Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Luna-tic

Our Observatory telescope

Recommended Posts

Our club meets at (and maintains)  a small observatory at what was once one of the county's high schools, and is now a middle school. The basis for the observatory was a science teacher's dream back in the 1960's, that became a reality through constant pressure on the local school board, lots of public support, and the diligent efforts of many volunteers who helped raise funds and actually build the observatory.

The centerpiece of this facility is a hand-built (including grinding the primary mirror) 10" f/9.2 Newtonian reflector on a custom made, powered, split horseshoe ring mount. It is mounted under a rotating dome on top of the observatory building. This telescope is referred to as the O.N. Rich telescope, that being the name of the gentleman who built and donated it to the observatory. His stipulations were that it be used to further astronomic education and be fully maintained in working order for the duration of the observatory's existence. The observatory was built over two years by volunteer contractors and a high school masonry class. The dome was constructed under direction and assistance of the telescope builder; the completed observatory was dedicated in October 1976.

I've lived within 5 miles of this observatory for 23 years, (both my daughters graduated from the high school where the observatory is located), and visited several times during the club's twice-monthly public viewings, but had never seen the Rich Telescope until last night. I'm a fairly new member of the club; last night was an especially nice viewing night, and we had a very large crowd (around 70 people) for the public viewing. It was decided to open the dome and utilize this scope for the occasion, and we used a 9mm Nagler EP to achieve 260x for viewing Saturn. The image is incredible; not only was Titan visible, but Rhea and Dione also, The Cassini division was clear, and if you had well-adjusted dark eyes, the Encke gap was barely visible; this was with a full Moon rising from behind the dome relative to our viewing direction . This telescope does not get a lot of use, but it stays in immaculate condition for a telescope built in the 1950's. I was shown how to open the dome doors, which use a worm drive from an electric garage door opener at the bottom and top of the arched doors, which open from the base to the zenith of the dome. The telescope's drive is rather unique; there is a movable plate that clamps to the outer azimuth ring; this plate has a toothed rack along its bottom, that engages a worm gear driven by an electric motor through a reduction system. This provides very accurate tracking on the azimuth axis; the geared plate must, however, be manually repositioned on the arch every hour, as the rack reaches the end of its travel length, in order to continue tracking for long periods. It takes about fifteen seconds to reposition this plate. Altitude axis is manual; the telescope is very finely balanced on this axis, and there is a friction control to help keep the set altitude. This alt-az mount operates like an EQ mount, as it is wedged so the azimuth can track in R.A.. To compensate for the rotation of the image over time, the tube can rotate in the mount along its long axis. A very elegant design for a home-built telescope.

Here are a few pictures from inside the (rather cramped) dome. Sorry one is slightly out of focus, the light was dimmer than it looks and my autofocus couldn't quite adapt:

DSC_0749.JPG

DSC_0754.JPG

DSC_0756.JPG

LMO telescope drive.jpg

Edited by Luna-tic
  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What an interesting looking instrument ! :icon_biggrin:

My astro socierty has a 12" newtonian of a similar vintage. The primary mirror on our scope started life in one of the lenses on the long range cameras that were used to film Queen Elizabeth II's coronation in 1953.

Our dome is a little cramped as well - especially when we have a visiting party of school children with us :icon_biggrin:

We could have an interesting thread on the various club, society and community telescopes that are still in operation :icon_biggrin:

Edited by John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely piece of equipment. I hope there's a step ladder for viewing at the zenith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I recall the split-ring mount was developed by Russel W Porter who also designed the horseshoe mount for the 200" on Mt Palomar.

BTW it's a true equatorial, not an Alt-Az on a wedge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, John said:

What an interesting looking instrument ! :icon_biggrin:

My astro socierty has a 12" newtonian of a similar vintage. The primary mirror on our scope started life in one of the lenses on the long range cameras that were used to film Queen Elizabeth II's coronation in 1953.

Our dome is a little cramped as well - especially when we have a visiting party of school children with us :icon_biggrin:

We could have an interesting thread on the various club, society and community telescopes that are still in operation :icon_biggrin:

It is interesting, not only the telescope, but much more about the construction techniques. As I mentioned, the entire facility was built with volunteer and student labor, and many things were done with budgetary considerations in mind. For instance, the track that the dome revolves on is wood framed, with  a steel runner hand-constructed; the dome rides on ball-bearing roller skate wheels along this track. They have never been replaced, only lubricated occasionally. I can easily push the dome with one hand and a part of my weight behind it. The telescope builder, Mr. Rich, was a carpenter and woodworker by trade, which at least partly explains the arches of the telescope mount being made from wood. The joinery is very beautiful and extremely solid. It's obvious he intended it to last. This observatory is the only free-standing high school observatory in the state.

Of note also, is the first "volunteer resident astronomer" for the observatory. His name was R.V Whitney, an acquaintance of Mr. Rich and a retired astronomer/lecturer from the Charles Hayden Planetarium, in Boston, Mass.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, DaveS said:

As I recall the split-ring mount was developed by Russel W Porter who also designed the horseshoe mount for the 200" on Mt Palomar.

BTW it's a true equatorial, not an Alt-Az on a wedge.

