Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

I am new to this forum and find this forum extremely useful. I have gone through almost all the threads requesting advice on the binoculars for stargazing and hopefully I will not frustrate someone for this additional thread.

I live near San Francisco, CA, USA and in my early 30s. I am planning a trip to Bryce Canyon in 2 months. That place is supposed have very less light pollution and is recommended for Astronomy/Stargazing. I have bought the Sky Safari 5 android app to get me started into astronomy and hopefully I will continue this as a hobby for a long time to come. 

I have decided to buy 10x50 bins and have found few of these below that are in my sub $99.99 range. I am looking for the best value for the $$ in this range. I will be carrying them in flight and will not be able to baby sit them.

Please let me know your recommendations, if you have any.

Thanks a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult to say one over the others. I have a set of Bushnell's, not the ones you give but the Natureview Roof Prism set at 8x42. They are very good, also have the H2O's in 8x42 and they are good but not up to quality the Natureviews. Say this as the Naturviews at the site given are $103. And looking at the others these just match the top priced one you give, well $1 more.

Think Bushnell have updated the front objective covers, really they had no option as they were the biggest joke ever. But the binoculars are good. Maybe better say were good, they mau have a different source now.

Porro prism binoculars are said to be better, one lump of glass rather then two, but I cannot fault mine.

Apologies for having thrown another option into the consideration. You will not find any real difference between 8x42 and 10x50, and the 8x42 market has more and greater competition so you could get better optics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope I don't sound too much like a politician by not answering your question directly ! But I don't have hands on experience of the Binoculars you've listed. But I would like to provoke a little lateral thought too if I may ?

@Mrs Racey and I have 10x50 and 8x42 (and a pair of 8x32) Binoculars (as well as a pair of 20x60). 

More often than not, and particularly when we hike or fly away, it's the 8x we reach for. 

There are 3 reasons for this. 

1) Convenience. Size and weight. 

2) Although we can hand hold the 10x50 easily, the 8x are that bit easier. 

3) Field of View. At 8* the 8x provide a wonderful wide field vista. 

I'd consider auditioning a few pairs at that magnification level too. 

I won't drone on about which we use in detail as ours are a little outside your stated budget but those we use currently are:

Swarovski 8x32 EL, Hawke 8x42 Frontier ED, Pentax SP 10x50 WP and Pentax SP 20x60 WP. 

As I say, in all instances of hiking or flying it's the 8x that are reached for...

Hope you find something. 

(By the way, Bryce and Zion Canyons are sensational both by day and by night... ?)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skaikru welcome to SGL. I have a son and his family living in Livermore so I know your location very well. If you want binoculars solely for astronomy you may also wish to consider some 15x70 binos - Celestron make this size and are very reasonable in price.

I took a pair of 15x70 and 8x32 to Yosemite for astronomy and using the larger binos just gave so much more in resolution. The delights of Scorpio and Sagittarius were incredible.

I am sure there is an astronomy shop near San Jose - is it worth a visit to try different binos to see which suits you best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ronin @Racey Makes sense. I hike a lot too and would like it to be easily portable. If what I see through 10x50 vs 8x42 are almost the same, I don't mind going for the smaller one. I read a post here which said 50mm gives 40% more light/stars and will give a feeling of floating in space, which made me decide on 10x50. Also, one of the website showed how a Galaxy will look through 10x50, it was already tiny and thought lower mag will make it just look not nice. 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mark at Beaufort said:

Skaikru welcome to SGL. I have a son and his family living in Livermore so I know your location very well. If you want binoculars solely for astronomy you may also wish to consider some 15x70 binos - Celestron make this size and are very reasonable in price.

I took a pair of 15x70 and 8x32 to Yosemite for astronomy and using the larger binos just gave so much more in resolution. The delights of Scorpio and Sagittarius were incredible.

I am sure there is an astronomy shop near San Jose - is it worth a visit to try different binos to see which suits you best.

@Mark at Beaufort thanks! I think that's a good idea. Let me see if I can visit a store.

