Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_supernovae_remnants_winners.thumb.jpg.a13d54fa405efa94ed30e7abd590ee55.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Im living in a fairly light polluted area, and have a Skywatcher 200p on an eq5 pro mount. I've been using my phone to take pictures of varies objects with varying degrees of success ( mainly due to mounting my phone to the telescope) but ive decided id like to take imaging a little more seriously and am looking to get a DSLR with the interest of deep sky astrophotography. having said that i dont have £5k for blow on a camera and am looking to spend around the £100 mark, but dont know cameras and dont know what the best camera in my price range would be. I realize i wont be able to do too long a exposure because of my mount being unguided and it being a eq5 pro not a Heq5. any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. 

Daniel  

Edited by dan_19991

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your eq5 have tracking? If not then your exposures will have to be extremely short due to the long focal length of your scope.

A canon 450d is a good starting camera and can be picked up 2nd hand quite cheap. 

Look on sites like camerajungle and mpb, they usually have cheap 2nd hand cameras.

Theres one on mpb now for £89 which is in your budget range.

https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-canon-digital-slr-cameras/canon-eos-450d/sku-690322/?gclid=CjwKCAjwmefOBRBJEiwAf7DstMrKvERKiCMwcqpoCH2eQRR1RWgjy5drVZ-MN0N9cN7Aafn3uQQw7BoC55gQAvD_BwE

Edited by geordie85
Added link to dslr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to take a look on the Wex photographic site at used Canon 1000D, you should be able to pick up a good used DSLR body for under £100

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, geordie85 said:

Does your eq5 have tracking? If not then your exposures will have to be extremely short due to the long focal length of your scope.

A canon 450d is a good starting camera and can be picked up 2nd hand quite cheap. 

Look on sites like camerajungle and mpb, they usually have cheap 2nd hand cameras.

Yes its full GOTO mount but from what ive researched, ill be on, or over the limit as far as weight goes for imaging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could get a Canon 1000D body on ebay for under £100.

It works fine for me and you can use all the usual free software to control it remotely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Kropster said:

You could get a Canon 1000D body on ebay for under £100.

It works fine for me and you can use all the usual free software to control it remotely.

Is the 1000D able to be controlled remotely including starting and ending exposures, because i figured that was a fairly mid to high end feature. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, dan_19991 said:

Is the 1000D able to be controlled remotely including starting and ending exposures, because i figured that was a fairly mid to high end feature. 

Yes, the 1000D can be hooked up to EOS utility's software 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, dan_19991 said:

Thanks for the advice, having looked would the 1100d be a better option or is it not worth the extra money?

It might be, since (I think) it has a newer DIGIC processor (v4), and a deeper well depth. The only possible downside is that it may be harder to modify (the 1000d is pretty easy to take apart).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

It might be, since (I think) it has a newer DIGIC processor (v4), and a deeper well depth. The only possible downside is that it may be harder to modify (the 1000d is pretty easy to take apart).

yeah i guess the noise would be slightly less but its another £50 or so, plus i would like to be able to modify it sooner or later. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody know what kind of exposuress i can expect to get from a eq5 mount with a 8 inch 200p telescope on it, without auto guiding that is. thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dan_19991 said:

yeah i guess the noise would be slightly less but its another £50 or so, plus i would like to be able to modify it sooner or later. 

Perhaps its worth going for the 1000d then, that way if you brick it you havent lost too much. My 1000d has been pretty solid, I've had it for 8 years and its never given me any problems.

If you want to mod it, be sure to check out the Gary Honis tutorial - that will show you what screws (and in which order) to remove them. I also need to note that if you remove the first UV/IR filter - your autofocus will no longer work properly (in case you still want to use it for daytime photography). However, there are online services for modding - but those would probably cost more than the camera itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, dan_19991 said:

Anybody know what kind of exposuress i can expect to get from a eq5 mount with a 8 inch 200p telescope on it, without auto guiding that is. thanks

Without autoguiding @ 1000mm? Not very long, depending on your polar alignment I wouldnt expect much more than 10s. Though some may get more out of theirs if they drift align.

If youve got a 200p, you probably got a 9x50 finder with it... well... thats your guidescope!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, dan_19991 said:

Anybody know what kind of exposuress i can expect to get from a eq5 mount with a 8 inch 200p telescope on it, without auto guiding that is. thanks

Depends on several factors including how well the mount is polar aligned. Does the mount have a built in polar telescope?

When I used my 200p on an old version EQ5 I could get 30 to 60 second exposures without too significant star trailing. Longer exposures were a bit hit and miss.  

