Jump to content

stargazine_ep38_banner.thumb.jpg.6fe20536a22b28c17b2ee1818650993c.jpg

Manual removal of vignetting/border gradient in Photoshop


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I'm new to this post processing malarky and my previous astro photos wasn't affected by vignetting that much. Now I have a coma corrector it is very much a problem when taking photo's of nebulae.

I see some people use an expensive plugin to remove their vignetting/gradient around their borders but if its easily doable manually then I'd like to give it a shot.

Could someone help me out by sending me a guide to remove such objects from my photos please? I have many years using Photoshop, but AP post processing is a completely different beast to tame.

Cheers,

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tom,

For Photoshop, there is a plugin from Russel Croman called GradientXTerminator.  You can find it here: http://www.rc-astro.com/resources/GradientXTerminator/purchase.php

Version for 32 and 64Bits PS are available.

In my opinion, this is the best plugin to reduce the astronomical images gradient.

A manual nice approach that doesn't imply to buy the plugin, can be found here: http://www.flemingastrophotography.com/gradients.html

Regards,

Fernando

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, nandopg said:

A manual nice approach that doesn't imply to buy the plugin, can be found here:

Cheers Fernando for grabbing this for me.

Here is a before and after photo of an unprocessed image of me trying to remove the gradient manually through Photoshop.

gradient.thumb.png.ae540181d36f5f32113f0ac9508859e4.png

 

Edited by PESKYWAABBIT
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PESKYWAABBIT said:

Cheers Fernando for grabbing this for me.

Here is a before and after photo of an unprocessed image of me trying to remove the gradient manually through Photoshop.

gradient.thumb.png.ae540181d36f5f32113f0ac9508859e4.png

 

Wow, you did a great job !! You have reduced the background to a constant value of 40 counts over the whole image.  Great !

Keep up the great job.

Fernando

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By GHOSTGOJ
      hello,
      I have been imaging the California nebula and found that there was a large gradient in the final image. I have now taken some flat frames for the setup and found that the gradient was in all of the photos and took up about 1/3 of the sensor space. 
       
      I have attached an image of a flat frame to show the issue. 
       
      I am currently using a skywatcher esprit 100ed with my ASI 294 MC PRO. Between the two of them are, field flattened, ZWO OAG, 2 spacers and ontology l-enhance filter. I have checked down the objective and can see no issues with the alignment up to the filter. All threads are screwed in correctly with a snug fit, and there are no massive pieces of debris covering the objective.
      need help ASAP please.
      cheers,
      george

    • By astrobena
      Hey everyone,
      I was out recently in what felt like the first clear sky in years and got ~109 min of data on M31, minus 76 frames due to a 12mph wind, which left me with 69 min of data (each shot is 45 sec with ISO 200 tracked with skywatcher star adventurer). As mentioned in the title I captured all these images in a bortal 8 location, used an unmodified canon eos 400d and the skywatcher 75ed as the scope (with a flattener). I've attached my edit (warning: it is not great at all + slightly overedited to see what details are even there), and to be my surprise it looked very similar to an image of M31 with only 20 min of data which i captured a month earlier (both of which i used DSS and photoshop for). Now this may well have something to do with the way i edited it in photoshop or a different setting in DSS or just the fact that 49 more data doesnt make much of a difference considering im in a bortal 8 location, maybe you guys could help on that. I've attached the link to the original files (in the folder called 18.2.2021) as well as the stacked image from DSS (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12NT4TmLCXvTfOXNPE_l8UWPRpgO2VjLe?usp=sharing). I didnt capture any flat images but have dark and bias frames, all in their correpsonding folders in the attached link. It would be greatly appreciated if you guys could see if there is more data in this then i have managed to 'extract' using photoshop. (If you use different software and try and edit these files please tell me what you used) If there isn't then maybe do you guys have any images of M31 (or similar) from very light polluted skies that you could share here? (If so i would if you could share the full exposure time and gear that would be great)
       
      Many Thanks!
       

    • By ntaylorblanchard
      I think I need help with my Photoshop settings.   I've been processing my photos and been very unhappy/depressed with the results.  I then realized that they looked a lot better on my phone than on my PC screen.  I  did some testing and I discovered that Photoshop (CS4 -  both 32bit and 64bit) and the basic Windows viewer [the two things I've been using all this time to look at my images] are displaying poorer quality views of  my images than other viewers or programs.  (see attached images)  I think I just noticed this because I just got a CMOS OSC camera and was expecting a lot better than it seemed I was getting.
      Do I have something set wrong in Photoshop?  I really don't want to spend the money to get Pixinsight just right now (and the time to learn it) but I need to be able to see what the image really looks like while I'm processing it.
      At first I thought the problem was with my monitor, but since I do see the correct image with some programs I've concluded that the issue must be with Photoshop itself.  However, I have no idea at all how to fix it.
      I've uploaded two views of an early processing stage of an Andromeda photograph.
       

      This one shows the image as seen in Gimp, Irfan View, Windows Paint, on-line, the new Windows "Photos" or on other laptops, phones, etc.
       
       

      This one shows the image as seen in Photoshop or in the Windows Photo Viewer or Photo Gallery on my PC.  (I used screen capture to get this but it is accurate for what I see).
      As you can see above, the image I'm seeing in Photoshop has problems.  The main problem I notice is that the gradients of color do not flow smoothly but are concentric areas of flat color.  No depth or subtlety.
      Can this be fixed and if so what do I need to adjust in Photoshop or my PC?  I'm using Photoshop CS4 and this effect shows up in both the 32bit and 64 bit versions.
      Any help would be appreciated.
      Thanks and Clear Skies Everyone
      Taylor Blanchard
    • By Demonperformer
      Does anyone have an active link to one of these manuals on the net? There are a ton of links that go nowhere, but I have been at google for nearly an hour and am no closer ...
      Thanks.
    • By Micksb
      Hi all, new to astronomy.
       
      Have bought a Williams 81,  canon D450 had it modified.  Celestron  advance gt mount.
      I want to use Eos backyard, (apparently it can only use 32 bit as there are no (canon)drivers for 64bit
      I need to buy a computer to run the above programmes 32/ 64 bit ?haven't a clue what requirements I need.or if a new computer will run it.
      I also need to buy a Photoshop programme. Think it needs  64 bit to run it 
      Need all to be compatible any help would be appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.