Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_peoples_choice_2018_banner.thumb.jpg.f1bf2f8261e1689d19f116486df2bc89.jpg

steppenwolf

The Orion Nebula - a different processing technique!

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, steppenwolf said:

Now there's a great idea, how about the whole area from Alnitak downwards? Perhaps step out the Barnard's Loop and the Witch Head Nebula? Who is brave enough to ask the question of the lady with the sharp needle? :evil1:

Best methinks if that request was actioned by the telephone, just to be on the safe side.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a thought... Why not just make it all of Orion?   

Of course to allow for the resolution it would need to be a reasonable size - I think Olly/Tom's version ended up close to 8x2 metres(?), but I guess you might be able to get away with something slighly smaller... but it might take a few days longer :D:evil:

(I think we'll leave the lady with the sharp needles to you though...!)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great Steve - very interesting representation - your wife has done a good job on Orion !- I have been meaning to try out one those canvas printing systems which could render AP shots as a sort of impressionistic painting - this is better I think and a different way to present images that has artistic merit -but a lot of work!- regards Tony

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While we're in the business of upsetting the lady with the sharp needles I really feel you should suggest stitching at the eyepiece. What better way to record an observation? 😜 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, johnfosteruk said:

While we're in the business of upsetting the lady with the sharp needles I really feel you should suggest stitching at the eyepiece. What better way to record an observation? 😜 

In Greyscale John? :icon_biggrin:.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, johnfosteruk said:

While we're in the business of upsetting the lady with the sharp needles I really feel you should suggest stitching at the eyepiece.

I have just suggested this to Janie and without hesitation, she replied 'I'll stitch him at the eyepiece'. Now to be honest, I don't think she is talking needles here, I believe this is in relation to her famous 'Glaswegian Kiss' with the stitches to be applied soon afterwards. :eek:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, steppenwolf said:

her famous 'Glaswegian Kiss' with the stitches to be applied soon afterwards. :eek:

Now you lost me. I had to look that up, and something is lost in either translation or context. Got the "Glaswegian Kiss", but the "her famous" baffles me.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, wimvb said:

Now you lost me. I had to look that up, and something is lost in either translation or context. Got the "Glaswegian Kiss", but the "her famous" baffles me.

I too hadn't heard of 'her famous' Glaswegian Kiss. A google search didn't turn up anything so frankly I'm not intimidated Steve! 👀

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, barkis said:

In Greyscale John? :icon_biggrin:.

I think Janie should have a few green silks on hand for M42 Ron  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, johnfosteruk said:

I too hadn't heard of 'her famous' Glaswegian Kiss. A google search didn't turn up anything so frankly I'm not intimidated Steve! 👀

For Information Only John.
May I add, Mrs Richard is a sweet lady of gentle nature.
However, I've no Idea if the Incredible Hulk Syndrome manifests If she is riled :eek:.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headbutt

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, barkis said:


May I add, Mrs Richard is a sweet lady of gentle nature.

That fact was already evident from a previous thread started by Steve last year:

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, barkis said:

For Information Only John.
May I add, Mrs Richard is a sweet lady of gentle nature.
However, I've no Idea if the Incredible Hulk Syndrome manifests If she is riled :eek:.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headbutt

I'll not take any further risks then :)

because Janey is lovely, not for fear of the Incredible Hulk syndrome!!!!

 

more WIP please Steve. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, wimvb said:

Now you lost me. I had to look that up, and something is lost in either translation or context. Got the "Glaswegian Kiss", but the "her famous" baffles me.

By famous, I don't mean that Janie invented it, just that she is a master at delivering it - she often delivers her 'special kiss' when I am practising on my bagpipes ........ Generally, as Ron has intimated, she is calm, kind, gracious, gorgeous and controlled but when riled, the situation changes dramatically :confused1:

I do so hope that non-members can't read this thread ..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, steppenwolf said:

 

I do so hope that non-members can't read this thread ..........

We'll know when a new member named Mrssteppenwolf comments on this thread.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE 24/06/17

The project is in full swing and here we are two weeks in! The subtle colour changes that this technique relies on is clearly visible already - it's not all about resolution!

Orion_stitch_240617.thumb.png.c4911d4f377f0f585b46e5409cd71d2b.png

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like the Trapezium is coming along nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/06/2017 at 11:30, swag72 said:

How jolly interesting!!! I am looking forward to seeing this develop for sure!!! :) 

Surely, not developed these days, but processed ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, wimvb said:

It seems like the Trapezium is coming along nicely.

It certainly is!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick word - that may come in handy down-the-road:

I have an inherited vison-trait that is loosely called 'Monocular-Vison.' I use one-eye as the focus, while my other eye works as a range-finder. This shifts off right-to-left & left-to right dependent on which direction I am directing my vison. The result is that I can't see those silly 3-D movies in sillier-still glasses - Oh-Boo-Hoo-Hoo! I see in 3-D though, I'm quite capable of sensing depth and such - I just do it by a different means than others. As stated - this is inherited generation-to-generation.

I saw a good close-up of the Native Chief Quanah Parker - of the Comanche Peoples. A direct ancestor of mine. Sure enough - he too shows this if you look closely. One eye looking directly toward the subject being viewed, while the other is slightly drifted about as a range-finder.

So, as a result of my family-line, I am literally unable to 'connect-the-dots' and see a focused image from these cross-stitch works. But this in no way intereferes with my ability to see through a telescope. If anything, my seeing depth & contrast exceeds those without this genetic-trait.

Interesting, eh?

