Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_lunar_landings.thumb.jpg.b50378d0845690d8a03305a49923eb40.jpg

frugal

California Nebula under moonlit skies

Recommended Posts

First attempt at imaging in a while. Probably not a good idea to try this with an unmodified DSLR, but I figured I would give it a go. Only 10x300s subs before the moisture levels really started to rise and everything just became soggy. Lots of problems with guiding as well, 8 out of the 10 had some kind of guidance error show up in the frame (fortunately they were straight lines out and bak in one of the cardinal directions so they mostly got cleared up in stacking). Final image is horribly noisy due to the poor quality of the starting frames, but I am at least back in the saddle again. Someone remind me where PixInsight put the "Silk Purse from Sows Ear" function, I seem to have lost it ;)

33470068745_4cf1255b6d_c.jpgNGC1499_CaliforniaNebula 

To give you an example of the frames I had to work with:

33086533510_41ddf2b95c_c.jpgngc1499-Light-ISO800-300sec-frame3_16C 

Lights: 10x300s @ ISO800; Darks: 112; Bias: 489; Flats: 35

Scope: Skywatcher ED80-DS Pro

Camera: Canon D60 (unmodified)

Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GT

Guiding: Skywatcher ST-80 and Lodestar X2 using PHD

Processing: PixInsight

 

I tried to move from ISO400 to ISO800 as I read that it helps with the horrible banding from the Canon camera, however now I end up with bright stars blowing out ;(

Edited by frugal
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good effort considering the conditions.

As you have PI go to  script > utilities > Canon banding reduction, (you may have to alter the parameters slightly) it does a great job of removing even the worst banding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MARS1960 said:

Very good effort considering the conditions.

As you have PI go to  script > utilities > Canon banding reduction, (you may have to alter the parameters slightly) it does a great job of removing even the worst banding.

I make extensive use of that script when I have a bad image, but sometimes the image defeats the script. For example, this stack of 41x30 second subs has horrible banding that does not appear in any of the individual subs, or the bias/dark frames, and defeated all of my attempts at cleaning it up. Fortunately I only needed the core for HDR processing with some longer duration subs.

33346058961_c23513dd20_c.jpgM42_0030s_Color

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thats serious banding, i have never encountered anything that bad and never vertical though i am fairly new to AP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shot of the California nebula under the given situation. Do you have a single sub with the background extracted? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Nova2000 said:

Nice shot of the California nebula under the given situation. Do you have a single sub with the background extracted? 

Here is the same single sub, but calibrated (Darks, Bias, Flats), Background Neutralisation, and a simple stretch to make it non linear (puts the peak of the histogram at 25%).

33347470761_5fb7ca4d24_c.jpgngc1499_Light_ISO800_300sec_frame3_16C_c_RGB_VNG

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nebula is starting to reveal itself--nice FOV.  I know all to well the conditions you face.  If it wasn't for narrowband I would probably have long ago beat my rig into smithereens.

Rodd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rodd said:

 If it wasn't for narrowband I would probably have long ago beat my rig into smithereens.

I keep putting various combinations of CCDs and filters into the FLO shopping basket, in the hope that one time it will magically become affordable; then sighing and taking it all back out again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, frugal said:

I keep putting various combinations of CCDs and filters into the FLO shopping basket, in the hope that one time it will magically become affordable; then sighing and taking it all back out again.

I know that feeling too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Xiga
      Back in early Feb I tried imaging Markarian's Chain, but after 2 subs I encountered guiding issues (a first for me) so had to give up. 
      So just for kicks and giggles, I decided to process them! ? 
      So this is 2 x 10mins. With the D5300, 80ED and HEQ5-Pro. 'Stacked' (if it's even right to use that term!) in APP, and processed in PS. Then reduced to 75% for posting. 
      Why oh why oh why..... I honestly don't even know myself ?

    • By Deflavio
      I know DSLRs are more for “official” AP imaging and I should probably stick with my trusty ASI224 or maybe think about a 294 or similar sensors but....as probably many, I have a DSLR sitting at home not doing much. Can I do EAA with it?
       
      Today is quite easy to have 24Mp in relativity cheap bodies so why not to use it somehow? Small pixels..I know, but maybe going for wide field and bright objects with fast lenses it may still work and give something interesting. Anyone tried? Any experience? 
       
      What I really like of EAA is the ability to do everything while observing and without the need to come back for long processing sessions. I have searched around a bit but I can’t find a stacking software like Sharpcap for DSLR doing live viewing as well as stacking. I think I could somehow save each frame in a folder and then stack them with DSS (if I got the name right) but can I then control remotely the camera, exposition and have live preview when slewing around?
       
      Just interested to know if anyone know more about this or more in general discuss about DSLR and EAA.
       
      Flavio
    • By Xiga
      Hi guys
      I'm breaking the cardinal rule here of posting late at night, right after finishing PP, so let's see what sense the dawn brings! ? 
      I shot this in the early hrs of 29th of March. There was no moon present (i think!) and conditions were pretty good, AFAIK. 
      This is 28 x 360s, so about 2.75 hrs in total. Taken as usual with the D5300, IDAS-D1, and SW 80ED. 
      APP used for stacking and gradient reduction, everything else done in PS. 
      Would have liked twice, or 3 times, the data, but it's just not happening, so i've just decided to process what i've got. 
      Thanks for looking, and all CC welcome as always ?

    • By masjstovel
      Hi,

      I'm totally New to this hobby and i'm having trouble understanding something in stellarium.
      I have ordered (not recieved) a Sky-Watcher Explorer 150PDS, which has a 25mm eyepiece 50degrees FOV as a default.
      I also have a Nikon D810.

      I wanted to get an idea of what my field of view would be with the 25mm eyepiece (30x on 750mm focal length), 
      and also what it would be With my Nikon D810 mounted shooting prime Focus - no eyepieces.

      What surprised me was that it wasnt much difference between the frame and size of the object i get with 30x magnification (25mm eyepiece), and what i get with the Nikon D810 mounted. 
      I dont get this. What magnification do i get With my DSLR mounted with no eyepiece?



    • By chris_33
      i am looking for a coma corrector for astrophotography, i have a skywatcher 254/1200 pds, a nikon d5100, and a skywatcher off axis guider, what would you recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.