Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

EAA with UHC


AKB

Recommended Posts

Having, briefly, tried EAA with a 7nm Ha filter, I haven't been satisfied with the signal to noise ratio achieved within a reasonable time (say, 5 to 10 minutes) with 60 second subs.  I'm sure I"ll go back to this, but in the meantime I have been trying out an Explore Scientific UHC filter (because I happen to have one already.) 

Another warm night last night, with little moon, was a chance to try this out: Hyperstar, SX Ultrastar, UHC filter, and, because I was also going for some longer stacks, I used guiding (which, I must say, works a treat with my Avalon M-Uno mount.)

Three targets (only), all 10 x 1 minute:

  1. Cygnus Wall (well, some of it – terrible framing)
  2. Eastern Veil
  3. Crescent (poor focus here, I think: tried to re-focus without a Bahtinov mask – didn't work!)

Once again, sadly, I forgot the L-R flip required to orient the Hyperstar images...

 

NGC7000_2017.8.27_21_37_18.thumb.jpg.e1fd13be1f718de6efbab05e1c6be475.jpg

 

Eastern.Veil_2017.8.27_22_48_54.thumb.jpg.28cbde855521366ef927d600ad590586.jpg

 

Crescent_2017.8.27_23_31_43.thumb.jpg.30180ec255900c7ccec674b9f6a5e624.jpg

 

Just by way of comparison, here's a post-processed image of the Eastern Veil (31 minutes, just stretching and a bit of star reduction, with L-R flip) which I'm quite liking:

 

20170827_EasternVeil_UHC_31x1m.thumb.jpg.4eabb6b62f00792d031599fce1b8a081.jpg

 

I still feel I'm not doing well enough to grapple with colour yet.  It was a sort of resolution for this year to try and get things reasonably right in mono first.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your setup is working very nicely, some lovely captures. It would be interesting to see the difference with and without the UHC, but I would guess if it is a 'full fat' UHC, which blocks a lot of the visible range, then it should make a difference. I still like the sharpness and 'luminous' quality that black and white images deliver. :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RobertI said:

It would be interesting to see the difference with and without the UHC, but I would guess if it is a 'full fat' UHC, which blocks a lot of the visible range, then it should make a difference.

Thanks very much for your comments.  Since you ask, I happen to have a test sheet on this filter.  What I don't know, is whether there's any IR block there, because the camera has none, AFAIK.  I'll try the comparison sometime.

59a5a9eec2e54_UHCFilterTest.thumb.png.e34d97ccb40663bb3dafad52a7ddc863.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.