIII and SII Narrowband filters and stars are from natural color (UV/IR Cut filter) subs... imaged from a semi rural sky.
      HII: 6x600s, 6x900s and 4x1200s subs,
      OIII: 10x900s, 8x1200s and 1x1800s subs
      SII: 18x1800s subs
      RGB: 19x60s, 19x120s, 18x180s and 20x300s subs @ ISO1600.
    • By Yannick
      I recently got the eq3-2 synscan mount to start with astrophotography. I first wanted to get the eq5 goto mount, but it is way out of my budget, and I could not find any good used ones that would fit my budget. Furthermore, I hear a lot of people talking about how eq3-2 is not that good for astrophotography, but what are some things I can do to improve the mount. Cheers guys.
    • By Daniel Valencia
      Hi Guys!
      My name is Daniel and I am from Ecuador, I love astronomy and the secrets our universe holds. I love Jupiter, our big brother, so I opened this forum to talk about facts, secrets, theories, etc. About our gas giant!
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.