Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Welcome to Stargazers Lounge

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Announcements

    sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_jupiter.jpg

     

Knighty2112

Celestron Nexstar 6/8SE Goto mount first light

29 posts in this topic

After collecting my new Celestron Nexstar 6/8SE Goto mount off Parallaxerr last Tuesday, I got a brief chance tonight earlier on to give it a brief first light. So, here is a brief summary of how things went. The scope I used on the mount was my Celestron 4SE Maksutov;

Setting up. Compared to my other Goto mount (Skywatcher Stardiscover AZ Goto mount), getting the mount levelled and set up was much easier. Trying to do this with the other Goto mount can take some time, especially when trying to fit the top Goto part to the mount itself in the dark, which requires a torch and some patience to get the securing screws located correctly. On the Celestron mount you can do this very easily, with notches in the top of the mount to allow easy alignment with the securing screws.

Alignment. As there were quite a few clouds in the sky, I went for the quickest alignment that the Celestron mount offers; one star alignment. Not expecting much after the initial alignment on Sirius, I was pleasantly surprised. After taking the tour option to look at some double stars, planetary nebula etc, all objects appeared in my 20mm EP fov. I then used the Constellation tour, and looked at objects in Auriga. M36, 37 & 38 fell nicely in the fov also.

Looking forward to doing a three star alignment as soon as weather permits, so I will do a more detailed report when possible. From just a brief hour session using just one star alignment if this mount can get most things in view doing just that then it should perform even better when a three star alignment is performed. :) 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you store your mounts with the head separate from the base tripod? (not sure what you meant by 'Trying to do this with the other Goto mount can take some time, especially when trying to fit the top Goto part to the mount itself in the dark'.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

13 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Do you store your mounts with the head separate from the base tripod? (not sure what you meant by 'Trying to do this with the other Goto mount can take some time, especially when trying to fit the top Goto part to the mount itself in the dark'.

No, I keep the mount and the top Goto part together, however I do need to take the top Goto part off the mounts to level the mounts with a small boat level, then re-attach the Goto head part. I am going to source a small button level that I can fit under the battery cover on the Goto mount that will hopefully mean that I don't have to separate the mount and the Goto head part to do this levelling.

Edited by Knighty2112

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use two star alignment did you ever try just setting the tripod as best as by eye and seeing how the GOTO responded accuracy wise?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

If you use two star alignment did you ever try just setting the tripod as best as by eye and seeing how the GOTO responded accuracy wise?

Two star alignment on the Skywatcher Goto mount was OK if you kept in the same area of sky, but got much worse when you went the further away from the initial alignment etc. This was regardless of how level you got the mount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The manual for the v3 synscan for AltAz does say pick stars within a certain distance of each other and alititude range, I guess that might then lead to less accuracy when a full 180 degrees away.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

The manual for the v3 synscan for AltAz does say pick stars within a certain distance of each other and alititude range, I guess that might then lead to less accuracy when a full 180 degrees away.

Yep. I need to try to an alignment with much further separation I guess. However, the Celestron Goto seems to have coped much better with just one star alignment, even when I then went to parts of the sky that where 180 degrees away from the initial alignment star Sirius. If that proves to be the case consistently then it will be the Celestron mount that will be my de-facto Goto mount from now on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear that your mount is performing well. I use my Nexstar SE for short exposure DSO astrophotography (FL≤700mm) , and I find it a reasonable performer, not perfect, but acceptable. May be the more refined EVO mount would be better, but it costs too much to consider replacing the SE, just to find out. I only ever do a 2-star manual alignment, with one of the chosen alignment stars near where I want to image. Normally I'd expect the mount to place the target pretty close to the centre of the frame and to keep it there for 2-hour periods. Normally! It doesn't always work like that, but I think that may be down to my inadequacies!