 

Edited by Ouroboros

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

Without autoguiding @ 1000mm? Not very long, depending on your polar alignment I wouldnt expect much more than 10s. Though some may get more out of theirs if they drift align.

If youve got a 200p, you probably got a 9x50 finder with it... well... thats your guidescope!

im surprised about the 10 seconds, i knew itd be short however. regarding the autoguiding, it does come with a 9x50 but i figured autoguiding cameras had to be ccds and theyre pretty expensive right? also im pretty sure im already over the weigh limit, would that extra weight help or hinder? thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say 10s if you want pinpoint stars, as mentioned above you could go for longer but that depends on how tolerant you are of eggy stars ;) (I have a zero tolerance policy)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ouroboros said:

Depends on several factors including how well the mount is polar aligned. Does the mount have a built in polar telescope?

When I used my old version EQ5 I could get 30 to 60 second exposures without too significant star trailing. Longer exposures were a bit hit and miss.  

 

yes it has its own polar scope, would it come down to spending the extra time getting a really good polar alignment to get the extra exposure time, even though im on the heavy side or will the weight not affect it that much if im only doing 60 second exposures? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Uranium235 said:

I say 10s if you want pinpoint stars, as mentioned above you could go for longer but that depends on how tolerant you are of eggy stars ;) (I have a zero tolerance policy)

ahh, in that case im not to picky about the stars being perfect because im well aware my set up is not the best but i fear i might adopt the same policy in the future lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you wont know until you try ey! :) Just give it a go, you might be surprised.

You might want to try some easy things first... globular/open clusters or bright planetary nebulas - those can be gobbled up pretty quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

Well, you wont know until you try ey! :) Just give it a go, you might be surprised.

You might want to try some easy things first... globular/open clusters or bright planetary nebulas - those can be gobbled up pretty quickly.

very true and i like the idea of using the guide scope as  an autoguider, do you know if that would require an expensive ccd? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, dan_19991 said:

very true and i like the idea of using the guide scope as  an autoguider, do you know if that would require an expensive ccd? 

Not really, some people use a modified webcam - but to ensure you always get a guide star a QHY5 or one of the ZWO cameras is all you need.... anything with an ST4 port will do. Plus you need the adaptor to connect it to the finder... one of these:

https://www.modernastronomy.com/shop/accessories/adapters/sky-watcher-clones-to-t-thread-adapter-for-straight-through-finders/

Edit... Hmmm out of stock though, so you might need to hunt around a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One caveat though... Autoguiding takes time to master, dont expect it to work perfectly off the bat. There is always some degree of fiddling involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1000D is a fantastic camera for astro at the price, in fact I did a comparison with the 450D once and the 1000D came out better despite being more noisy because the bigger pixels draw in so much more signal. Lost of web pages will say get the 450D on the basis of its lower noise but they fail to consider the larger pixels. Also it runs cooler when imaging over a longer period. If it only has a 14bit ADC instead of the 12 bit and better amp glow reduction then it would have been a awesome camera indeed.

 

As Uranium says its very easy to modify.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, dan_19991 said:

yes it has its own polar scope, would it come down to spending the extra time getting a really good polar alignment to get the extra exposure time, even though im on the heavy side or will the weight not affect it that much if im only doing 60 second exposures? 

Better results will always be had by spending time polar aligning carefully. I wouldn't say weight is a severe problem in your case, though as with everyone, careful balancing is important. Imagers are often advised to make the eastern side of the RA axis ever so slightly heavy so the motors are always driving forwards against a weight. 

As for the DSLR I use a 450D, which does the job. I'm not going to enter into which of the several older DSLRs are better because I simply don't know. I just know the 450D was and is highly thought of. Something I might consider now is whether I could get a DSLR with a flip out screen. A flip out screen is most helpful when setting up the camera and for using 'live view' for focusing. It's not impossible without one, but sometimes the scope and camera get themselves into orientations that make seeing a fixed screen really difficult. 

I think you've got the right attitude. You're aware that you're going to find using this scope and mount a challenge. But there's no reason why you shouldn't produce some satisfying results.  Most importantly you'll learn a huge amount without a huge additional outlay. Plus you can continue  using the DSLR if at some time in the future you upgrade the mount.  

I suggest it would be useful to buy a DSLR with at least the standard canon kit lens. This will enable you to learn how the camera functions during the day. You'll also have a useful conventional camera. Plus you could attach it to your mount and take some quite long exposure wide field pictures. 