My mistake. I initially started describing it as an EQ, but after looking at the pictures decided it must be a wedged alt-az, because it wasn't oriented to North. After reading your post, I looked again; it most definitely is aligned to North, the position of the tube just threw me. The storage position for the tube is facing South, with the tube cradled in the horseshoe's "notch". Now that you mention it, one of our oldest members mentioned last night that the design was similar to Mt. Palomar. Maybe Mr. Rich copied it on purpose, don't know.

Thanks for the correction.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting scope thanks for posting. From some angles it looks like an artillery piece!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In any event it's a beautiful (In the way that only supremely functional equipment can be) telescope, and the high school are enviably fortunate to have it. I note the beautifully engraved RA setting circle on the split ring.

Edited by DaveS
Gramatical correction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice obsy... I wish we had something like this closer to home... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see these old scopes still in use, and performing well. A lovely piece of craftsmanship 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Paz said:

Very interesting scope thanks for posting. From some angles it looks like an artillery piece!

It does have a sort of cannon look to it,  like a coastal gun. We have another telescope in the club's "arsenal" that definitely looks like it could lob a big shell. It's a 25" f/5 Dob; it's supposedly the 4th largest privately owned telescope in the state. I'd love to see what 1st, 2nd, and 3rd look like. Below is a part of the club-owned scopes, including the Big Dob.

LMO 'scopes.jpg

Edited by Luna-tic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What an amazing scope. That mount must be rock solid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StarMich
      I'm aiming for the best possible field illumination for my Explore Scientific PN208 f/3.9 imaging newtonian. The scope is 5 years old now and while doing maintenance I wanted to do something about the design flaws as well.
       
      With the current secondary holder design it's impossible to center the mirror beneath the focuser. My question is: is this really an issue when the entire primary is visible? I read about optimal field illumination when the secondary is centered, but this isn't achievable with this telescope.
       
      I attached an image showing the (very bad aligned and already degrading) secondary at the moment. This is as far down as I can go, I would need to replace the holder screws with longer threads to go further but I don't know if it would make any difference for field illumination?
       
      Thanks in advance,
      Michael
       
       

    • By runway77
      Hello, I am having a problem with a relatively expensive flat field eyepiece in a combination with a newtonian reflector. I am unable to achieve proper focus with that eyepiece because when I focus it on axis, the edges are blurry. When I focus it at the edge, the center field is out of focus. I don't want to mention the concrete type of this eyepiece because I received it with a spot on the bottom barrel, therefore I cannot be sure whether it has been dropped. This eyepiece has very good reviews on this forum. Optically it looks good and there is no rattle. My question is whether these flat field eyepieces are usable with newtonians as these telescopes doesn't generally suffer from the field curvature. Many thanks for help.
    • By Anthony RS
      I'm selling my my 70mm secondary mirror I used with my 150mm F4 newtonian for 100$ (final price). Shipping expenses (from Beirut, Lebanon) on me for free provided I use LibanPost for shipping. We can discuss using other shipping methods and maybe splitting the cost.
      The mirror is brand new, still have the original package and box, bought the telescope a month ago and used only twice. No scratches, not even dust (images attached). Excellent mirror, no issues whatsoever, 94% reflectivity and optimized for the offset of f / 4 Newtons, but it can be used up to f / 5. It's from TS, made in Taiwan, original price is 134 euros (including VAT) excluding shipping and custom fees. Link below:
      https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p10673_TS-Optics-Newton-Fangspiegel-D---70-mm-mit-Halter.html
      It does not come with the tilt screws and center screw though unfortunately.
      I can also sell you the spider vanes (1mm thickness) for 6 inch newtonian for 25USD. Also brand new but without the tilt screws and adjustment screws. https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p11056_TS-Optics-Spinne-fuer-6--Newtons---164-mm-bis-180-mm-Tubus-Innendurchmesser.html
      Let me know if interested.
      Clear Skies!
      Anthony
      <private email address removed>
       



    • By WiltsStarGazer
      Having previously got some reasonable images by mounting a smart phone to the eyepiece. I thought I would try for a more sophisticated set up.
      So last night I tried to get some pictures of the moon using a Canon Eos D450 connected to a Skywatcher 130p Newtonian via a T2 connection on the eyepiece holder.
      As the camera has automatic focusing built into the lens I thought I would have to adjust the focuser on the eyepiece holder to manually get a sharp image.
      Basically the telescope acting as a manually focused lens for the camera.
      But no joy, I just got a bright light which seemed to fill the camera view finder. I tried various settings on the camera, adjusting ISO and aperture etc,  I also had some extention rings for the camera lens so tired fitting those to extend the focal length but no better.
      I sure there are many palms being slapped against foreheads reading this but as you can tell I have no idea, although I do have some of the gear.
      Any pointers and/or advise would be gratefully received.
    • By StarFiveSky
      Hi, I recently looked into telescope's & dso's again due to an interesting sight in the night sky 😉. 
      I wanted to get into telescope's etc... but my budget and other things got in the way. 
      This time there's no budget limit (that doesn't mean I'm bill Gates though).
      My main concern is size since I will carry the telescope with my bare hands (bag).
      I don't have a local astronomy club or telescope shop around so I don't know if an 8" Newtonian is too bulky/big. 
      Can someone post comparison pictures, if you have an 8" telescope (preferably newtonian, width and length)?
      Secondly I want to see dso's in the future (firstly beginner objects etc...) so the 8" is more adequate than the 6", but if an 8" is too big then I am okay with a 6" as long as it's much more portable. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.