# Your simple polarizing filters are stranger than you think

## Recommended Posts

• 3
##### Share on other sites

Okay. Attach the transmission-cables to my toes. While it won't necessarily qualify as "perpetual-motion," it should keep my head spinning for a very long time - as viewed from Earth <at least>.

Excellent piece, Ben!

Thanks!

Does It Matter?

• 1
##### Share on other sites

Strange stuff, I need a lie down

Alan

##### Share on other sites

I stopped watching cause it hurt my head - the "hidden variable" thing... :/

I did have a play in a spreadsheet though... isn't it just that transmission is proportional to the square of the cosine of the angle of filter N with respect to the polarisation angle of the incident light (in other words, the angle of filter N-1), or something like that? By introducing B, the light into C is no longer polarized as the same angle as it was when it left A, rather it's polarized at the angle of B, so the effect of C is different.

A + C = cos(45)^2 = 0.5

A + B + C = cos(22.5)^2 * cos(22.5)^2 = 0.85 * 0.85 = ~72%

##### Share on other sites

Sincerely, I have to watch it again a couple times before I can comment on it, folks! Because some phenomena are common doesn't mean they are simple or straightforward.

##### Share on other sites
• 3 months later...

I thought hidden variables had been discredited? No matter--this was fantastic. After the Paris experiments by Alain Aspect et al., Bell was asked what he thought the violation of his inequality portended, faster-than-light travel or non-locality? He opted for the latter interpretation. Here, at the end, they suggested that faster-than-light travel equated to non-locality. I wonder whether what I read had misunderstood John, or if such parsing is even meaningful? But WOW--how well done was that?

Thanks for this

As an aside, but maybe not quite as perplexing, Niels Bohr was fascinated with the western gunfight, but no matter how many times he tested, he could never get the first draw to statistically overcome the second. Itsa Fact

Edited by laowhoo

## Create an account

Register a new account

• ### Similar Content

• By knobby
Hi all, been doing some back space adjustments on both scopes and have a few filter / adaptors thoroughly stuck . What do you all use to 'unstuck' them ?
@mods, wasn't sure where to post this so feel free to move.
• By Corpze
Hi, I just published a video of how I am cleaning my filters - I thought I might do this while my telescope is back at service due to some kind of astigmatism.
How do you guys clean your filters? it seems that every dust particle finds it way to the filters just as you are done cleaning them, and to sit in a damp bathroom seems kind of a mess...

Anyway, here is the video
/ Daniel

• Selling the Astronomik 12nm clip in Ha filter for 120€. Bought it for 270 usd including vat, customs and shipping so it's a really good price.

The filter is still in excellent condition, used only twice. No fingerprints, no scratches not even dust (image attached).

I will also handle the shipping through my post office without cost. If another shipping method is requested, then we'll have to to discuss the price.

Contact me if interested.

Clear Skies,
Anthony

• SOLD
Selling the filter for 70€ . Original price around 230\$ (including shipping, vat and customs).

The filter is in excellent condition, used only 3 times. No fingerprints, no scratches no dust (image attached).

I will also handle the shipping through my post office without cost. If another shipping method is requested, then we'll have to to discuss the price.
Contact me if interested.

Clear Skies,
Anthony

• Hi all,
is there a best filter to use to view comet Neowise?

Many thanks!
Paul
×
×
• Create New...