15x70 will be large I think and I will also need to carry a tripod or monopod. I also have a DSLR that needs space in my bag when I fly. Will go to a shop and see how much of a difference in size they are to 10x50 and 8x42. Larger aperture and mag will surely be a delight if I can carry them around and fly easily. Also, going to Olympic National Park and weather permitting, would like to use the bins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who wears glasses, an important point for binoculars is the eye relief (how far 'behind' the eye pieces can you still see the full frame), I look for at least 17-18mm - this is something best checked by looking through them in a store. From what I've read, the best astro bins for handholding are either 7x50 or 8x56 - however both of these are kind of specialised and may be expensive. This really leaves 'general purpose' bins of 8x42 or 10x50 options - I have a pair of ED 8x32 roof prism bins but my 10x50 porros are much better for astro. I also have a pair of 15-80x70 zoom bins - ignoring the zoom bit - they are good 15x70 bins but heavy to hold up and hard to hold still.

Best advice is to visit a store and compare a few pairs (outside if possible) and try to buy the best you can afford (within reason). My preference would be 10x50s - mine are Nikon Action EX (waterproof, nitrogen filled, armoured, spin up eye-cups etc.) which I feel are very good but the objective lens covers often fall off.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎29‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 16:49, Skaikru said:

@ronin @Racey Makes sense. I hike a lot too and would like it to be easily portable. If what I see through 10x50 vs 8x42 are almost the same, I don't mind going for the smaller one. I read a post here which said 50mm gives 40% more light/stars and will give a feeling of floating in space, which made me decide on 10x50. Also, one of the website showed how a Galaxy will look through 10x50, it was already tiny and thought lower mag will make it just look not nice. 

Thanks

8x40's and 10x50's might not be that different in hiking but the advantage of the extra magnification and diameter is clear in stargazing. I do own an 8x40 as well as a 10x50, and I have tried all those my friends and visitors brought to observing sessions. 10x50 shows more stars in clusters, and the amplification is the same with nebulas and galaxies.

Hiking doesn't show the difference that much because sunlit scenes are saturated with light, whereas stargazing never has too much light, nor even enough light. Thus, always go for the larger lenses in nighttime viewing. I prefer to separate problems, so I use my 8x40 for Earth, and my 10x50 for space. Last week I had trouble identifying a moving red light as a thai lantern through the 8x40, but the 10x50 removed the doubt.

Edit: I have not tried them personally, but the Scenix and the Legacy have the best reputation among those you mention.

Edited by Ben the Ignorant
incomplete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29 May 2017 at 15:49, Skaikru said:

@ronin @Racey Makes sense. I hike a lot too and would like it to be easily portable. If what I see through 10x50 vs 8x42 are almost the same, I don't mind going for the smaller one. I read a post here which said 50mm gives 40% more light/stars and will give a feeling of floating in space, which made me decide on 10x50. Also, one of the website showed how a Galaxy will look through 10x50, it was already tiny and thought lower mag will make it just look not nice. 

Thanks

Ever heard the saying: There are lies, damn lies and statistics!

10x50's will gather 40% more light, but they also give a bigger image that is 1.5625x bigger so the effect in simple numerical terms is the image is a little dimmer. So we are at the "statistics" bit of the lies.

You will not see any galaxy as anything other thenm a faint grey smudge, well maybe a bit more if it is really really dark. M31 will be the best and not sure if that will be high enough in CA, it has disappeared here for viewing but you would be a bit further South. None of the rest will be of any significant impact.

Would say that you will not realistically tell the difference between 8x42 and 10x50, everything tends to just about cancel each other out.

I never like suggesting binoculars for astronomy, I use them a lot but the final "use" is different. One way of putting it is "Binoculars are for looking around, a scope is for looking at."

If it has to be binoculars then ultimately your decision, jsut (in my opinion) make sure you want to look around the sky and not look at an object. If you wanted an inexpensive scope, fully manual and a reasonable option I would suggest you look at the ES Firstlight AR80640 appears to be $149:49. Not sold here so I have no real information on it, but it appears  to be a reasonable item. 80mm is OK as a start and the 640mm focal length is neither fast nor slow. I notice it does not mention eyepieces. Bit strange, so you may have to get one or two. Suppose a 25mm or 30mm plossl and say a 12mm plossl.

AR80640

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, ronin said:

10x50's will gather 40% more light, but they also give a bigger image that is 1.5625x bigger so the effect in simple numerical terms is the image is a little dimmer. So we are at the "statistics" bit of the lies.

