Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep25_banner.thumb.jpg.9e57eee22cad68fd6b67a87befeaa79b.jpg

Recommended Posts

Yo yo! Ti's my first time posting here, but it seems like a good place to ask such a question. Recently I've been getting into astronomy, really interesting stuff imo. And I've been considering getting a telescope (if the weather clears up within the next few months). Currently I'm just viewing by the naked eye, but since it's been a full moon I was unable to see as many stars as I would otherwise. But I'll stop rambling and get to my question.

Basically, I've always really accosiated the view of telescopes being just, unclear and blurry. Mainly because I always saw it as strange towards if you can really get a good view, that of course isnt too blurry, just by zooming in and focusing a bit with a telescope. Is that just a misconception of mine? or are telescopes usually rather blurry? Sorry for my newbie question, ahah.

My second question is where exactly I should look for a telescope if I do decide to buy one. I'm in the UK by the way.

That should be all for now. Any and all replies are appreciated.

Thank you~ 
 

Edited by doinurmop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and a warm welcome to the SGL. If the telescope is properly focused the view should be pin sharp, as long as you do not try to use too much magnification for the particular scope and the atmospheric conditions are good.

As for purchasing a telescope new, I would always recommend a reputable dealer such as FLO this sites sponsor. Money can be saved buying second hand but care must be taken and it is better to seek advice from an experienced observer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

doinurmop - I got my first 'scope in December - I got mine from FLO.  Ask on these forums and find out what 'scope they recommend, and then treat yourself to some large FLO cardboard boxes full of goodies.  Don't be tempted to get one from a chain-store or museum! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, laudropb said:

Hello and a warm welcome to the SGL. If the telescope is properly focused the view should be pin sharp, as long as you do not try to use too much magnification for the particular scope and the atmospheric conditions are good.

As for purchasing a telescope new, I would always recommend a reputable dealer such as FLO this sites sponsor. Money can be saved buying second hand but care must be taken and it is better to seek advice from an experienced observer.

Thank you~! And oh alrighty then! I have heard that more magnification is not always better. Infact I've heard that the bigger a telescope is in diameter, the more of a clearer image you'll usually get. Thanks for answering that, probs take a bit of trial and error with the focusing to get it just right, but it should be worth it. As for atmospheric conditions, that's to be expected, even though england is unpredictable.

As for FLO, i'll definitely check them out. They seem to have some pretty good prices on telescopes and the accesories. And yeah, If I were to buy a telescope i'd rather want it brand new anyway.

9 minutes ago, JOC said:

doinurmop - I got my first 'scope in December - I got mine from FLO.  Ask on these forums and find out what 'scope they recommend, and then treat yourself to some large FLO cardboard boxes full of goodies.  Don't be tempted to get one from a chain-store or museum! 

Real surprised I have not heard about FLO before this site then. Once I get a hold of my budget, I'll definitely ask around on the forums what people reccomend.

Seeing large boxes full of goodies will probably be the best part. Frankly,even if the weather is not great for star viewing, the looks of all telescopes have a lovely aesthectic to them, which frankly makes them great to look at in general. Also yeah I've heard buying from a chain store, is quite the dumb idea. Though as for museum I've never heard of them even selling telescopes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommendations about what to buy can only be suggested  when we know what your aims are.
Whether you just wish to observe the skies in a general way, or do you have any specific Ideas about
whether you want to delve into Deep Sky objects, Planetary, plus eventually doing Astro. photography too.
The Budget you have to spend would also have a bearing on what members would suggest is a good buy for your Buck
so to speak. One clue I can give you, the larger the lens, or Mirror, the more detail will be revealed, but not for 
every object you observe.  Stars never increase in size through an Eyepiece, however large a lens or mirror you have.They are much too far away
to see other than a point of light. 
If you live in a Town/City that may have an Astronomical Society, you could do worse than pay them a Visit,
and ask permission to join them on one of their meetings nights, a meeting when they intend to have observing sessions.
You then could have a look and even use members telescopes, in order to glean some Idea of what it is you prefer.
There are  used Instruments  sites on the Internet too, whereby you might pick up a bargain when you decide
what it is you would like. A word of warning though, seek advice fro the membership here  before committing your money
to any Item for sale. You will be advised accordingly.