Edited by Ouroboros

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys!i need to make this quick! I want to get a new 6mm eyepiece.I have a 8" f6 dob and i want to get a nice 200 mag and put the telescope to its limits at 400x
      The most i ve seen with is 240x for Jupiter and Saturn .i ve heard they looked stunning at 400x and i am keen on trying it.Ive got my eyes on a 6mm Skywatcher UWA eyepiece.and i have a Bst Starguider 2z Barlow lens.And i seem to be having problems with my 8mm Bst Starguider (300x in total).the bst has a 16mm eye relief and a 21mm lens diameter,but when i barlowed it and look at the moon yesterday,it was hard finding the right spot to look through the eyepiece and when i moved the image disappeared.I dont know if it will have that effect on planets,when I looked at mars it was fine but i definitely want to avoid that from happening again.Will it happen?
      The Skywatcher eyepiece i want to buy has a 16mm eye relief too.I dont want to make the same mistake now , i want a 6mm eyepiece at the price range of 50-70 euro either from flo or amazonuk.If the Skywatcher will have similar results,can you suggest another one?
    • By Bigwings
      I need my garage back so am selling my excess mounts.
      1. EQ5 motorised on both axis.
      No tripod this was mounted ony pier. Tracks well. 
      £100 Collect only because of weight .
      2. An older type Skywatcher AZ goto mount that came with my SkyMax 127. Good condition .
      £100 Collect please but might be able to send if you arrange courier.
      SOLDto Pitbull ...thanks
      3. AZ GTi  goto in excellent condition . Still have the box so can send at cost.
      The pic shows it with a telescope on it which is not included.
      £200
      Location just north of Newark on A1
      Clear Skies.
      Thanks for looking
       
       
       



    • By Dinglem
      I've upgraded my focuser so have a Skywatcher Dual-Speed Low Profile 1.25/2" Crayford focuser for sale £70 delivered to UK only.
      Bank transfer or Paypal F&F preferred.
       
       

    • By kman42
      I have an EQ5 telescope mount which i use for astrophotography. I have modified it with a motorised RA axis using a bipolar stepper motor - my thread for the build is here .
      I want to expand the mount's tracking ability by motorising the DEC axis and using a guide scope/camera. I generally use the mount in fairly remote locations so would like to use a raspberry Pi for portability.
      I understand that I'll need to use a Raspberry Pi Camera Module for the guide camera. 
      The capability I want is:
      1. guide the mount along RA and DEC axes using a guide star as feedback
      2. track the mount using the RA axis only, and if possible continuously take 20-30 second exposures on the guide camera (this functionality is optional, but would assist in polar alignment of the mount)
      I don't want any GOTO capability. I am very new to RPi and need some help:
      - do I need to write code for this, or is there existing programming available for what I want to do?
      - is it possible to avoid the use of screens (in the field)? My preferred option would be to flick a switch to start and stop the guiding, with another switch for alignment mode (or something simple like this).
      - do I need to use any particular stepper motors/drivers for raspberry Pi? I'm using a bipolar stepper motor running quarter steps, with an A4988 stepper driver
      - is the RPi 3 Model B+ the unit I should buy?
      Thanks
       
    • By Owmuchonomy
      Wrapping up in double layer goose feathers I braved the obsy last night.  I planned a tour of Auriga with a view to chucking in some favourites.  I set up the ED150 on the AZ EQ 6 and fitted the WO quartz diagonal accompanied by my ES 20mm 82'.  I stuffed my Astronomik 1.25" UHC (bargain price thanks @FLO) in my pocket too.  This set up required the retro children's playroom chair with the legs sawn down due to the position of Auriga. I spent about half an hour checking the plethora of open clusters sprinkled in or near the Milky Way.  The sky was one of the best this season so it was a jewelled spectacle and the ED150 reveals such sharp colours enabling me to distinguish the cooler stars in some of the clusters particularly the occasional red giant.  As Monoceros reached the meridian I moved to the open cluster associated with the Rosette. Now, for all my efforts over the years, the emission nebulosity has eluded my eyes but tonight with this newish 6" frac I was somewhat taken aback to see a doughnut appear in the view.  Switching to a view with the UHC filter was nothing short of astonishing!  It wasn't just there; I was falling into its centre.  Texture, depth and dark globules were easily discernible.  The extent was slightly larger than the FOV with the 20mm so I slewed slowly around and the perimeters and varying consistency of the Ha emission were easily picked out.  I spent a long and happy time soaking this up; it was truly outstanding.  Thoroughly recommended.  I retired happily to the warm kitchen and toast.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.