Jump to content


Fitting a Baader Hyperion on a Olympus camera with Micro 4/3 mount

Recommended Posts

Here's a question from a happy astro-amateur from Denmark.

I currently own a Sky-Watcher Explorer 130/900 and I think about making a setup with that and my Olympus OMD E-M10 MKII for some astrophotography. The camera has a micro 4/3 lens mount. I have been using my scope for a couple of years though I'm very experienced but I am a complete novice when it comes to AP. 
I've read good reviews of the Baader Hyperion eyepieces and think that a 21mm would be nice and it has M43 and T2 photo threads.
So my questions are these:

1. How do I fit the camera on the eyepiece (adapter or not)?

2. Is the Baader Hyperion a good choice?

3. What will fitting the eyepiece to the camera do to the focal length of the eyepiece (should I go with another focal length)?


I know this is a lot and quite equipment specific, but hopefully someone has an opinion. :-) Thank you so much.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikkel

I'm no expert in AP either, but from time to time I do use an Olympus OMD EM5 ii camera with my refractors.

My usual setup is a micro four-thirds to T2 adapter on the camera, fitted with either a 1.25" or 2" nosepiece to fit the focuser on the scope.  There seem to be at least two versions of M4/3 T adapter available and, as I understand it, which type you need will depend on the degree of back focus available on your scope.  There's an example here:


It's probly easiest to try the camera initially without an eyepiece - ie for normal prime-focus photography - but once you've got the M4/3 T adapter for your camera, then you could try eyepiece projection by simply connecting it to the Baader T2 eyepiece adapter fitted to your eyepiece.  Very occasionally I use that method for lunar and white-light solar shots, with a 24mm Hyperion - although I understand that the 21mm is a slightly better eypiece, but I can't remember why, sorry!  Fitting the camera won't change the focal length of your eyepiece, but the camera will obviously see a larger image with a shorter focal length eyepiece.

Hope that helps.




Edited by Chinapig
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you should try prime focus AP first, with a T2 adapter (like the above one which I have the Baader-labelled one and recommend highly) and nose piece. I guess your current scope has 1.25" focuser not 2" so you will need a T2/1.25" nosepiece. Projection AP through an eyepiece is more targetted to smaller targets (such as planets) and more difficult IMO, but doable anyway.

With 900mm focal length, a MFT sensor already has a not so wide FoV of 1.10x0.83°, so I'm pretty convinced you actually don't want to do projection AP first. Since I image myself with a MFT sensor (Olympus E-PM1 before, E-PL6 now) you could have a look at my gallery and check what can be had with a short focal (130PDS = 650mm) and long focal (127MAK = 1500mm), while remembering your 900mm is about exactly between the two FoV-wise.

Finally a possible warning: many entry-level newton scopes have their focus "plane" not outside enough the OTA, barely enough for eyepieces and barlows but usually no more. Remember that for prime focus AP, you will bring the sensor to the focal plane with the focuser, not the reverse, so the focuser must rack inside enough. Given the MFT has ~20mm flange and the short T2 adapter is ~25mm long (from memory, I hesitate with 19mm), that's 45mm + optical length of the nosepiece that the focuser will have to compensate. Check this. A possibility to counteract this problem is to raise the primary mirror -- in a non destructive way (you will find some threads describing this), but then you will get some significant vignetting (this can be handled with flats).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again thank you so much for your help. I've been doing a lot of reading since, trying to get my head around how this actually works and specifically with my telescope. I Will definitely have a go with prime focus before trying projection. As I understand some people use a Barlow or powermate to both counteract the back focus problem and to have a "medium" magnification. Any thoughts on that? 