I like the fact that the tripod has a nice flat top which allows me to level accurately and easily in advance of needing it. I use a standard spirit level for that as I've found the cheap button things to be hopelessly inaccurate. It seems to me that for precision you need a bit of length to the level; the button devices have too small a foot-print, and are often attached by a sticky foam pad, which doesn't ensure parallelism to the mount surface. I agree, attaching the mount to the tripod is easy-peasey. I usually set the time from a time app on my tablet, like time.is, and I try to choose alignment stars separated in azimuth close to 90°, and avoiding those in a directly southern (or northern) direction.

I'm actually about to embark on getting a Starsense and seeing what it can achieve.

Good luck with your new mount.

Ian

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, The Admiral said:

I'm glad to hear that your mount is performing well. I use my Nexstar SE for short exposure DSO astrophotography (FL≤700mm) , and I find it a reasonable performer, not perfect, but acceptable. May be the more refined EVO mount would be better, but it costs too much to consider replacing the SE, just to find out. I only ever do a 2-star manual alignment, with one of the chosen alignment stars near where I want to image. Normally I'd expect the mount to place the target pretty close to the centre of the frame and to keep it there for 2-hour periods. Normally! It doesn't always work like that, but I think that may be down to my inadequacies!

I like the fact that the tripod has a nice flat top which allows me to level accurately and easily in advance of needing it. I use a standard spirit level for that as I've found the cheap button things to be hopelessly inaccurate. It seems to me that for precision you need a bit of length to the level; the button devices have too small a foot-print, and are often attached by a sticky foam pad, which doesn't ensure parallelism to the mount surface. I agree, attaching the mount to the tripod is easy-peasey. I usually set the time from a time app on my tablet, like time.is, and I try to choose alignment stars separated in azimuth close to 90°, and avoiding those in a directly southern (or northern) direction.

I'm actually about to embark on getting a Starsense and seeing what it can achieve.

Good luck with your new mount.

Ian

Thanks! Got one of these coming from FLO today 

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/slt-series/celestron-skyportal-wifi-adapter.html 

Not only will this allow me to use my IPad to control the mount (just like the Evo mount I believe), also some users report that this makes the mount more accurate too. I also was considering to fit the Starsense too on the mount, but am going to hold out first to see how the Skyportal goes first. Yeah, I had a feeling that the small button spirit levels would be too innaccurate really, so may just carry on using the boat level to level up the mount. As it is much easier that the Skywatcher mount to do this this it is no real problem. Let me know how the Starsense camera goes. Cheers! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:icon_biggrin: that'll be my next purchase! I'll need an AUX splitter as well I think, if I am to use both wi-fi and StarSense together.

Ian

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you're happy with it Gus. I found the auto two star with tripod levelled to be the best alignment routine, it's what I used for Alt/Az AP like Ian. I had the handset set for final goto approach up and to the right, so if you make your final adjustments in the same direction, GOTO's will be very accurate :)

I forgot to give you the synscan cable & USB adapter so PM your address and I'll post them up to you.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, The Admiral said:

:icon_biggrin: that'll be my next purchase! I'll need an AUX splitter as well I think, if I am to use both wi-fi and StarSense together.

Ian

Yes, I believe you do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, parallaxerr said:

Glad you're happy with it Gus. I found the auto two star with tripod levelled to be the best alignment routine, it's what I used for Alt/Az AP like Ian. I had the handset set for final goto approach up and to the right, so if you make your final adjustments in the same direction, GOTO's will be very accurate :)

I forgot to give you the synscan cable & USB adapter so PM your address and I'll post them up to you.

Thanks Jon. I'll PM my address for the cables. I got into the habit of doing the final approach to the objects when aligning to up and to the right on my other mount too, so followed that last night too. I'll try the two star alignment next chance I get and see how it goes, but if it's anything as good as the one star alignment also then I'll be well chuffed! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff, Gus!  I often use one-star and it does work well, esp. in the immediate vicinity.  Solar system align is good too.  But I usually use the two named stars method.  