Dave

 

594ef7848e597_QuanahParker.jpg.1c3b6c27405e9c6db2aa1e08affb2a41.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second panel of twelve has been completed and it's taking shape nicely:-

stitch_040817.thumb.png.44d49e6fb54b5ed43939a9806fb996ce.png

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's REALLY impressive... The amount of work that's going into this is extreme to say the least - The mind boggles! 

(I bet the reverse looks a tad different?!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, AndyUK said:

(I bet the reverse looks a tad different?!)

Gotta be honest, the reverse ain't so pretty! :icon_biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Adreneline
      This is my first serious attempt at using my basic Sony A7 for AP on a WO-ZS71 mounted on the NEQ6.
      Individual frames were captured using Sony's own software and that is where I ran into problems - it has a mind of its own!
      Focusing using a Bahtinov Mask and Live View on the laptop seemed to work pretty well. The software then allowed me to take 9 x 10s and 4 x 30s exposures despite my best efforts to take 20 of each - it was not going to play ball.
      These 13 images were stacked in DSS without any calibration frames (I took flats but I judged them not fit for purpose and I wasn't too impressed with my Darks either!). ABE was applied in PI along with MLT noise reduction. The image was cloned and the original incrementally stetched with HistogramTransofrmation and the clone with Arcsinh stretch. The two resulting images were then Mask Layered in Photoshop, levels applied and a small amount of additional noise reduction.

      I think this A7 has some potential providing I can sort the Remote software and get myself some decent calibration frames.
      All comments and suggestions greatfully received.
      Thanks for looking.
      Adrian
    • By Kronos831
      heyyyyy its meeeee, kronosss and today there is a full moon(i missed out on the eclipse because of clouds... huh i guess i gotta wait another 19 years...)and i went out in the b ackyard with my 3" reflector telescope the celestron firstscope! The seeing was kinda bad... the full moon had less detail than the quarter.... anyway i figured i could see something else then i turned left and i saw orion(book-pun -intended) and the stars were quite faint(bad seeing full moon and light pollution.) i tried locating the orion nebula, after some time i stumbled across a small extremely faint smudge just barely distinguishable, then i turned and zoomed in,(75x) i saw 2 small kind of blurry spots of light (focusing wasnt great andi have the worst 4mm eyepiece in history...) with a very faint dark grey light around them keep in mind i saw that light when not looking directly at the nebula(read that it makes light appear brighter somewhere, it works lol)  sooo is what i am seeing indeed it? or are my eyes playing tricks on me?
      Cheers
      Kronos
    • By StaceStar
      Took this last night in a rare beak in the clouds, still a work in progress and the moon was close. it was also a bit of an experiment on how my L pro max filter would help with moonlight, the answer is...quite well actually! the rest of the moon glare was mopped up in astro pixel processor.
      55x60s, flats, darks and bad pixel map applied. stacked and processed in APP and final touch up in PS. 
      Still a work in progress and i'll add more data as and when i can

    • By Selborne
      Hi Guys,
       
      I thought I would share with you my first DSO taken with my new Orion 8" Ritchey Chretien F8 Telescope.  The frame is made up of 12 x 4min shots, no light or dark frames, using my Sony A7Rii camera.  The camera had the long exposure noise reduction switched on, which does help to reduce the total number of stars captured by the camera, as the Sony A7Rii does tend to overdo the number of stars captured.  The telescope was mounted on my trusty skywatcher NEQ6 mount and the guiding was via PHD 'of course' via my skywatcher ED50 guide scope.
      The shots were taken from my back garden in Stowmarket, Suffolk where I believe I am a Bortie 4 location, so the skies are mostly dark, with just a little light pollution from the main town, no filters used.
      My normal telescope is a Skywatcher ED100 Pro Esprit F5.5, which is an incredibly sharp scope, but with a wide 550mm field of view, great for capturing the whole of Andromeda but a struggle with smaller images like the Iris Nebula.  I will say the Orion RC scope did need to be collimated out of the box, which was a little disappointing, and it was not just a little out of collimation, it was a long way out, but with the use of a collimating tool, I soon had it dialled in.  
      First impressions of the Orion Ritchey Chretien 8" Telescope are fair, not super impressed, as it is nowhere near as sharp as my ED100 Esprit, but then this is to be expected based on price and telescope type, however, the pictures it has produced are pretty good, if you downscale the full 42MP from the Sony A7Rii camera, as can be seen in this picture.
      I purchased this 8" Orion Ritchey Chretien OTA mainly for Planetary work, but as yet I have not had a chance to 'get onto' a planet, fingers crossed some clear nights will arrive soon, so I can try.
       
      I welcome comments,
      many thanks
      Jamie

    • By Jannis
      After being sick for what feels like an eternity, followed by two weeks of clouds and wind, i simply could not just let this night go as it was said to be yet another week or two with clouds on the way.
      With my main scope not quite ready for use yet, i quickly hooked up the QHY5L-II-M to a canon 50mm lens, attached a 7nm Ha filter, and started looking for a decent target. I didn't need to look long before i saw Orion, and then it was set!
      As the moon is currently 78% lit i must admit i was a bit worried, but i think the end result turned out OK, especially considering the relatively little data of just about 1 hour.
      Exposure is 13x 300s (and 35x 30s for the core of M42) with the QHY5L-II at gain 12.
      The lens is a Canon 50mm F/1.4@F/2.8
      Darks applied to 300s exposures, but no flats or offset. Stacked in DSS, processed in PS and cropped to 16*9 size.
       

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.