Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_solar_25_winners.thumb.jpg.fe4e711c64054f3c9486c752d0bcd6f2.jpg

BobNJD87

Advice for easier tracking and finding objects

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I bought a Astromaster 130EQ two years ago and bought separately a celestron xcell barlow 2x and a Xcell LX 25mm. I now use my iphone to take photo's with a adapter.

However, I have trouble finding and specially tracking objects. Will an Goto system make this much easier? The next question is, should i stay with my astromaster 130 mm newt. telescope and invest in a goto mount like the skywatcher eq5 with synscan or can i better take an Nexstar 5SE? I am open for other suggestions

I want to make planetary pictures with my cannon camera (moon / mars / jupiter) if possible deep sky. However there is severe light pollution in my area. 

Thanks in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and a warm welcome to the SGL.

A little more information is needed before offering you advice. Are you polar aligning the mount before observing ? Are you aligning the red dot finder to the scope ?  I assume you do not have a motor drive, but if you do these procedures you should be able to locate targets and to track them using your slowmo controls.

I can not offer advice on AP as I am purely a visual observer, but I am sure others will be along to help with these questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The motor-drive system on a GoTo mount will usually outperform any add-on drive if that is what you are using so from that point of view, a GoTo mount like the EQ5 with SynScan would be an improvement but if you are thinking about imaging deep sky objects in the future, I would really recommend that you get a more substantial mount like the HEQ5 for its stability and tracking capabilities.

Imaging planets is a very different proposition to imaging deep sky and the tools require differ enormously! Planetary imaging requires a long focal length telescope to achieve the 'magnification' required and a fast frame rate camera to capture the moments of good seeing. Deep sky on the other hand requires a shorter focal length instrument for the wider field of views this will give and a camera capable of taking very long exposures. There is, however an interesting opportunity for using your Canon camera for both purposes - as it is for some deep sky imaging and by controlling it using the free software 'EOS Movie Record' which taps into the cameras live view feed for capturing relatively fast rate frames for planetary and Lunar imaging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And a camera lens could be used for the DSO as you can get some good old manual lenses second hand cheaply.

Is your light pollution so bad you have trouble seeing stars? Even with goto you will need to align it to use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the advice. 

I am using the tiny red dot finder, but it is not easy to pin-point objects with it. I can find Jupiter with it but smaller objects are tough. I start off with my 25mm and then zoom in by adding a barlow. But going to the stock 10mm or then even use it with a barlow is for me imposible. The field of vision is so small with the 10mm and a object is litterly going from side to side in a minute. Adjusting results in vibrations which makes my photo's unsharp. 

How do you guys track at high magnification? Are you continuesly using the slowmotion controls? Or do you have wideview eyepieces to increase the field of vision. And how do you get less vibrations during the tracking?

I think I will  focus on improving my tracking skills before investing in goto. I hope that the goto improves my photo's and gives me more time to enjoy viewing and making picture. 

 I do not want to heavily invest in it, so i forget deepsky. Also the sky conditions are not optimal. I live between two major city's and a area with a massive greenhouse industry which lighten ups the sky.

Edited by BobNJD87

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing to remember about "goto"! is that is only what it is. It should goto the target selected and put it in the field of view - within reason. After that it tracks where the target should be and in the path that the target should take. It does not "See" the target and so make corrections for drift.

To an extent there is nothing in all this that says it will apply the corrections determined for position to the tracking, seems odd but it is not given anywhere that it does. And being the distrusting whatsit I am I would not assume that it does.

An equitorial mount will simply forget the Dec drive and rotate only the RA drive at sidereal, so I see no correction being applied at all for the tracking aspect.

The big aspect is to get the initial setup and alignment as correct as possible. It is as ever the small aspects that make it - get the mount level, not approximately but accurately, get the polar alignment accurate - not sure how as the dial on the side tends to be large steps and questionable in accuracy anyway.

You ask:

Quote

astromaster 130 mm newt. telescope and invest in a goto mount like the skywatcher eq5 with synscan or can i better take an Nexstar 5SE?

Not sure what the 130mm actually is, I think one of those has a built in barlow and they are not good, concerning mounts then ultimately it is the EQ5 that you will want or need. They are the mounts for DSO imaging and the 5SE is OK for planets but there are not that many planets, there are lots of DSO's to go image. So taking the future into account then the EQ5 will be the more sensible mount.