It is true that 10x50s have a 5mm exit pupil and the 8x42s have a 5.25mm exit pupil so the image should appear a little brighter.

However the extra resolution of the larger aperture will allow it to show more stars and a little more detail, plus the smaller exit pupil can be a benefit under all but the darkest skies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Clear Skies!
      I have Celestron AstroMaster 130 eq. I know how to attach the motor driver, too. I want to dive into astrophotography. But I don't know:
      How can I accurate polar align my telescope, if it doesn't have any polar scope? I think drift polar-alignment is very hard. Is there any other way? How fast must be the motor driver's speed if I don't have polar-aligned telescope yet? I am buying my new Orion StarShoot G4 Monochrome Deep Space Imaging Camera. Is it good that I attach Orion camera on Celestron telescope? I want to buy ZWO 1.25" LRGB Imaging Filter Set. Is it good to attach ZWO on Orion and Celestron? Is it a good choice to select these machines? And finally: is Celestron AstroMaster 130 eq telescope good enough for astro imaging? (I want to image DSO objects.) Thank you for your effort and time.
      Clear skies!
    • By hazza001
      Hello everyone, 
      I'd say it's been about 6 years since I last posted on this forum, oops 😁. 
      Anyway Ive been looking for a new scope something with abit more punch than the skywatcher 130m I have been using and came across this beaut on eBay, I won the auction and picked it up yesterday. The guy was selling it on behalf of an elderly gentleman man who couldn't use it anymore, (it's been sitting in an unheated garage for many years 😩) he had no idea on the make or model other than its a c8, I did a bit of research and found its a c8 super polaris. 
      The mount has both RA and Dec axis motors but I have no way to power them, the action of the mount is buttery smooth. However I plan to mount this on my HEQ5 anyway... 
      The scope its self seems to be in good condition some minor scratches on the tube but nothing too alarming, no finderscope or dust cover but I plan on adding my own finder anyway. The focus is super smoothe and can't see much if any image shift in use (not tested on a star yet due to preverbial clouds) 
      My main concern is as its been in an unheated garage for some considerable time and there seems to be some minor mildew on the primary which I plan on cleaning... when I feel brave enough.. 
      I don't think the secondary screws are original, should be Phillips head? Tested on a small light down the garden and it seems to be well collimated, but does have a small amount of mildew on it
      I don't recognise the mounting bar, I would like to swap it to a vixen style bar so I can mount it on my HEQ5 maybe this?
      Anyway that's where I am with it sorry its been so long since I last posted, I hope to be a tad more active on here. 
      Harry 



    • By Viktorious
      Time for yet another cry for help when it comes to choosing diagonal. I have read the many similar threads and gathered some knowledge (too many to start linking). I have come some way in my process and now that it is coming to final decisions I would like to hear from the experts. Not many of threads I have read end with the OP returning to deliver some review/verdict of his/her final decision. While I wait for response on some thread where I asked about the result, the eagerness in me forces me to write my own thread. Perhaps some of the people asking these questions before can now answer in my thread as experts!

      I have the Nexstar Evolution 9.25 and am currently using the stock diagonal. My eyepieces are the Baader 8-24 mm zoom and the stock 40 mm Plössl. I would also like to upgrade EPs and there I'm looking at something better in 24 mm range, as well some nice low power for more FOV. I'm following threads about EPs and SCTs with great interest for this (on CN). Can say that I'm currently leaning towards the 1.25" 24 mm ES 68° and 2" 36 mm Hyperion aspheric (if going 2" route).