And again thank you for your kind and thorough replies  



Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By SuburbanMak
      My objectives on getting a new Skymax 127 were purely visual observing having parked imaging for a far-off time when I have time on my hands but, on taking delivery of a Baader Hyperion 8-24mm Zoom and fixed Hyperion 24mm 68 degree, I noticed a photo on the box and was intrigued..
      My DSLR hardly gets an outing these days with an iPhone camera always on hand but I thought it has to be worth a go so I ordered a Baader M43-T2 thread ring and a Nikon T ring to connect it all together, perhaps this could be quick and dirty way of getting into basic imaging at low cost. It all connects incredibly simply in seconds and although I'm only using the supplied SW plastic-bodied diagonal feels nice and secure when its on the 'scope.
      It makes quite a chunky load on the little AZ GTi mount but with the Vixen bar at its extreme balance point the mount performs fine at what I reckon is the very top end of its published 5KG payload. 
      Initially I just wanted to establish if there's a decently bright and focusable image that makes it to the CCD & given the absence of stars due to current weather and this being a bit of an operation to put together, a daylight test seemed a good idea.  I have a very handy church spire about 500m away (about the maximum possible distance from a church in Winchester) and poking it all out of an upper storey window in failing light on an extremely windy Saturday I captured the orb below on a  2.5 s exposure - (distance view included for scale, the spire is centre frame partially in the trees). 
      Verdict: focussing is tricky, as you can see, but on the Skymax 127 there's definitely plenty of leeway either side with the focuser which answered my initial exam question, it just takes some focus to focus!
      I've ordered the Baader heavy duty quick release system pictured on the box which should make this much safer and more practical  in the dark and cold, although it does make this not quite the bargain-basement option it is with just the 2 rings.
      Given the light & time limitations of the test Id say its definitely worth trying on nighttime targets, if the clouds ever clear...
      Will post any results up here but this looks like a really promising way of resurrecting a Nikon D90 that has been on the dole for a while (it shoots RAW video too!)
      Any hints, tips or suitable targets appreciated!

    • By Naraya
      I am very new to the world of binoculars and im gonna get started with Olympus 10x50 binoculars. My question is that will the Olympus binoculars handle weather in Switzerland (humidity above 80%), (high altitude), (cold temperatures)?  It would be really helpfull if i get the answer to that question.
    • By Red Dwarfer
      Hello everyone , 
      Does anyone know what focal length you get when you screw off the bottom 1.25 section of the Baader Hyperion 8mm ? Maybe somewhere between 14 and 18mm ? 
      I got it yesterday included in the extras with a SW 80ED , along with a SW 2" super deluxe barlow and the 28mm 2" LER kit lens .
    • By Skaikru
      Hello All,
      I am new to this forum and find this forum extremely useful. I have gone through almost all the threads requesting advice on the binoculars for stargazing and hopefully I will not frustrate someone for this additional thread.
      I live near San Francisco, CA, USA and in my early 30s. I am planning a trip to Bryce Canyon in 2 months. That place is supposed have very less light pollution and is recommended for Astronomy/Stargazing. I have bought the Sky Safari 5 android app to get me started into astronomy and hopefully I will continue this as a hobby for a long time to come. 
      I have decided to buy 10x50 bins and have found few of these below that are in my sub $99.99 range. I am looking for the best value for the $$ in this range. I will be carrying them in flight and will not be able to baby sit them.
      https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/421389-REG/Bushnell_120150_10x50_Legacy_WP_Binocular.html  - $84.99 - BaK-4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/917674-REG/celestron_71424_10x50_cavalry_binocular.html - $89.95 - BaK-4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof - Nitrogen Filled https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1086598-REG/celestron_71362_10x50_landscout_binocular.html - $74.95 - BAK4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof - Nitrogen Filled http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/binoculars/trooper-10-x-50-dps.html - $69.99 -($20 coupon) - BK-7  http://www.telescope.com/Binoculars/Astronomy-Binoculars/Orion-Scenix-10x50-Wide-Angle-Binoculars/pc/-1/c/5/sc/72/p/9333.uts - $102.99 - BAK-4 - Multi Coated (Considering because I read some reviews about quality optics and wider field of view) Please let me know your recommendations, if you have any.
      Thanks a lot
    • By StarryEyed
      For sale and in perfect condition.
      Original box, paperwork, protective bag and end caps.
      £70 includes signed for postage.
      Now £60 without postage.
      I have some photos if your curious and can take any you may wish.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.