Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Galaxy blues with CLS and UHC filters..


Recommended Posts

It has taken me ages to work it out but I have discovered that using uhc or cls filters give my galaxies a pinkish colour and any blues i pick up when imaging without filters are absent when using them. 

Does anyone know of any processing tips to regain the blues or should i just image without and reduce sub length and/or ISO. I have tried altering colour balance and boosting colours but those blues seem well hidden or missing entiely.

I use a dslr (modded) for imaging. As i said, the modded camera without filters is ok but as soon as i add a filter the blues go...

All workrounds and solutions gratefully received!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recommend not using any filters except for the UV/IR blocker. 

I attempted to image galaxies through a Neodumium filter and a LPR filter, thinking that LP cut would allow longer sub exposures and would enable me to capture more faint galactic glow, but the opposite was the case.. actually I end up with better images of galaxies just using the UV/IR filter with shorted exposed subs but more subs stacked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, StargeezerTim said:

uhc or cls filters

Hi. Yeah, same here. They're too strong to be able to colour balance and cut off galaxy light wavelengths anyway. I went back to using a moon and skyglow; almost neutral colour balance out of the box whilst still removing the light pollution mush.

May I also offer the article impossibility of colour balancing with a filter?

HTH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes the filter will make your images take on a red tinge. 

I take 'luminance' with the filter in place at a high ish ISO, I then convert the image to mono and process it accordingly. This will get me my contrast. 

I then gather colour data separately without the filter in place at a lower ISO and blend the two images together using photoshop. 

So it essentially takes twice the time to do but you get your result. I have never managed a satisfactory color balance for galaxies with the filter in place and trying to process it out. Maybe if I had Pixinsight it could fix it???? With dynamic background extraction...Not too sure though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Adam J said:

 

So it essentially takes twice the time to do but you get your result. I have never managed a satisfactory color balance for galaxies with the filter in place and trying to process it out. Maybe if I had Pixinsight it could fix it???? With dynamic background extraction...Not too sure though. 

I'm no expert but I use DBE in the LE version. It does a great job with gradients but doesn't really affect colours or colour balance, not by design anyway ! (it sometimes messes up colour balance but it is easy to change it in PS). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.