Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_beauty_night_skies.thumb.jpg.2711ade15e31d01524e7dc52d15c4217.jpg

Astroblagger

Canon EF 400mm f5.6 L lens

Recommended Posts

I haven't used this particular lens but have used a Tamron 400mm f/5.6 lens with a KAF8300 sensor (4/3) and got good, coma free, narrowband results. I believe this lens has UD and super-UD elements -  if it's as well corrected and sharp as my 135L then you should be fine with broadband as well, especially at f/5.6. Also, at that speed I would think you'll be using it wide open so no issues with the lack of electronic coupling on the aperture.

Would you be using it with your 314L+? If so I can't see any problems with chip coverage :icon_biggrin:

 

HTH - Canon L glass is superb so I don't really think you can go wrong.

Yours, a very envious Rich ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a lens I always wish I had . It's probably one of the best wildlife imaging lens to own . I've seen very few Astro images with it but what I've seen looked great and never heard of coma problems . But it has a very narrow window FOV  so objects like M31 or M42 is quite big and won't fit in the FOV . So best is it's a great lens but not too choice for most Astro work . 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done, i now use the 100-400 L but with my 600D, but yes, it can be used with a CCD camera too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes I'd wish one of this too, but then I think that a proper scope is better. I have a Canon 300 F4 L and the resolution and colour correction are good. There is something inside which I think is tilted as the stars in 2 opposite corners are not exactly in focus. With image stabilization I don't think there's much you can do about this. The 400/5.6 doesn't have IS so it might be better in this regard. If I were you, I would ask myself how much I want it for daytime photography, otherwise I would consider the SW Esprit 80.

Good luck and clear skies,

Alex

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply's, iv had a mishap with my Atik 314L+, I basically lost the case it was in, (don't ask) but im now looking at an atik 383 or atik 460 mono to use with a filter drawer and a lens, im getting more into normal daytime photography and like the lightness of using a lens as I have to travel to my dark site to image. wonder would this be ok to use with either of these cameras?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.