Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep3_banner.thumb.jpg.5533fb830ae914798f4dbbdd2c8a5853.jpg

appyaardvark

A quick Rosette in Narrowband, from a few months back

Recommended Posts

Good evening all,

It's been a while. Here's a quick Rosette for you, a work in progress...

 

NGC2237

NGC2237 - The Rosette Nebula
Constellation: Monoceros
Date taken: 30/11/16, 1/12/16, 19/12/16 & 3/1/17
Location: Bean, Kent
10 hours total exposure, 20 min subs; Ha:11, OIII:10, SII:9
Camera: QSI683wsg8, set point cooling -10°C, Astrondon Ha 3nm, OIII 5nm, SII 5nm
Scope: Skywatcher ED80 DS Pro
Mount: Paramount MX+
Guidescope: N/A
Guide camera: Lodestar2
The SkyX Professional, PixInsight, Nebulosity 4, Adobe Photoshop CC 2015

NGC2237.tif

Edited by appyaardvark
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice and smooth with great detail... love it

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question regarding the number of subs, for both narrowband and DSLR imaging, what is the the maximum number of subs one can realistically use, before there is no further benefit from adding more? Or is there no limit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's impressive. I love the detail and yeah, the colour too. I know its WIP but still I like as is :)

I look forward to seeing it progress.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I was quite surprised by the amount of detail captured. This is my first real attempt at narrowband imaging, I have a number of projects running in parallel, which I hope to share soon :-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Alfredo Beltran
      Hi
      This is my version of the Rosette nebula using the Hubble and taken with the ASI071 OSC camera. Telescope was a C925 EdgeHD with Hyperstar lens.

      Exposure time: 4hr 50 min in total at unity gain
      2hr 00 min (24 x 5 min) Ha
      1h 15 min (55 x 5 min) OIII
      1hr 35 min (19 x 5 min) SII
      This setup is awesome. A few years ago such an image just could’ve been taken with a monochrome ccd.
      Regards,
      Alfredo
    • By rgrickert
      Hello
      I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion that might help me
      My imaging set up is an RC reflector with an FLI proline 16803 camera and 50mm Astrodon filters (LRGB + 5nm narrow band)
      I have had a string of issues...everything from my mount had mechanical problems to my telescope had issues with the mirror cell to some family distractions...but at long last I seem to have everything working with the exception of the Astrodon Ha filter.
      Attached are representative 30minute subframes of the horse head and Pacman nebulae in Ha, SII, and OIII.  I get similar results with different objects although for bright, broad spectrum targets like M42, I will get data from the Ha filter (much as the stars shine thru on the HH and Pacman) although even that data does not comport with other imager’s Ha images of those objects. The LRGB performance appears to be normal.  My hypothesis is that this Ha filter is defective, perhaps not centered on 656.3nm
      I have contacted Astrodon and exchanged a couple of emails with Cary Chleborad seeking some help.  At first he claimed there was no issue because with enough manipulation some data could be extracted from the Ha. Later, when confronted with the other narrowband frames and the obvious difference to the Ha, at first he ghosted me, but when I said I would ask other imagers for help, he responded with a new position stating that because of the way the filters are made and their robust quality processes, it is impossible for the filter to be defective and therefore something else must be at issue.  He does not offer a suggestion of what might be the problem, nor is he interested in having me send the filter back for evaluation. Frankly, I’m more than disappointed given the premium I paid for Astrodon filters
      All that aside, and taking Cary’s position at face value, does anyone have an idea of what might cause this behavior other than the filter?  In a perfect world, does anyone live in the Austin, Texas area who would be willing to try my filter one night and see what they get with their equipment?
      The attached link is to the raw, uncalibrated files right off the camera.  I think a simple blink process in PixInsight will show what I’m talking about.
      I’m a little at my wits end, please help!
      https://www.dropbox.com/sh/60mvhzb717hdhnl/AACcAMkQdDsJuk1RU10PXvgja?dl=0
    • By knobby
      Hi all, my second attempt at imaging over multiple nights, captured 60 mins Ha and a couple of 5 mins on Oiii and Sii on Christmas evening, then added more Oii and Sii on the 30th
      Total of 60 mins Ha 25 mins Sii and 30 mins Oiii
      Hubble mapped - SII,Ha,OIII = R,G,B. The Oiii data was very noisy but I'm fairly happy overall, also the ZWO Oiii filter caused a massive ring around Alnitak when stretched !
       
      Comments welcome, I know it needs more data and I will need to learn to be more patient but the year is running out  🙂
       
      Thanks for looking and have a good 2020.
       

    • By B4silio
      I went to my family house in the countryside and was able to take some pictures during xmas eve.

      Total exposure: 6h
      H_Alpha: ~3h (730x15s) --> R, G
      Oxigen III: ~3h (710x15s) --> B, G
      I didn't have a view on Polaris and could not spend too much time drift aligning (it was xmas eve after all :D) hence the short exposures. Moreover I dont have the proper connection rings to put my flattener on my mono camera so all stars off center are a mess :_(.
    • By AstroRuz
      As new condition ultra narrowband 1.25" Baader filter. 3.5nm bandpass for nice small stars.
      Bought and loved it, but using a DSLR again and have no use for this filter.
      £140, can post.







×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.