 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what you are looking at budget wises, but I was truly astonished at how little it cost to set-up with a really serviceable telescope - I splurged a fair bit to get a goto unit on mine, but really it is not necessary and if you have £300 to chuck at the project the guys here will be able to direct you to some really good kit.  For example you can get manual one the same size as mine, with a fixed length tube (mine collapses) for £285 a fact which I find is really astonishing when I see what some chain stores charge for far lesser instruments.  So £285 will get you a 'proper' telescope that will last years and years if you need it to and be capable of viewing all sorts of thing through.  There will be loads of options around that sort of budget and I was just surprised that you could get into the hobby that cheaply. 

Edited by JOC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, barkis said:

Recommendations about what to buy can only be suggested  when we know what your aims are.
Whether you just wish to observe the skies in a general way, or do you have any specific Ideas about
whether you want to delve into Deep Sky objects, Planetary, plus eventually doing Astro. photography too.
The Budget you have to spend would also have a bearing on what members would suggest is a good buy for your Buck
so to speak. One clue I can give you, the larger the lens, or Mirror, the more detail will be revealed, but not for 
every object you observe.  Stars never increase in size through an Eyepiece, however large a lens or mirror you have.They are much too far away
to see other than a point of light. 

Of course. While my aims may indeed change, frankly since I'd like to be both balanced on deep sky objects, and planetary, my aim would most likely be to view it in a general way. Since it'd be my frist time with a telescope, I dont really have a specific aim, or plan. AS for astrophtoography, depending on how much I'd need to put out to future proof for that, I probably wont be planning for it at from the start at-least. 

 

20 minutes ago, JOC said:

I don't know what you are looking at budget wises, but I was truly astonished at how little it cost to set-up with a really serviceable telescope - I splurged a fair bit to get a goto unit on mine, but really it is not necessary and if you £300 to chuck at the project the guys here will be able to direct you to some really good kit.  For example you can get manual one the same size as mine, with a fixed length tube (mine collapses) for £285 a fact which I find is really astonishing when I see what some chain stores charge for far lesser instruments.  So £285 will get you a 'proper' telescope that will last years and years if you need it to and be capable of viewing all sorts of thing through.  There will be loads of options around that sort of budget and I was just surprised that you could get into the hobby that cheaply. 

Frankly if I had to guess.. My budget could be anywhere from £200-£300. But before I give a solid answer, I really need to sort that out first.

And yeah, I'm also quite surprised by the cost, it's impressive. Also I've definitely seen people use those, online, but I probs wont want a goto myself, I'd rather search for my target, by hand.  £285 though, that's quite bloody good. And yeah, chain-stores are always gonna sell lesser things for outrageous prices. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was new to this game at the beginning of the year when I got my first scope- once I had taken advice from the natives herabouts. The advice was sound and as a result I have experienced trhe delights of both Lunar, Planetary and Deep Space observing.

My rig is the Skywatcher detailed below. I got mine at a reduced price as it was a customer return to another retailer. Always worth looking aht the specials available from the supplers of Astronomy Shiny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zermelo
      The focuser on my SkyWatcher 150i is a basic rack-and-pinion, unsurprising for the price point, but sometimes a bit of a pain to control finely enough. I’m not looking to spend any serious money upgrading it, but I did want to see what I could tweak.

      The first thing I did was to slacken off (slightly) the screws holding the plate against the spindle, as the operation was very tight when new – that helped a bit (and I think that without doing this first, the “friction fit” approach described below wouldn’t have worked). I will eventually get around to taking it all off as per AstroBaby's tune-up.

      Improving the fine control without a major change means doing something with the focusing knobs – they’re quite small, so the effective “gearing ratio” when you operate them is on the harsh side. Some folk have described fitting larger diameter replacements, either bought or made, and even using ones with a planetary-style mechanism to achieve a reduction in the ratio. I didn’t fancy this, as I couldn’t see how the existing knobs were attached to the spindle without trying to prise them apart (possibly terminally). The other option is to increase the effective diameter of the existing knobs, for which purpose a clothes peg is apparently quite popular, but I’ve also come across descriptions of chop sticks inserted into holes drilled at intervals into the circumference, and punctured lids from peanut butter jars.

      I wanted something that was cheap, relatively tidy and non-destructive. The answer seemed to be some sort of thick sleeve that I could fit over the knob. It would need to be a tight fit so as not to slip in use, to be not so large as to foul against either the focuser tube or the main OTA, and to be thick enough that it didn’t flex sideways when grasped. I thought I might find some larger rubber washers that would do the job, but none were thick enough to be rigid in use. However, a bit of searching found these spacers that are apparently used in vehicle shock absorbers.

