Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

# Your simple mirrors are stranger than you think

## Recommended Posts

##### Share on other sites

I get more confused trying to figure out why mirror diagonals flip things vertically for refractors and CATs, but Newtonian diagonals don't do the same thing for Newts.  It seems like the same principle, doesn't it?

##### Share on other sites

Excellent explanation of the mirror paradox.

Regards Andrew

##### Share on other sites
On ‎16‎/‎09‎/‎2017 at 15:41, Louis D said:

I get more confused trying to figure out why mirror diagonals flip things vertically for refractors and CATs, but Newtonian diagonals don't do the same thing for Newts.  It seems like the same principle, doesn't it?

Interesting remark, Louis. I am going to rest a newtonian tube on a table, aim it at a landscape, and try various orientations of the focuser, plus various orientations of my head to sort this out.

##### Share on other sites

I think it's to do with even/odd numbers of mirrors. In the Newtonian there are two mirrors and each mirror flips the image once, so the image you see isn't flipped (though it is rotated 180°). However, a refractor with a diagonal has just one mirror (in the diagonal) and a catadioptric with a diagonal has three, so the image is flipped.

##### Share on other sites
1 hour ago, harrym said:

I think it's to do with even/odd numbers of mirrors. In the Newtonian there are two mirrors and each mirror flips the image once, so the image you see isn't flipped (though it is rotated 180°). However, a refractor with a diagonal has just one mirror (in the diagonal) and a catadioptric with a diagonal has three, so the image is flipped.

Rotated 180 or flipped, it still looks wrong terrestrially.  How many more mirrors would it take to make it look right side up and not flipped left for right?  Would they have to be oriented in a specific way like porro prisms (at right angles to each other) in a monocular?

##### Share on other sites

Don't forget a conventional astronomical refractor inverts the image about the optic axis !

Regards Andrew

##### Share on other sites

I put a newtonian tube on a table, facing an electrical post, a pine tree to the left, and a leaf tree to the right. With the focuser held vertically, I turned my back on the landscape, and saw everything "correct" in the eyepiece. Post is upright, pine tree to the left, leaf tree to the right.

Later I rotated the tube around its horizontal axis so the focuser went from vertical to horizontal, and sat at the standard place for looking through a newtonian: on the side. The post's bottom was first in the left part of the image, and when rotating the tube, the post's bottom turned from 9 o'clock to 12 o'clock.

Will have to try that with my little SCT. Funny that a newtonian does work as terrestrial scope, but only if you turn your back on your target!

##### Share on other sites
3 hours ago, harrym said:

I think it's to do with even/odd numbers of mirrors. In the Newtonian there are two mirrors and each mirror flips the image once, so the image you see isn't flipped (though it is rotated 180°).

But the main mirror reflects light along its optical axis, whereas the secondary does so 90° away from the main mirror's axis. This is tougher to represent in the mind's eye than I thought!

##### Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Louis D said:

Rotated 180 or flipped, it still looks wrong terrestrially.  How many more mirrors would it take to make it look right side up and not flipped left for right?  Would they have to be oriented in a specific way like porro prisms (at right angles to each other) in a monocular?

Has to be an even number for the same reason I mentioned before. You could do the Porro prism effect with 4 mirrors I think? (Edit: but this might cause distortions...)

Does anyone know how those 45 degree image erecting diagonals work?

Edited by harrym

##### Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, harrym said:

Has to be an even number for the same reason I mentioned before. You could do the Porro prism effect with 4 mirrors I think? (Edit: but this might cause distortions...)

Does anyone know how those 45 degree image erecting diagonals work?

They use Amici prisms that invert and revert as well as bend the light either 45 or 90 degrees.  I think inverting and reverting is the same as rotating 180, correct me if I'm wrong.  I have never grasped how Amici prisms work their magic, though.  The 2D diagrams fail miserably to explain what is happening in three dimensions.

##### Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Ben the Ignorant said:

I put a newtonian tube on a table, facing an electrical post, a pine tree to the left, and a leaf tree to the right. With the focuser held vertically, I turned my back on the landscape, and saw everything "correct" in the eyepiece. Post is upright, pine tree to the left, leaf tree to the right.

Later I rotated the tube around its horizontal axis so the focuser went from vertical to horizontal, and sat at the standard place for looking through a newtonian: on the side. The post's bottom was first in the left part of the image, and when rotating the tube, the post's bottom turned from 9 o'clock to 12 o'clock.

Will have to try that with my little SCT. Funny that a newtonian does work as terrestrial scope, but only if you turn your back on your target!

I think the old Zuka spotting scope used a single extra diagonal type mirror to send the image to your eye while holding the scope on your shoulder, bazooka style.  I assume the final image was upright and not reversed given it's use as a terrestrial spotting scope.

##### Share on other sites

I had never heard of that Zuka scope, Bing finds no picture of it, and Google finds only three, from the same Astromart page! Must be pretty rare; I'm not sure what kind of diagonal was added in order to use it parallel to the natural line of sight. I think we all need to work on our visualization skills!

##### Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Louis D said:

They use Amici prisms that invert and revert as well as bend the light either 45 or 90 degrees.  I think inverting and reverting is the same as rotating 180, correct me if I'm wrong.  I have never grasped how Amici prisms work their magic, though.  The 2D diagrams fail miserably to explain what is happening in three dimensions.

Inverting and reverting always gives an image that isn't reflected, but the angle of rotation depends on the positions of the mirrors/prisms relative to the direction you're viewing from. For example, a vertical Porro prism appears to rotate the image 180° (and reverses the direction of the light), but a horizontal Porro prism doesn't appear to rotate the image at all. This is highly counterintuitive but it seems to be correct. See the image below, and always imagine you're viewing the light coming towards you.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

• ### Similar Content

• By Pogo007
Hope someone with more experience than I, which basically means anyone that has successfully collimated a Newtonian, can answer a couple of compound questions I have based on my first and only attempt at secondary collimation of my SkyWatcher Flextube 250.
1) All three of my secondary collimation screws were extremely snug before I did anything and I was only able to comfortably turn them counter-clockwise.  Is this normal?  Do I need to loosen all three screws first before I can properly start collimation?  Should I be turning any screw beyond "snug"?
2) Before collimating, I placed a yellow sheet inside my OTA opposite my focuser tube and I placed a red sheet between my secondary and primary.  The view this gave through my focuser tube was of a red circle surrounded by a partial yellow ring (the secondary mirror stalk blocking a portion of this yellow annulus). While independently turning each of the secondary collimation screws counter-clockwise I looked down the focuser tube (both with and without a sight tube installed) expecting to see some change in the shape of the red area (more or less circular) and/or the yellow area (less or more even thickness).  I turned the screws no more that 2 complete revolutions.  I did not perceive any appreciable difference in what I saw and I turned each screw back (clockwise) to their original tightness before working with another of the screws.   Does it make sense that I didn't perceive any change?   Should I have turned the screws more revolutions?   Should I have loosened more than one at a time?
Very confused and looking for your help.  Thanks

• Hey guys.Its kronos here, and i m here with my Celestron firstscope.As you know ,its quite small with a focal lenght of 300mm.That means i can clean the mirros without unscrewing anything.What can i use to clean them that i can find in my house?Also can i use babywipes to clean them?

• I have just got a second hand Astromaster 130EQ. I want to say that i have collimated scopes before without the use of a laser but in this case i have 2 questions as this is so far out i cant see what i am looking at half the time. So hopefully you can help, thank you.
The secondary mirror fixing screw that hold the mirror and the collimation allen key bolts were so loose the secondary mirror had rolled facing the bottom of the OTE. In every other case the holding screw never needed touching and all i had to do were make small adjustments with an allen key, no screwdriver was needed. So this case is a whole different scale then any other collimation i have ever needed to do. You probably all know that i need to get the center of the eyepiece in line with the center of the mirror before can move on with this step.
Question 1
What is the best way to do this, shall i just eye it for now? (i have seen people measuring to the center of the eyepiece and then do the same with mirror but then i still dont know if the mirror is facing me directly.)

Every other time i have collimated a scope the mirror and scope were very low quality and just used for practice basically. The old scopes were used to see if i wanted to go further into this hobby which i definitely do. Any how the old scopes had a flat mirror and i could find the center by placing the mirror on paper and tracing a circle template. The thing is this mirror is concaved so any template iswill have to be pushed into the vurve (i think).
Question 2
So how can i center the mirror without placing it face down on a piece of paper which cant be a good thing?
Thank you. I hope i have not gone on to much, thank you for your patience in reading a long winded post.

• Heyyy its me again! Today me and my friend went out to observe! We spotted the moon and focused on it,took some okay pictures with my phone without an adapter( that means having to hold up my phone over the eyepiece 's tiny  hole). Then we tried moving towards mars, relatively close to the moon. It wanst a dot but like a small circle with some colour, afterwards we moved towards stars,but instead of seeing these circles with the secondary s reflection in the middle, we saw small circles (like mars but smaller) they were green blue and red coloured i didn't think much of it but then i checked the mirror. And i saw some dust.... Pics bellow.Is it the mirror or is this normal? Also if its the mirror, how do i clean it without removing it, i have a celestron firstscope btw.
Thanks.

• Hi! I am very new to SGL (just signed up a couple of mins earlier) and to astronomy as well, though I have been facinated with celestial bodies since I can remember.  I recently purchased a Celestron Powerseeker 127EQ but now I’m having troubles using it and I can’t seem to see anything through it. I also have a Celestron collimating eyepiece but I still can’t seem to make it work. Anyone here who has experience with the same scope? Would appreciate if we could chat a bit as I would be really interested in your experience and how you ultimately made it work!
×
×
• Create New...