FWIW I did try the WiFi control, but got fed up with holding a tablet and tapping a screen instead of touching real buttons.  And the connection had a habit of dropping out.  Just personal preference I suppose.  But the GPS Module is a great way to avoid bothering about entering date, time, and location.

Doug.  

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, cloudsweeper said:

Great stuff, Gus!  I often use one-star and it does work well, esp. in the immediate vicinity.  Solar system align is good too.  But I usually use the two named stars method.  

FWIW I did try the WiFi control, but got fed up with holding a tablet and tapping a screen instead of touching real buttons.  And the connection had a habit of dropping out.  Just personal preference I suppose.  But the GPS Module is a great way to avoid bothering about entering date, time, and location.

Doug.  

Hi Doug. Yeah, heard some people didn't get on with the wifi connection well. Yet quite a few sing it praises too with no problems, so hoping to fall in the later category (fingers crossed). At least with FLO I get 30 days to send back if not completely satisfied. I should be able to use either my iPad Air or iPhone 6+ with the mount, so will see how it goes. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Knighty2112 said:

Yep. I need to try to an alignment with much further separation I guess. However, the Celestron Goto seems to have coped much better with just one star alignment, even when I then went to parts of the sky that where 180 degrees away from the initial alignment star Sirius. If that proves to be the case consistently then it will be the Celestron mount that will be my de-facto Goto mount from now on. 

Further separation was for EQ, Skywatcher synscan was very specific for AltAz star selection distance range.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Further separation was for EQ, Skywatcher synscan was very specific for AltAz star selection distance range.

In what way was it very specific for AltAz star selection distance range? Surely further separation would help the AltAz mount too along with the EQ versions too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in the manual for the handset, I can't quote the exact figures off the top of my head to post here and be accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My take on alignment is that the mount needs to adjust the 'tilt' of it's inbuilt celestial hemisphere map to match what you are observing, and for that it needs to calculate that tilt in two planes, at right angles to each other. If your alignment stars are around 90° apart in azimuth then I would have thought the mount gets the best information. Conversely, if the alignment stars are 180° apart in azimuth (i.e. in the same plane) then the mount won't get any information on the tilt in the plane at right angles to this, and the alignment won't be good. Interestingly, the Nexstar handbook advises "to select alignment stars that are as far apart in the sky as possible". I don't understand this advice, for the above reasoning.

That's my 2d worth anyway.

Ian

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To follow on from my previous comment synscan v3 manual pages 16 and 17, for Alt-azimuth mount:

• It is recommended that the altitude of the two alignment stars are between 15 and 60 degrees and the deviation of altitude is between 10 and 30 degrees.

• The azimuth deviation of the two alignment stars can be between 45 and 135 degrees, it is best to be close to 90 degrees.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

To follow on from my previous comment synscan v3 manual pages 16 and 17, for Alt-azimuth mount:

• It is recommended that the altitude of the two alignment stars are between 15 and 60 degrees and the deviation of altitude is between 10 and 30 degrees.

• The azimuth deviation of the two alignment stars can be between 45 and 135 degrees, it is best to be close to 90 degrees.

Thanks. I will try that next time I use the Skywatcher mount again and see if things improve with it. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update on the Celestron Goto mount; was out again earlier for just under 2 hours. This time I did a full 3 star align, but connected up via SkySafari with the Celestron Skyportal wifi module I got through from FLO today. I have to say every object I viewed fell easily with the 20mm EP fov again, and managed to see a few things today that I've never seen too (if only I'd noted down what they where! Hehe!). Only issue I had using the Skyportal was it wouldn't let me view M81 or M82 due to been out of range, but this I think is a setting in the mount I need to change as they were close to zenith. However, I did also do a one star alignment without the wifi connection and the mount let me Goto M81 and M82 no problem that way, so will have to look into that. Overall so far I am extremely happy with the mounts performance so far from my LP battle zone in my garden. If I get this to a darker site I would have a field day! :) 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear it went well. I shall keep a watch on any feedback on the SkyPortal, but it is strange that you couldn't view M81/2 when using it, yet you could without using it. Perhaps it is a timing issue, where the target was within limits at one time and not at a different time? One can set slew limits with the Nexstar, under SCOPE SETUP/SLEW LIMITS, which is something I have to do because my OTA (102mm Altair Wave)  is long and can foul the base. Even if the target is within the altitude limit it sometimes warns me that it is not, but presumably that is because of the way the mount homes in on a target, which seems to be from a higher altitude. Also note that this feature doesn't restrict movement when one manually slews the 'scope, only with GOTO, unfortunately.