      My calipers said the diameter of the focuser knobs was around 29.5mm, and the nearest spacers that were available had an internal hole 30mm and outside diameter 60mm. I ordered one that was 10mm thick, not quite as deep as the knobs, but which allowed a bit more space on the inside edge for free operation. I’d hoped the internal hole might be a but undersized when it arrived but it was spot on, so I wound five or six turns of masking tape around the knob first. To avoid taking the tape off when fitting the spacer, I positioned one side first and stretched it across the face as I pushed. When it’s flush with the knob’s outer face, it’s just clear of the focuser body and OTA. There might be enough room to stick some kind of friction surface around the outside to improve the grip, but I don’t think it’s going to be necessary.

      I decided to do only the one knob, so I now have a very Noddy “dual speed” affair.  Because the clearances around the fitted spacer are quite tight, it’s worth checking the positioning of the spindle in the focuser body first – mine was fractionally off centre, so there was more room one side than the other (assuming you have no preference).



       



       

       
       
       
       
       
    • By KateSheff
      Hiya, 
      I'm planning on getting a telescope for my son for Christmas (he'll be 6 by then). I want it to have some lasting potential and would rsther get a decent ish one so he can actually see things more clearly and retain his interest, although obv don't want to spend a fortune. However, we don't have a car, so in terms of opportunities to take advantage of dark skies, it would need to be portable. I was all set on the Skywatcher Heritage 150p and it seemed to tick so many boxes, and it kept getting tagged as very portable and great for travel, but I just noticed the weight is 7.5kg... so it may be portable compared to bigger ones, but I'm not sure about lugging it, a whole load of camping gear and two kids on a bus and a train! 
      Does anyone have any recommendations for anything similar spec-wise, where you can collimate both ends etc, that's also an easy set up and that's just a bit more lightweight?
      Thanks,
      Kate
    • By Sidecontrol
      Hi Everyone,
       
      Not posted some images since my introduction in the welcome section.  With the dark nights finally back here in Scotland I thought Id share some of the DSOs I managed to capture back in Feb-April just before the light nights rolled in at the start of May.
       
      These were all stacked and edited in PixInsight.  
      1.  The Running Man and Orion Nebula - less than an hour of integration time (SA pro + fuji 55-200mm lens).
      2. Bodes and Cigar Galaxy - Less than an hour of integration time ( SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope). 
      3. Flame, Horsehead, Running Man and Orion Nebula - Less than an hour of integration time (SA pro + fuji 55-200mm lens).
      4. Pinwheel Galaxy - 35 mins integration time (SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope).
      5  Whirlpool Galaxy - 21 mins integration time (SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope). 
      6.  Andromeda Galaxy - 1.5 minutes integration time (Move Shoot Move + fuji 55-200mm lens).  
       






    • By AstroRookie
      Hello,
      I took a shot of M13 as a first test of my new orion 8 f/3.9. I have a couple of questions about the final result.
      Equipment list:
      orion 8 f/3.9 mount skywatcher eq6r-pro canon 500d - astro-modded by me 40 exposures of 90 seconds and 40 darks 200 bias 200 flats capture software: nebulosity4 guide camera: zwo asi120mm guide scope: svbony 20 (80mm - 400mm) guide software: phd2 Processing:
      siril preprocessing: align/callibrate/stack) siril post-processing: green nois reduction/ photometric noise reduction (very cool!)/deconvolution Result:
      I attached a screenshot of siril (as the tif or jpg export did not show these "problems")
      My questions:
      after preprocessing, I still have 2 problems (see the marked areas); what can be the cause of that? Are my flats not "correct"? The big mark, is a spot on the sensor, that is the "collateral damage" of me removing the Ir-cut filter. The other mark must be an other issue, I don't know so far the right part of the picture, shows some sort of glow; there was no moon during capturing; I live in a bortle class 5 area, but street lights are dimmed after midnight, till 05:00am and shots were taken around 01:00am. what can cause this glow Other remarks are very welcome - I hope to learn from it.
      Thanks in advance,
      AstroRookie

    • By rorymultistorey
      Hi,
      This video is intended to be for someone who is thinking of buying their first scope but isn't sure which one is best.  I would love it to be a good jumping off point for discussion and I hope some wise heads will wade in and answer questions and offer alternative opinions. Thx to astrostace and helena's astro and deddy dayag for contributing. I fear I'm going to have my head down making my next video as I'm currently astrobiscuiting full time (or at least till my loan runs out!). So all help  much appreciated. 😉
      https://youtu.be/Na-aBhc_gTY

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.