      I'm thinking 2 alternatives (including a budget alternative for one of them). I'm looking at Baader mainly for ClickLock (and expect good optics):
      Baader T2 Zeiss prism with a 1.25" ClickLock EP (T2 part #08) -OR- the 2" prism with 2" ClickLock (splurging that is). The budget alternative would be to get the non-Zeiss T2 prism instead for the 1.25". Worth noting that I would like to get the Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector. This would be for future purposes of delving into EAA but of course I would use it visually as well (especially if choosing the T2 route). The reasoning for my alternatives:
      Go for the 2" Zeiss prism to theoretically get the best of the best in visual terms. I would make better use of the 46 mm baffle tube opening. Theoretically possible to combine with the R/C thanks to relative short light path (although not necessarily needed with 2" EPs). Downside of going to 2" accessories would be the cost, EPs, filters etc., on top of diagonal. Would not be able to spend all these costs at once. Cheaper route with T2 prism (especially the non-Zeiss), not only diagonal but also the other accessories. Cost of the R/C would be comparable to e.g. the 36 mm aspheric and give similar power and FOV with the 24 mm ES, i.e. the 24 mm would act as both. Extra plus is the ClickLock clamp for 1.25" with built in fine focusing not involving the mirror. Downside of knowing that not all light coming out of baffle tube is used. To get the wide FOV (24 mm + R/C) I'm adding glass to the optical train (theoretically not a good thing). I'm leaning towards the T2 as it would be a cheaper diagonal and for EPs I would only need the 24 mm and then the reducer instead of a 30-40 mm, so saving the expense of one EP. Then I would already have the reducer for continuing into EAA. The questions I hope the experts here can help with:
      The old reducer vs 2" diagonal question. With R/C and the 24 mm I can get roughly the same mag and FOV as e.g. the 36 mm Hyperion (technically 38 mm vs 36 mm and 68° vs 72°). Also reading good things about the ES 68° and with R/C the EP should behave the same. Am I missing something here? The logics say that the I would lose some contrast with the R/C (not using full opening + adding elements), correct? Possibly flatter fields though (not important now, hopefully the EP threads might tell soon enough). The Zeiss vs non-Zeiss T2? Big differences? I have read a few posts on this so most to get some updated views here (have read that Baader has changed some things over the years). Using the R/C (f/6.3) with these prisms. I know f/7 is mentioned as "the limit" but also remember BillP's test where he was happy down to f/6 with the prisms (in 2014 at least). Perhaps most important: have I missed some other obvious alternative here? Maybe I have forgotten some question here but perhaps for the best as I assume those who have gotten this far are tired of reading now. Thanks for getting here though!

      Thanks,
      Viktor
    • By ssuummoonnaa
      Hi, I have recently bought the celestron AM 130 EQ. when setting up , I wrongly assembled the counter weight first rather than adjusting the lattitude knob both at the front and rear side. That made the counter weight pull towards the floor and now the lattitude adjustment knob is jammed, I cant move it counter clockwise. The pin at lattitude is showing 0 degree. What to do. Please help. 

    • By dragorom7
      Hello, i am new to this forum, i made my account here because i need help.
      So few weeks ago i ordered a USB to Serial cable to be able to Control my Telescope with my computer using stellarium.
      It arrived today.
      So i made my Star Alignment, then i plugged the cable to my Telescope and Computer, i installed the Cable driver and ASCOM Platform + ASCOM Celestron Driver.
      I started DriverConnect.exe and put the Celestron Driver i downloaded, and did the properties informations ( had to tick on "Advanced Setup" and "Show All COM Ports" ) and i put "COM8" on "COM Port", then i pressed "OK" and then "Connect"
      Result:
      Create              Creating device
      Connected           Connecting to device
      Error               System.Exception: Connect to COM1 failed, no Celestron scope detected
         to System.Dynamic.ComRuntimeHelpers.CheckThrowException(Int32 hresult, ExcepInfo& excepInfo, UInt32 argErr, String message)
         to CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , ComObject , Boolean )
         to ASCOM.DriverConnect.ConnectForm.btnConnect_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\ASCOM Build\Export\ASCOM.DriverConnect\ConnectForm.cs:line 268
      Dispose             Disposing of device
      ReleaseComObject    Releasing COM instance
      ReleaseComObject    Completed release. Count: 0
      GC Collect          Starting garbage collection
      GC Collect          Completed garbage collection
       
      "Connect to COM1 failed, no Celestron scope detected"

      In Stellarium i set-up everything, the plug-in and restarted the app, then added my telescope  and i says it's "connected" but i can't find my telescope.
       
      Telescope:
      Celestron NexStar 127SLT
      The Cable i bought:
      https://www.amazon.com/Telescope-CP2102-Adapter-Control-Console/dp/B077G37VL1/
      PC Specs:
      Windows 10 Pro, GTX 970, 8GB Ram(DDR4), i7 6700 3.4Ghz
       
      Looking forward for your help, thanks in advance,
      dragorom7.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.