Incidentally, what 'scope are you using on it?

Ian

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, check the slew limits as Ian says Gus. I set max alt to 60° when using the ST120. You can clear the limits if you're using the 4SE or any other scope that won't hit the base.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, The Admiral said:

I'm glad to hear it went well. I shall keep a watch on any feedback on the SkyPortal, but it is strange that you couldn't view M81/2 when using it, yet you could without using it. Perhaps it is a timing issue, where the target was within limits at one time and not at a different time? One can set slew limits with the Nexstar, under SCOPE SETUP/SLEW LIMITS, which is something I have to do because my OTA (102mm Altair Wave)  is long and can foul the base. Even if the target is within the altitude limit it sometimes warns me that it is not, but presumably that is because of the way the mount homes in on a target, which seems to be from a higher altitude. Also note that this feature doesn't restrict movement when one manually slews the 'scope, only with GOTO, unfortunately.

Incidentally, what 'scope are you using on it?

Ian

Currently using a Celestron 4SE Mak on the mount. I did check th limits on the scope and it was set for 90 degrees, so a little puzzled what the issue might have been to not allow me to view M81 & M82 via Skyportal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By alanwestlake
      Hi,
      First post - so I hope I'm putting this in the right place. I wonder if anyone can help? I've got an EQ3 synscan mount which sits on top of a concrete pillar. Despite the Rigid Pillar and good Polar alignment I get terrible Goto's and Tracking. I wonder if upgrading to an EQ5 might solve some of the problems. It seems, from the reviews, to be a much more accurate mechanism. But if I did that is there any way I could buy the basic EQ5 and use my current EQ3 Synscan motors/handset with it. Buying the whole EQ5 with synscan is horribly expensive, and having already got the synscan unit would seem a waste. 
        
