Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements

    SGL 2017 SP

focaldepth

Questions about our new Quark setup, diagonals and suggestions.

Recommended Posts

focaldepth    69

Questions about our new Quark setup, diagonals and suggestions.

Hi All,

I've not been on here for a while and have hardly had a chance to the see the light of night this year.

Quick history. My wife, Averil(Yarn) decided she wanted to buy a solar scope set up. It had to be simple(ish) to use and without polar alignment hasels. We weighed up Lunt and Quark etc. and with a modest budget, finaly settled on and bought the following:

Quark Chromosphere.

SW Discovery Alt/AZ mount.

A handfull of SW plossls.

A few other bits to glue it all together.

The plan was to use my old ST80 (ex guide scope) So we got a TS Crayford focuser as well.


 

Now then, same old story, lack of back focus with the planned setup (or some would say front focus, depending in the minus sign).

Some measurements at infinity focus:

All with SW ST 80 + TS focuser + low profile (zero length) 2 inch to 1.25 inch adaptor

10mm Plossl + ST80 + SW cheap 45deg 1.25 prism = 41mm Draw tube

10mm Plossl + ST80 + WO 45deg 1.25 prism = 33mm Draw tube

10mm Plossl not possible with draw tube.

10mm Plossl +61mm extender (improvised) 73mm Draw tube = 134mm

Quark + 25mm Plossl = 69mm Draw Tube

Quark + 10mm Plossl = 72.5mm Draw Tube


 

Some Calculations:

SW cheap 45deg 1.25 prism = 134-41mm = 93mm optical length

WO 45deg 1.25 prism = 134-33mm = 101mm optical length

Quark = 134-72.5mm = 61.5mm optical length


 

Hence:

Quark + Diagonal < 134mm

Required Diagonal < 134 - 61.5 = 72.5


 

Finally my questions:

Do my calulations make sense?

Does any one know of a 1.25inch (or even a 2inch) 90deg diagonal with a total optical length of <70mm?

Any suggestions to convert this into a decent solar setup without breaking the bank?


 

Thanks in advance.

John (and Averil)


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sunshine    26

well i can't add technical feedback but i can say congratulations on your wife wanting a solar setup, where do you find wives like that? lol mine just complains and nags whenever i buy something new haha!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×