Edited by ronin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By PlanetGazer
      I was hesitant to write this earlier, but I wanted to try all possible ways to get my new SkyWatcher 250P GOTO allgined, but to no avail.
      I have followed the instruction manuals of both the synscan and SW, and managed to get the message "alignment successful" multiple times on the handset or the app. The closest I got when I tried to dial a different star was a 20 to 25 degrees off on the azimth axis. Most times it's off by a margin on both axes.
      I have tried aligning around 30 times on more than 5 diffrenet occasions, different locations as well. I end up ignoring the thing and switch to navigating manually as the eager friends want to observe instantly, but we ran out of objectes and the planets are not close anymore, so I figured it's time to get deeper DSO's and sort out the GOTO.
      Here is what I do:
      • I level the scope to the zero reading on top of the base
      • I make sure the base is level with a spirit level I bought recently
      • I point the scope northish, but latley I bought compass to pinpoint north
      • I plug all equipments in and then switch on the power from a lead acid battery
      • I enter the date ( US fromat, month before day 😕 )
      • enter correct time zone obviously
      • the coordinates in the format of E 000 00 , N 00 00 
      • As for  elevation I use "my  elevation" app, not sure if it's accurate. Does this entry have to be that accurate?
      • I tried both brightest star and the 2 star align methods on the handset (which seems to be the same thing apart from the brightest method having an extra menu asking for which direction you are pointing at)
      I even used the synscan app and the synscan pro, and tried the 3 star align method. The app uses location and enters all data automatically
      •I use the top and right arrows as the last press before centring the star in the eyepiece as  recommended by the manual
       
      These are the steps I follow when I align , is there anythung I missed? Your kind help is much appreciated.
       
      Update: issue solved, check the reply in the second page
       
    • By Ceebee58
      Newbie , bought a skywatcher Capricorn ( around £100) but still unopened as I have some unexpected money and wonder what to do .
      options I see are ; 
      Use the Capricorn and get to know the sky and how to align the eq mount. Move on if I get the bug , maybe get a couple of better eyepieces.
      Return for refund and choose one of;
      Use my approx £350 budget to get a 90+ aperture scope .
      Blow the budget on an entry level GOTO scope , don’t bother learning stuff but just observe.
      What would you do ? To be honest I think the learning thing is part of the fun but GOTO scopes seem to be the ‘in’ thong
       
    • By Oslet
      Sooo...I'm getting quote frustrated here. This spring I tested my HEQ5 with guiding. The synscan controller was connected to the computer trough the USB plug on the hand controller. This worked like a charm in my living room. On the new controllers you dont need the rs cable. But when I tried the whole thing with guide cameara for some live shooting, it just did not work. I get something wrong with the com port in decice manager, driver not working. I have tried 3 different drivers. The whole thing responded, connected and was guiding when i did a dummy test before the summer. So setup is pc-synscan via usb for pulse guiding. Can it be a problem with windows 10? What t h.... just happened? Where can I find a driver that works? And believe me it worked 5 months ago, argh. Thanks for any respons and support
    • By Corne de Klerk
      Hi Everyone. Hoping you can guide me in the right direction or give some advice. 
      I was given a Celestron Astromaster 70AZ telescope as a gift and have so far managed to locate and view Jupiter with an Android app. 

      I subsequently came across a youtube clip were the guy demonstrated on how to add a DSLR / mobile phone adapter to his telescope as a way to converting his budget telescope to a push / go-to by clipping his mobile phone on top of his telescope and using the star finder app, be able to locate his target and then using his finder scope.  Please note that I am not trying to Astrophotography (yet).
      However, I am unable to find any mounting clips / mobile phone adapters I can buy to add onto my telescope. Any suggestions or ideas how I can make this work? 

      Below is what I mean on how I want to attach my mobile phone on top of my telescope.
      Your help will be appreciated!

      AC
      South Africa


    • By Michele Scotti
      Hi everybody,
      i'd like to share with you the design, making and progress of a project my astro club endeavoring to. I'll post here relevant info in a run-up  to where we got to so far.
       
      Here is the mission: 800mm in diameter. That's it. A lot of inspiration out there but it needs to be able to do science. So it's a relatively fast Newtonian capable of tracking for tens of minutes.
      So we realized that we were facing 2 projects in one. The mirror on one side and the mount on the other. Shall we start with the mount? What's the best compromise in terms of ease to build and cheap components and the chance to have a stiff yet light structure. An alt-az, like the biggest telescope! - or rather a glorified dobsonian in this case.
       
      Ambitious? Definitely
      Any comment/suggestion is welcome!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.