    • By BobNJD87
      Hi all,
      I bought a Astromaster 130EQ two years ago and bought separately a celestron xcell barlow 2x and a Xcell LX 25mm. I now use my iphone to take photo's with a adapter.
      However, I have trouble finding and specially tracking objects. Will an Goto system make this much easier? The next question is, should i stay with my astromaster 130 mm newt. telescope and invest in a goto mount like the skywatcher eq5 with synscan or can i better take an Nexstar 5SE? I am open for other suggestions
      I want to make planetary pictures with my cannon camera (moon / mars / jupiter) if possible deep sky. However there is severe light pollution in my area. 
      Thanks in advance
    • By Skaikru
      Hello All,
      I am new to this forum and find this forum extremely useful. I have gone through almost all the threads requesting advice on the binoculars for stargazing and hopefully I will not frustrate someone for this additional thread.
      I live near San Francisco, CA, USA and in my early 30s. I am planning a trip to Bryce Canyon in 2 months. That place is supposed have very less light pollution and is recommended for Astronomy/Stargazing. I have bought the Sky Safari 5 android app to get me started into astronomy and hopefully I will continue this as a hobby for a long time to come. 
      I have decided to buy 10x50 bins and have found few of these below that are in my sub $99.99 range. I am looking for the best value for the $$ in this range. I will be carrying them in flight and will not be able to baby sit them.
      https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/421389-REG/Bushnell_120150_10x50_Legacy_WP_Binocular.html  - $84.99 - BaK-4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/917674-REG/celestron_71424_10x50_cavalry_binocular.html - $89.95 - BaK-4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof - Nitrogen Filled https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1086598-REG/celestron_71362_10x50_landscout_binocular.html - $74.95 - BAK4 - Fully Multi Coated - Waterproof - Fogproof - Nitrogen Filled http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/binoculars/trooper-10-x-50-dps.html - $69.99 -($20 coupon) - BK-7  http://www.telescope.com/Binoculars/Astronomy-Binoculars/Orion-Scenix-10x50-Wide-Angle-Binoculars/pc/-1/c/5/sc/72/p/9333.uts - $102.99 - BAK-4 - Multi Coated (Considering because I read some reviews about quality optics and wider field of view) Please let me know your recommendations, if you have any.
      Thanks a lot
    • By artoleus
      The struggles of a beginner learning how to use the equipment.  :-)
      Pointed mount North and Levelled EQ6 pro mount 8:30 pm Attached wireless release, 2" nose and UHC filter to Nikon DSLR Attached scope and camera, balanced scope for camera use Collimated the telescope -took 40 minutes of messing around Waited until dark.  Took the dogs for a walk around the field to pass the time Polar aligned using the mobile app and sighting against Ursa major. Rebalanced DEC for eyepiece rather than camera 3 star alignment. 1st star was way off and took ages to get it in the eyepiece Restarted 3 star alignment. - Selected a star behind a house. Restarted 3 star alignment -complete. Checked collimation using a bright star - perfect (should bloody be after 40 minutes!)  Tried to fine adjust polar alignment using a method discovered online (not drift- I don't think I have the patience.)  Didn't work. Restarted 3 star alignment then used the polar alignment on SynScan Took a look at Jupiter was great to look at but not what I set out to do, I want DS images... Attached camera Used live view (LV) to try to focus stars Pointed the scope at M3 and took a 2 minute exposure Tried again with a 4 minute exposure SD card failed.  Lost some family pics, grrr Now I have to explain to my partner that it wasn't because of Astronomy, these things just happen.  Replaced SD card Took some cautious 1 minute exposures of M90 expecting the camera to explode Pictures were faint so moved to 4 minute with a little more confidence telling myself SD card failures can just happen. Noticed star trails Located a bright star Decided to give PEC training a try.  Couldn't do it with an eyepiece. Tried with the camera in LV but noticed some gradual movement in the DEC axis. Hoped PEC training would sort this.   Moved onto the Spiral Galaxy Took some 2 minute exposures of the whirlpool galaxy.  Wireless timer worked flawlessly. Still a little faint so up'd the ISO and took some more.  More detail but more noise. Took some darks with the same settings. Packed away while the camera did its thing. Viewed the pics briefly on laptop. There was star trails (DEC axis again and blurring) Went to bed 1:30 am  
      Summary:
      So what have I learned?  Well DEC error was probably due to the balance of the scope being off.  I never did re-balance for the camera. I've also learnt today that I should bias the balance slightly East so the gears engage better.
      PEC training is a waste of time without an illuminated reticule which I don't have the desire to buy.   I'd rather save for a guide scope and guide camera.   I've learned I can refine the polar alignment after the 3 start alignment process. 
      I've also read on forums that perhaps I should manually move the scope to the first alignment start then continue with the usual process. I've also seen that two star may be the way forward for EQ6.  So perhaps next time I'll start with a 2 star, polar align using the SynScan handset then back to 3 star with the first manual adjustment.
      I should also purchase a few SD cards that are dedicated for Astrophotography and upload them ASAP after the session.
      The Astronomik UHC Deep Sky Filter worked wonders with the images for where I live.  I can now take longer exposures.  Assuming I sort out DEC errors and invest in guiding rig. 
       
    • By C-Sparkes
      Hello
      I have recently brought my first telescope and am looking to upgrade the eye pieces. 
      I have a celestron powerseeker 127eq and was wondering which eyepiece set would best suit the telescope for planets and galaxies.
      Thanks.